World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicola Veronese

Nicola Veronese

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 106 6438 6057 207 193 599 49206

Nicola Veronese publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicola Veronese between 2010 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicola Veronese published across 17 years, from 2010 to 2026, averaging 58.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 122 publications in 2023. 100 of the 990 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 122. Peak 122 publications in 2023. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 72 publications 2017: 87 publications 2018: 85 publications 2019: 96 publications 2020: 94 publications 2021: 102 publications 2022: 87 publications 2023: 122 publications 2024: 92 publications 2025: 95 publications 2026: 5 publications
2010 2026

990 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicola Veronese: publications per year, 2010 to 2026
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 1
2012 7
2013 7
2014 11
2015 26
2016 72
2017 87
2018 85
2019 96
2020 94
2021 102
2022 87
2023 122
2024 92
2025 95
2026 5
Total 990
Download as CSV

Nicola Veronese publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola Veronese sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 599 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 599
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicola Veronese D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola Veronese sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 106
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicola Veronese is affiliated with the University of Palermo in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant number of publications in subfields such as physiology, geriatrics and gerontology, public health, environmental and occupational health, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology.

The scientist's recent notable papers include:

  • A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020, World Psychiatry)
  • Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) Current Status and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review (2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Other Lifestyle Factors in the Prevention of Cognitive Decline and Dementia (2021, Nutrients)
  • A multidimensional approach to frailty in older people (2020, Ageing Research Reviews)
  • Magnesium in Aging, Health and Diseases (2021, Nutrients)

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Lee Smith, Mario Barbagallo, Ai Koyanagi, Pınar Soysal, and Ligia J. Domínguez.

Nicola Veronese often publishes in venues such as Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, Nutrients, Ageing Research Reviews, Journal of Affective Disorders, and Experimental Gerontology.

Their work covers a range of topics including frailty in older adults, nutrition and health in aging, health systems and economic evaluations related to quality of life, nutritional studies and diet, health disparities and outcomes, osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms, and bone health and osteoporosis research.

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to book publications with Springer International Publishing and Springer Nature. These include titles such as Sarcopenia (2021), The Role of Family Physicians in Older People Care (2021), and Frailty and Cardiovascular Diseases (2020).

Best Publications

  • Prevalence, incidence and mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with pooled and specific severe mental illness: a large-scale meta-analysis of 3,211,768 patients and 113,383,368 controls.

    Christoph U. Correll;Marco Solmi;Nicola Veronese;Beatrice Bortolato

  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness

    Joseph Firth;Joseph Firth;Joseph Firth;Najma Siddiqi;Ai Koyanagi;Ai Koyanagi;Ai Koyanagi;Dan J Siskind

  • Peripheral cytokine and chemokine alterations in depression: a meta-analysis of 82 studies.

    C. A. Köhler;T. H. Freitas;M. Maes;N. Q. De Andrade

  • Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) Current Status and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.

    Francesco Di Gennaro;Damiano Pizzol;Claudia Marotta;Mario Antunes

  • Inflammation and frailty in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Pinar Soysal;Brendon Stubbs;Paola Lucato;Claudio Luchini

  • Inflammation and sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Giulia Bano;Caterina Trevisan;Sara Carraro;Marco Solmi

  • Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture

    Nicola Veronese;Stefania Maggi

  • EPA guidance on physical activity as a treatment for severe mental illness: a meta-review of the evidence and Position Statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the International Organization of Physical Therapists in Mental Health (IOPTMH).

    Brendon Stubbs;Brendon Stubbs;Davy Vancampfort;Mats Hallgren;Joseph Firth

  • Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale

    Claudio Luchini;Brendon Stubbs;Marco Solmi;Nicola Veronese

  • Relationship between depression and frailty in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Pinar Soysal;Nicola Veronese;Trevor Thompson;Kai G Kahl

  • An examination of the anxiolytic effects of exercise for people with anxiety and stress-related disorders: A meta-analysis

    Brendon Stubbs;Brendon Stubbs;Davy Vancampfort;Simon Rosenbaum;Joseph Firth

  • Nutrition and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia: systematic review.

    Charlotte Beaudart;Charlotte Beaudart;A. Dawson;S. C. Shaw;Nicholas C. Harvey

  • An updated algorithm recommendation for the management of knee osteoarthritis from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO)

    Olivier Bruyère;Germain Honvo;Nicola Veronese;Nigel K. Arden

  • High prevalence of erectile dysfunction in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 studies

    Y Kouidrat;D Pizzol;T Cosco;T Thompson

  • Peripheral Alterations in Cytokine and Chemokine Levels After Antidepressant Drug Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Cristiano A. Köhler;Thiago H. Freitas;Brendan Stubbs;Brendan Stubbs;Michael Maes

  • Safety, tolerability, and risks associated with first- and second-generation antipsychotics: a state-of-the-art clinical review

    Marco Solmi;Andrea Murru;Isabella Pacchiarotti;Juan Undurraga

  • Decreased Consumption of Branched-Chain Amino Acids Improves Metabolic Health

    Luigi Fontana;Luigi Fontana;Nicole E. Cummings;Sebastian I. Arriola Apelo;Joshua C. Neuman

  • Three Decades of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Evidence Coming From Different Healthcare Settings and Specific Clinical Conditions

    Alberto Pilotto;Alberto Cella;Andrea Pilotto;Julia Daragjati

  • Dietary fiber and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

    Nicola Veronese;Marco Solmi;Maria Gabriella Caruso;Gianluigi Giannelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Brendon Stubbs
Brendon Stubbs Medical University of Vienna
Lee Smith
Lee Smith Anglia Ruskin University
Marco Solmi
Marco Solmi University of Ottawa
Ai Koyanagi
Ai Koyanagi University of Barcelona
Stefania Maggi
Stefania Maggi National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Joseph Firth
Joseph Firth University of Manchester
André F. Carvalho
André F. Carvalho Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Jean-Yves Reginster
Jean-Yves Reginster University of Liège
Gaetano Crepaldi
Gaetano Crepaldi University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but want flexible or alternative routes, online degrees offer accessible opportunities. For example, online psych np programs can help you become a psychiatric nurse practitioner, filling a growing demand for mental health professionals.

Administration is another critical part of healthcare. Many students are choosing online healthcare administration programs to gain leadership skills needed to manage medical facilities. If cost is a concern, you can explore the cheapest mha programs online healthcare paths for more affordable options.

For those aiming for top-level nursing roles, there are also cheap dnp online programs that lead to the highest degree in nursing practice. These flexible programs allow you to advance your career while balancing work or family commitments.

Online degrees can help you diversify your skills or pursue new career pathways within the fast-evolving healthcare industry, all while offering flexibility and cost-effective options.

Best Scientists Citing Nicola Veronese

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles