World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel L. Marks

Daniel L. Marks

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 54 3251 3111 961 876 259 9575

Daniel L. Marks publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel L. Marks between 1998 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel L. Marks published across 23 years, from 1998 to 2020, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2004. 10 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2004. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 2 publications
1998 2020

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel L. Marks: publications per year, 1998 to 2020
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 6
2000 2
2001 1
2002 6
2003 14
2004 25
2005 14
2006 18
2007 15
2008 16
2009 13
2010 8
2011 19
2012 15
2013 22
2014 15
2015 5
2016 9
2017 21
2018 12
2019 8
2020 2
Total 269
Download as CSV

Daniel L. Marks publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Marks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 258–267 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 259 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240 259
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel L. Marks D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Marks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195 54
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel L. Marks is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the field of Engineering, with a focus on subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Surgery, and Acoustics and Ultrasonics.

Their recent scholarly output includes publications centered around optical coherence tomography and related biomedical imaging techniques, as well as microwave imaging and metasurface technologies. Notable papers by Daniel L. Marks include:

  • Passive microwave spectral imaging with dynamic metasurface apertures, 2020, published in Optica
  • Symphotic Multiplexing Medium at Microwave Frequencies, 2020, published in Physical Review Applied
  • Flexible Fortschrittssteuerung als Target Operating Model der finanziellen Führung, 2021, published in Controlling
  • Inversion of displacement fields to quantify the magnetic particle distribution in homogeneous elastic media from magnetomotive ultrasound, 2023, published in UNC Libraries
  • Diffusion tensor optical coherence tomography, 2023, published in UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel L. Marks cover a range of researchers with whom multiple papers have been co-authored. These include:

  • Amy L. Oldenburg
  • David R. Smith
  • Stephen A. Boppart
  • Aaron V. Diebold
  • Mohammadreza F. Imani

The primary venues where Daniel L. Marks has published reflect a combination of interdisciplinary engineering and biomedical journals and repositories. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Optica
  • Physical Review Applied
  • Controlling

Research topics covered in their work are diverse but exhibit a particular focus on optical and microwave imaging technologies as well as biomedical applications. Key topics include:

  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Random lasers and scattering media
  • Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
  • Terahertz technology and applications
  • Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
  • Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

Best Publications

  • Optical coherence tomography: a review of clinical development from bench to bedside

    Adam M. Zysk;Freddy T. Nguyen;Amy L. Oldenburg;Daniel L. Marks

  • Interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy

    Tyler S. Ralston;Daniel L. Marks;P. Scott Carney;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Optical coherence tomography: feasibility for basic research and image-guided surgery of breast cancer.

    Stephen A. Boppart;Wei Luo;Daniel L. Marks;Keith W. Singletary

  • Engineered microsphere contrast agents for optical coherence tomography.

    Tin Man Lee;Amy L. Oldenburg;Shoeb Sitafalwalla;Daniel L. Marks

  • Nonlinear Interferometric Vibrational Imaging and Spectroscopy

    Haohua Tu;Zhi Jiang;Praveen D. Chowdary;Wladimir Benalcazar

  • Large Metasurface Aperture for Millimeter Wave Computational Imaging at the Human-Scale.

    Jonah Gollub;Okan Yurduseven;Kenneth P. Trofatter;Daniel Arnitz

  • Metamaterial apertures for coherent computational imaging on the physical layer.

    Guy Lipworth;Alex Mrozack;John Hunt;Daniel L Marks

  • Near-infrared dyes as contrast-enhancing agents for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography

    Chenyang Xu;Jian Ye;Daniel L. Marks;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Optical probes and techniques for molecular contrast enhancement in coherence imaging

    Stephen A. Boppart;Amy L. Oldenburg;Chenyang Xu;Daniel L. Marks

  • Inverse scattering for optical coherence tomography

    Tyler S. Ralston;Daniel L. Marks;P. Scott Carney;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Nonlinear interferometric vibrational imaging.

    Daniel L. Marks;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Study of an ultrahigh-numerical-aperture fiber continuum generation source for optical coherence tomography.

    Daniel L. Marks;Amy L. Oldenburg;J. Joshua Reynolds;Stephen A. Boppart

  • High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of biofilm development using optical coherence tomography.

    Chuanwu Xi;Daniel L. Marks;Simon Schlachter;Wei Luo

  • Nonlinear optical contrast enhancement for optical coherence tomography.

    Claudio Vinegoni;Jeremy S. Bredfeldt;Daniel L. Marks;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Digital algorithm for dispersion correction in optical coherence tomography for homogeneous and stratified media.

    Daniel L. Marks;Amy Lynn Oldenburg;J. Joshua Reynolds;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Dynamically reconfigurable holographic metasurface aperture for a Mills-Cross monochromatic microwave camera

    Okan Yurduseven;Daniel L Marks;Thomas Fromenteze;David R Smith

  • Frequency-diverse microwave imaging using planar Mills-Cross cavity apertures

    Okan Yurduseven;Jonah N. Gollub;Daniel L. Marks;David R. Smith

  • Functional optical coherence tomography for detecting neural activity through scattering changes.

    Mariya Lazebnik;Daniel L. Marks;Kurt Potgieter;Rhanor Gillette

  • Autofocus algorithm for dispersion correction in optical coherence tomography.

    Daniel L. Marks;Amy L. Oldenburg;J. Joshua Reynolds;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Separation of absorption and scattering profiles in spectroscopic optical coherence tomography using a least-squares algorithm

    Chenyang Xu;Daniel L. Marks;Minh N. Do;Stephen A. Boppart

  • Interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy

    P. Scott Carney;Brynmor J. Davis;Daniel L. Marks;Tyler S. Ralston

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen A. Boppart
Stephen A. Boppart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David J. Brady
David J. Brady University of Arizona
David R. Smith
David R. Smith Duke University
Okan Yurduseven
Okan Yurduseven Queen's University Belfast
Jonah N. Gollub
Jonah N. Gollub Duke University
Jungsang Kim
Jungsang Kim Duke University
Kenneth S. Suslick
Kenneth S. Suslick University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Henry O. Everitt
Henry O. Everitt Duke University
Mohammadreza F. Imani
Mohammadreza F. Imani Arizona State University
Joseph E. Ford
Joseph E. Ford University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel L. Marks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles