World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William E. Hockley

William E. Hockley

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11200 10479 777 729 90 3827

William E. Hockley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William E. Hockley between 1975 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William E. Hockley published across 50 years, from 1975 to 2024, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2013. 4 of the 119 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2013. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications
1975 2024

119 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William E. Hockley: publications per year, 1975 to 2024
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 3
1983 0
1984 3
1985 2
1986 0
1987 4
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 6
1993 0
1994 3
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 4
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 5
2012 6
2013 16
2014 8
2015 2
2016 4
2017 7
2018 1
2019 4
2020 3
2021 1
2022 4
2023 2
2024 2
Total 119
Download as CSV

William E. Hockley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Hockley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 90
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

William E. Hockley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Hockley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William E. Hockley is affiliated with Wilfrid Laurier University in Canada and has contributed notably to research in the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology.

Their research work primarily revolves around memory processes and influences, with additional interests in deception detection and forensic psychology, psychological and educational research studies, child and animal learning development, social and intergroup psychology, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning.

Hockley has published in several academic venues, including:

  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)
  • Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Recent papers by William E. Hockley include:

  • "In support of selective rehearsal: Double-item presentation in item-method directed forgetting," 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Stimulus-based mirror effects revisited," 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • "Two dichotomies of recognition memory," 2022, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
  • "Recognition memory: The probe, the returned signal, and the decision," 2023, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect," 2020, Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)

The scientist has worked with various frequent co-authors, including:

  • Tyler M. Ensor
  • Ian Neath
  • Aimée M. Surprenant
  • Pelin Tan
  • Geoffrey Harrison

Hockley's research contributions have been recognized with the distinction of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) awarded in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes.

    William E. Hockley

  • Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.

    William E. Hockley;Angela Consoli

  • Relating Theory and Data : Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock

    William E. Hockley;Stephan Lewandowsky

  • The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.

    William E. Hockley

  • Components of Activation: Repetition and Priming Effects in Lexical Decision and Recognition

    Roger Ratcliff;William Hockley;Gail McKoon

  • Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new.

    Steve Joordens;William E. Hockley

  • Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates.

    William E. Hockley

  • A decision model for accuracy and response latency in recognition memory.

    William E. Hockley;Bennet B. Murdock

  • Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information

    William E. Hockley;Carolina Cristi

  • The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.

    William E. Hockley

  • Recognition Memory for Item and Associative Information: A Comparison of Forgetting Rates

    William E. Hockley

  • Retrieval processes in continuous recognition

    William E. Hockley

  • Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition

    William E. Hockley

  • Improving associative memory in older adults with unitization

    Fahad N. Ahmad;Myra Fernandes;William E. Hockley

  • Tests of the list-strength effect in recognition memory.

    Andrew P. Yonelinas;William E. Hockley;Bennet B. Murdock

  • Short-Term Memory for Associations

    Bennet B. Murdock;William E. Hockley

  • Components of activation: Repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition.

    Unknown

  • Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control

    Zeynep Barlas;William E. Hockley;Sukhvinder S. Obhi

  • The role of familiarity in associative recognition of unitized compound word pairs.

    Fahad N. Ahmad;William E. Hockley

  • Tests of the separate retrieval of item and associative information using a frequency-judgment task

    William E. Hockley;Carolina Cristi

  • The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: familiarity versus recollection.

    Terri E. Cameron;William E. Hockley

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Lewandowsky
Stephan Lewandowsky University of Bristol
Bennet B. Murdock
Bennet B. Murdock University of Toronto
Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Sukhvinder S. Obhi McMaster University
Andrew P. Yonelinas
Andrew P. Yonelinas University of California, Davis
Daniel M. Bernstein
Daniel M. Bernstein Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Ian Neath
Ian Neath Memorial University of Newfoundland
Gail McKoon
Gail McKoon The Ohio State University
Michael S. Humphreys
Michael S. Humphreys University of Queensland
Michael C. Corballis
Michael C. Corballis University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a range of rewarding career options. One popular pathway is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role focused on helping individuals, couples, and families navigate their mental health and relationships.

There are specific requirements to enter this field, which can vary by location. For instance, those interested can learn about Atlanta MFT certification requirements to understand education and licensing steps in Georgia’s capital. Procedural differences exist across the country. For example, future therapists may want to learn how to become an MFT in Aurora or how to become an MFT in Austin, each with unique licensure standards.

If you’re considering California, you can investigate how to become an MFT in Bakersfield. No matter where you study, online degrees in psychology provide flexibility and accessibility, allowing you to begin your journey toward a fulfilling career in mental health and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Hockley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles