World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
65357
World Ranking
1679
National Ranking
190

John D. Teasdale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Teasdale sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John D. Teasdale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Teasdale sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John D. Teasdale is affiliated with the MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans neuroscience and psychology, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies

John D. Teasdale has contributed to the academic literature through publications in the journal Zygon®. One of their recent papers is titled RESHAPING THE HEART-MIND: A RESPONSE TO ROWAN WILLIAMS, published in 2023 in Zygon®. This publication reflects the scientist's engagement with interdisciplinary themes that may intersect with psychology and cognitive studies.

Their work in neuroscience and experimental psychology indicates an emphasis on understanding the relationships between cognitive processes and emotional states such as anxiety and depression.

Frequent publication venues in their academic output include:

  • Zygon®

Best Publications

  • Learned Helplessness in Humans: Critique and Reformulation

    Lyn Y. Abramson;Martin E. P. Seligman;John D. Teasdale

  • Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse

    Zindel V. Segal;J. Mark G. Williams;John D. Teasdale

  • Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.

    J D Teasdale;Z V Segal;J M Williams;V A Ridgeway

  • Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change?

    John D Teasdale

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: replication and exploration of differential relapse prevention effects.

    S. Helen Ma;John D. Teasdale

  • Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: Empirical evidence

    John D. Teasdale;Richard G. Moore;Hazel Hayhurst;Marie Pope

  • How does cognitive therapy prevent depressive relapse and why should attentional control (mindfulness) training help

    John D. Teasdale;Zindel Segal;J.Mark G. Williams

  • Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Depression

    Zindel V. Segal;J. Mark G. Williams;John D Teasdale;Jon Kabat-Zinn

  • Affect, Cognition and Change: Re-Modelling Depressive Thought

    Philip Barnard;John Teasdale

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent relapse in recurrent depression.

    Willem Kuyken;Sarah Byford;Rod S. Taylor;Ed Watkins

  • How does mindfulness-based cognitive therapy work?

    Willem Kuyken;Ed Watkins;Emily Holden;Kat White

  • Cognitive Vulnerability to Persistent Depression

    John D. Teasdale

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression

    Z V Segal;Williams Jmg.;J D Teasdale

  • Predictors of relapse in unipolar depressives: expressed emotion, marital distress, and perceived criticism

    Jill M. Hooley;John D. Teasdale

  • Initial psychometric properties of the experiences questionnaire: validation of a self-report measure of decentering.

    David M. Fresco;Michael T. Moore;Manfred H.M. van Dulmen;Zindel V. Segal

  • Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis From Randomized Trials

    Willem Kuyken;Fiona C. Warren;Rod S. Taylor;Ben Whalley

  • Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy reduces overgeneral autobiographical memory in formerly depressed patients.

    J. M. G. Williams;J. D. Teasdale;Z. V. Segal;J. Soulsby

  • Rumination and overgeneral memory in depression: effects of self-focus and analytic thinking.

    Ed Watkins;John D. Teasdale

  • Diurnal variation in clinical depression and accessibility of memories of positive and negative experiences

    David M. Clark;John D. Teasdale

  • Levels of expressed emotion and relapse in depressed patients.

    Jill M. Hooley;John Orley;John D. Teasdale

Frequent Co-Authors

Zindel V. Segal
Zindel V. Segal University of Toronto
Eugene S. Paykel
Eugene S. Paykel University of Cambridge
J. Mark G. Williams
J. Mark G. Williams University of Oxford
Edward R. Watkins
Edward R. Watkins University of Exeter
Jan Scott
Jan Scott Newcastle University
Lucy Serpell
Lucy Serpell University College London
Tim Dalgleish
Tim Dalgleish University of Cambridge
Mark Williams
Mark Williams University of Leicester
Gin S Malhi
Gin S Malhi University of Sydney
Janet Treasure
Janet Treasure King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens the door to a range of online degrees and specialized pathways. Many students explore marriage and family therapy (MFT) as a rewarding field with strong job prospects. To become an MFT, it’s important to understand that certification requirements can vary widely by location.

For example, those interested in pursuing mft requirements in Honolulu must complete a master’s degree and meet supervised clinical hours. In Texas, mft requirements in Houston include additional jurisprudence exams and state-specific credentials.

Alabama students need to review the Huntsville mft certification requirements, which focus on board-approved coursework and ethics training. Meanwhile, mft requirements in Indianapolis emphasize supervised internship experiences and ongoing education.

Exploring these varied pathways ensures you meet local licensure rules and positions you for a fulfilling psychology career. Online programs can provide flexibility, but always verify that your chosen degree meets state licensing standards for the counseling specialty you wish to pursue.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Teasdale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles