World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonah N. Gollub

Jonah N. Gollub

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Electronics and Electrical Engineering 33 6154 5910 2036 1899 80 3662

Jonah N. Gollub publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonah N. Gollub between 2005 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonah N. Gollub published across 18 years, from 2005 to 2022, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 3 of the 81 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
2005 2022

81 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonah N. Gollub: publications per year, 2005 to 2022
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 4
2009 3
2010 0
2011 1
2012 7
2013 3
2014 1
2015 10
2016 14
2017 18
2018 5
2019 1
2020 5
2021 2
2022 1
Total 81
Download as CSV

Jonah N. Gollub publication distribution in Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonah N. Gollub sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 34–53 to 1,065+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 445. Most scientists, 445, have 174–193 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,065 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 34–53 publications: 24 scientists 54–73 publications: 52 scientists 74–93 publications: 114 scientists 94–113 publications: 203 scientists 114–133 publications: 269 scientists 134–153 publications: 355 scientists 154–173 publications: 403 scientists 174–193 publications: 445 scientists 194–213 publications: 430 scientists 214–233 publications: 431 scientists 234–253 publications: 399 scientists 254–273 publications: 366 scientists 274–293 publications: 335 scientists 294–313 publications: 300 scientists 314–333 publications: 276 scientists 334–353 publications: 250 scientists 354–373 publications: 214 scientists 374–393 publications: 187 scientists 394–413 publications: 152 scientists 414–433 publications: 169 scientists 434–453 publications: 147 scientists 454–473 publications: 111 scientists 474–493 publications: 117 scientists 494–513 publications: 103 scientists 514–533 publications: 99 scientists 534–553 publications: 92 scientists 554–573 publications: 75 scientists 574–593 publications: 58 scientists 594–613 publications: 69 scientists 614–633 publications: 50 scientists 634–653 publications: 62 scientists 654–673 publications: 54 scientists 674–693 publications: 44 scientists 694–713 publications: 37 scientists 714–733 publications: 28 scientists 734–753 publications: 26 scientists 754–773 publications: 26 scientists 774–793 publications: 19 scientists 794–813 publications: 23 scientists 814–833 publications: 20 scientists 834–853 publications: 16 scientists 854–873 publications: 20 scientists 874–893 publications: 11 scientists 894–913 publications: 11 scientists 914–933 publications: 16 scientists 934–953 publications: 13 scientists 954–973 publications: 10 scientists 974–993 publications: 11 scientists 994–1,013 publications: 9 scientists 1,014–1,033 publications: 9 scientists 1,034–1,053 publications: 10 scientists 1,054–1,064 publications: 6 scientists 1,065+ publications: 99 scientists
34–53 publications 1,065+

This scientist: 80 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,065 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,875 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
34–53 24
54–73 52
74–93 114 80
94–113 203
114–133 269
134–153 355
154–173 403
174–193 445
194–213 430
214–233 431
234–253 399
254–273 366
274–293 335
294–313 300
314–333 276
334–353 250
354–373 214
374–393 187
394–413 152
414–433 169
434–453 147
454–473 111
474–493 117
494–513 103
514–533 99
534–553 92
554–573 75
574–593 58
594–613 69
614–633 50
634–653 62
654–673 54
674–693 44
694–713 37
714–733 28
734–753 26
754–773 26
774–793 19
794–813 23
814–833 20
834–853 16
854–873 20
874–893 11
894–913 11
914–933 16
934–953 13
954–973 10
974–993 11
994–1,013 9
1,014–1,033 9
1,034–1,053 10
1,054–1,064 6
1,065+ 99
Download as CSV

Jonah N. Gollub D-index placement in Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonah N. Gollub sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 111+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 263. Most scientists, 263, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 111 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 178 scientists 31 D-Index: 257 scientists 32 D-Index: 263 scientists 33 D-Index: 262 scientists 34 D-Index: 244 scientists 35 D-Index: 236 scientists 36 D-Index: 211 scientists 37 D-Index: 220 scientists 38 D-Index: 214 scientists 39 D-Index: 214 scientists 40 D-Index: 205 scientists 41 D-Index: 187 scientists 42 D-Index: 194 scientists 43 D-Index: 201 scientists 44 D-Index: 155 scientists 45 D-Index: 189 scientists 46 D-Index: 148 scientists 47 D-Index: 160 scientists 48 D-Index: 134 scientists 49 D-Index: 130 scientists 50 D-Index: 141 scientists 51 D-Index: 156 scientists 52 D-Index: 108 scientists 53 D-Index: 130 scientists 54 D-Index: 112 scientists 55 D-Index: 97 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 102 scientists 58 D-Index: 108 scientists 59 D-Index: 120 scientists 60 D-Index: 103 scientists 61 D-Index: 93 scientists 62 D-Index: 92 scientists 63 D-Index: 74 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 73 scientists 66 D-Index: 64 scientists 67 D-Index: 69 scientists 68 D-Index: 60 scientists 69 D-Index: 39 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 59 scientists 72 D-Index: 46 scientists 73 D-Index: 49 scientists 74 D-Index: 38 scientists 75 D-Index: 35 scientists 76 D-Index: 32 scientists 77 D-Index: 35 scientists 78 D-Index: 31 scientists 79 D-Index: 22 scientists 80 D-Index: 34 scientists 81 D-Index: 31 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 23 scientists 84 D-Index: 18 scientists 85 D-Index: 30 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 20 scientists 89 D-Index: 8 scientists 90 D-Index: 17 scientists 91 D-Index: 7 scientists 92 D-Index: 14 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 10 scientists 98 D-Index: 10 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 16 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 8 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 13 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 5 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 8 scientists 111+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 111+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 111 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,875 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 178
31 257
32 263
33 262 33
34 244
35 236
36 211
37 220
38 214
39 214
40 205
41 187
42 194
43 201
44 155
45 189
46 148
47 160
48 134
49 130
50 141
51 156
52 108
53 130
54 112
55 97
56 111
57 102
58 108
59 120
60 103
61 93
62 92
63 74
64 77
65 73
66 64
67 69
68 60
69 39
70 57
71 59
72 46
73 49
74 38
75 35
76 32
77 35
78 31
79 22
80 34
81 31
82 34
83 23
84 18
85 30
86 19
87 19
88 20
89 8
90 17
91 7
92 14
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 12
97 10
98 10
99 12
100 16
101 5
102 7
103 7
104 8
105 9
106 13
107 4
108 5
109 10
110 8
111+ 96
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Large Metasurface Aperture for Millimeter Wave Computational Imaging at the Human-Scale.

    Jonah Gollub;Okan Yurduseven;Kenneth P. Trofatter;Daniel Arnitz

  • Dynamic metamaterial aperture for microwave imaging

    Timothy Sleasman;Mohammadreza F. Imani;Jonah N. Gollub;David R. Smith

  • Review of Metasurface Antennas for Computational Microwave Imaging

    Mohammadreza F. Imani;Jonah N. Gollub;Okan Yurduseven;Aaron V. Diebold

  • Metamaterial microwave holographic imaging system

    John Hunt;Jonah Gollub;Tom Driscoll;Guy Lipworth

  • Computational imaging using a mode-mixing cavity at microwave frequencies

    Thomas Fromenteze;Okan Yurduseven;Mohammadreza F. Imani;Jonah Gollub

  • Comprehensive simulation platform for a metamaterial imaging system.

    Guy Lipworth;Alec Rose;Okan Yurduseven;Vinay R. Gowda

  • Calculation and measurement of bianisotropy in a split ring resonator metamaterial

    David R. Smith;Jonah Gollub;Jack J. Mock;Willie J. Padilla

  • Resolution of the Frequency Diverse Metamaterial Aperture Imager

    Okan Yurduseven;Mohammadreza F. Imani;Hayrettin Odabasi;Jonah Gollub

  • Microwave Imaging Using a Disordered Cavity with a Dynamically Tunable Impedance Surface

    Timothy Sleasman;Mohammadreza F. Imani;Jonah N. Gollub;David R. Smith

  • Design considerations for a dynamic metamaterial aperture for computational imaging at microwave frequencies

    Timothy Sleasman;Michael Boyarsky;Mohammadreza F. Imani;Jonah N. Gollub

  • Frequency-diverse microwave imaging using planar Mills-Cross cavity apertures

    Okan Yurduseven;Jonah N. Gollub;Daniel L. Marks;David R. Smith

  • Printed Aperiodic Cavity for Computational and Microwave Imaging

    Okan Yurduseven;Vinay R. Gowda;Jonah N. Gollub;David R. Smith

  • Experimental characterization of magnetic surface plasmons on metamaterials with negative permeability

    Jonah N. Gollub;Jonah N. Gollub;David R. Smith;David R. Smith;David C. Vier;Tim Perram

  • Characterization of complementary electric field coupled resonant surfaces

    Thomas H. Hand;Jonah Gollub;Soji Sajuyigbe;David R. Smith

  • Design and Simulation of a Frequency-Diverse Aperture for Imaging of Human-Scale Targets

    Okan Yurduseven;Jonah N. Gollub;Alec Rose;Daniel L. Marks

  • Single-frequency microwave imaging with dynamic metasurface apertures

    Timothy Sleasman;Michael Boyarsky;Mohammadreza F. Imani;Thomas Fromenteze

  • Electronically steered metasurface antenna.

    Michael Boyarsky;Timothy Sleasman;Mohammadreza F. Imani;Jonah N. Gollub

  • Spatially resolving antenna arrays using frequency diversity.

    Daniel L Marks;Jonah Gollub;David R Smith

  • Design and Analysis of a Reconfigurable Holographic Metasurface Aperture for Dynamic Focusing in the Fresnel Zone

    Okan Yurduseven;Daniel L. Marks;Jonah N. Gollub;David R. Smith

  • An efficient broadband metamaterial wave retarder

    Jessie Y. Chin;Jonah N. Gollub;Jack J. Mock;Ruopeng Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Smith
David R. Smith Duke University
Okan Yurduseven
Okan Yurduseven Queen's University Belfast
Daniel L. Marks
Daniel L. Marks Duke University
Mohammadreza F. Imani
Mohammadreza F. Imani Arizona State University
Jack J. Mock
Jack J. Mock Duke University
Matthew S. Reynolds
Matthew S. Reynolds University of Washington
Ricardo Marqués
Ricardo Marqués University of Seville
David J. Brady
David J. Brady University of Arizona
Tie Jun Cui
Tie Jun Cui Southeast University
Benjamin J. Wiley
Benjamin J. Wiley Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Electronics and Electrical Engineering, flexible learning options are increasingly important. Many universities now offer degree programs for working adults, enabling students to balance professional commitments while advancing their education. This flexibility is crucial for engineers who want to upgrade their skills without pausing their careers.

Furthermore, aspiring educators in the engineering field may explore the best online master's for teaching, which help develop effective instructional skills tailored to STEM subjects. These programs support career transitions into academic or training roles.

Competency-based learning is another growing trend. Institutions offering competency based universities prioritize mastery of skills rather than time spent in class, making it an ideal pathway for self-motivated learners wanting to accelerate their degree completion.

Online education also provides valuable options for military families. The best online college for military spouses supports those facing frequent relocations, offering stability and continuity in pursuing engineering degrees through accessible, flexible coursework.

Best Scientists Citing Jonah N. Gollub

Recently Published Articles