World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7350 6854 732 698 142 5798

Andrew Soundy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew Soundy between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew Soundy published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2014. 44 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2014. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 40 publications 2026: 4 publications
2003 2026

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew Soundy: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 2
2008 0
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 12
2014 44
2015 16
2016 20
2017 6
2018 5
2019 9
2020 12
2021 12
2022 14
2023 19
2024 21
2025 40
2026 4
Total 245
Download as CSV

Andrew Soundy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Soundy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 142
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew Soundy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Soundy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew Soundy is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, particularly focusing on subfields such as Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Surgery, and Rehabilitation. Their research spans a broad array of topics including musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, empathy and medical education, sports injuries and prevention, sport psychology, and performance.

Recent publications by Andrew Soundy include:

  • The experiences and perceived health benefits of individuals with a disability participating in sport: A systematic review and narrative synthesis, 2021, Disability and Health Journal
  • The Experience of Post-Stroke Pain and The Impact on Quality of Life: An Integrative Review, 2020, Behavioral Sciences
  • Meta-ethnography, 2022, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • E-learning communication skills training for physiotherapy students: A two phased sequential mixed methods study, 2021, Patient Education and Counseling
  • People's Experience of Shared Decision Making in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis, 2022, Behavioral Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Soundy include:

  • Nicola R Heneghan
  • Alison Rushton
  • Sheeba Rosewilliam
  • Deborah Falla
  • Ahmad Sahely

The most common venues for Andrew Soundy's publications are:

  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Preprints.org
  • Physiotherapy
  • BMJ Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Andrew Soundy's work often addresses complex aspects of rehabilitation and pain management, with a focus on improving patient experiences and outcomes. Their publications frequently explore themes of shared decision-making, communication skills training, and the qualitative experience of patients in clinical settings. The combination of systematic reviews, narrative syntheses, and integrative reviews characterizes their approach to evidence synthesis across multiple studies and disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Dropout from exercise randomized controlled trials among people with depression: A meta-analysis and meta regression.

    Brendon Stubbs;Brendon Stubbs;Davy Vancampfort;Simon Rosenbaum;Philip B. Ward

  • Schizophrenia and weight management: a systematic review of interventions to control weight.

    G Faulkner;AA Soundy;K Lloyd

  • Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: A systematic review.

    Alice Rose;Sheeba Rosewilliam;Andrew Soundy

  • Are older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain less active than older adults without pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Brendon Stubbs;Tarik T. Binnekade;Andy Soundy;Pat Schofield

  • The importance of self-determined motivation towards physical activity in patients with schizophrenia.

    Davy Vancampfort;Marc De Hert;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Amber De Herdt

  • Selection, use and psychometric properties of physical activity measures to assess individuals with severe mental illness: a narrative synthesis.

    Andrew Soundy;Caroline Roskell;Brendon Stubbs;Davy Vancampfort

  • A systematic review of physical therapy interventions for patients with anorexia and bulemia nervosa

    Davy Vancampfort;Johan Vanderlinden;Marc De Hert;Andrew Soundy

  • Promotion of cardiorespiratory fitness in schizophrenia: a clinical overview and meta‐analysis

    D Vancampfort;S Rosenbaum;M Probst;A Soundy

  • The prevalence of pain in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and large‐scale meta‐analysis

    B Stubbs;L Eggermont;A J Mitchell;M De Hert

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of Physical Activity Among Persons With Schizophrenia: A Survey of Physical Therapists

    Andrew Soundy;Brendon Stubbs;Michel Probst;Laura Hemmings

  • The Experience of Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography

    Andrew Soundy;Brendon Stubbs;Carolyn Roskell

  • A meta‐analysis of prevalence estimates and moderators of low bone mass in people with schizophrenia

    Brendon Stubbs;M De Hert;A A Sepehry;C U Correll

  • The transcending benefits of physical activity for individuals with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-ethnography

    Andrew Soundy;Paul Freeman;Brendon Stubbs;Michel Probst

  • Negative symptoms are associated with lower autonomous motivation towards physical activity in people with schizophrenia

    Davy Vancampfort;Marc De Hert;Brendon Stubbs;Philip B. Ward

  • Schizophrenia and the risk of fractures: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis

    Brendon Stubbs;Fiona Gaughran;Alex J. Mitchell;Marc De Hert

  • What are the factors associated with physical activity (PA) participation in community dwelling adults with dementia? A systematic review of PA correlates.

    Brendon Stubbs;Laura Eggermont;Andrew Soundy;Michel Probst

  • Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in outpatients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Andrew Soundy;Martien Wampers;Michel Probst;Marc De Hert

  • Identifying the facilitators and processes which influence recovery in individuals with schizophrenia: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

    Andrew Soundy;Brendon Stubbs;Carolyn Roskell;Sarah E Williams

  • The prevalence and moderators of clinical pain in people with schizophrenia: A systematic review and large scale meta-analysis

    Brendon Stubbs;Alex J. Mitchell;Marc De Hert;Christoph U. Correll

  • The avoidance of activities due to fear of falling contributes to sedentary behavior among community-dwelling older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A multisite observational study

    Brendon Stubbs;Sandhi Patchay;Andy Soundy;Pat A. Schofield

  • PAIN & AGING SECTION Review Article Are Older Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Less Active than Older Adults Without Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Brendon Stubbs;Tarik T. Binnekade;Andy Soundy;Pat Schofield

Frequent Co-Authors

Brendon Stubbs
Brendon Stubbs Medical University of Vienna
Marc De Hert
Marc De Hert KU Leuven
Alex J. Mitchell
Alex J. Mitchell University of Leicester
Guy Faulkner
Guy Faulkner University of British Columbia
Guido Pieters
Guido Pieters KU Leuven
Brett Smith
Brett Smith Durham University
Christoph U. Correll
Christoph U. Correll Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students explore related fields such as Social Work, Counseling, and Human Services to broaden their impact and employability. These areas share core skills in communication, empathy, and research, making them natural extensions for psychology graduates.

When considering career advancement or specialization, choosing the right program is crucial. For example, students interested in Social Work can review the best social work degree programs in Arkansas for strong undergraduate and graduate options. If you are in the Midwest, the best social work degrees in Columbus offer robust training and community engagement opportunities. Those on the Gulf Coast may consider the top social work programs in Houston to launch successful, impactful careers. Even if you are looking towards the Northwest, the best social work degrees in Idaho span traditional and innovative learning pathways.

Exploring related online degrees will allow you to align your psychology studies with specialized, in-demand fields—helping you make a difference in individuals' lives and society as a whole.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Soundy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles