World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 67 2673 2461 1279 1168 121 15674

Steven S. Wasserman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven S. Wasserman between 1975 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven S. Wasserman published across 46 years, from 1975 to 2020, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1992. 1 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1992. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1975 2020

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven S. Wasserman: publications per year, 1975 to 2020
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 2
1981 3
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 5
1990 4
1991 6
1992 12
1993 12
1994 6
1995 8
1996 7
1997 5
1998 6
1999 6
2000 7
2001 5
2002 2
2003 9
2004 2
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 124
Download as CSV

Steven S. Wasserman publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven S. Wasserman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 121 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108 121
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven S. Wasserman D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven S. Wasserman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167 67
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven S. Wasserman is a researcher affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their work is primarily situated within the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with a focus on Epidemiology, Health, and Hepatology as subfields of study.

Their recent publication includes the article titled The SENIEUR protocol and the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination in healthy elderly persons by age, gender, and vaccine route, published in 2020 in the journal Immunity & Ageing. This paper has contributed to understanding vaccine response variations among different demographic groups.

Wasserman's research themes prominently cover the following topics:

  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Hepatitis C virus research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Wasserman include:

  • Robert Edelman
  • Meagan E. Deming
  • Franklin R. Toapanta
  • M. Heuser
  • Lisa Chrisley

Their publications have appeared primarily in the venue Immunity & Ageing, reflecting a targeted engagement with immunological and aging research communities.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: A large multicenter study

    Alessio Fasano;Irene Berti;Tania Gerarduzzi;Tarcisio Not

  • Vibrio cholerae produces a second enterotoxin, which affects intestinal tight junctions.

    A Fasano;B Baudry;D W Pumplin;S S Wasserman

  • A critical appraisal of 98.6 degrees F, the upper limit of the normal body temperature, and other legacies of Carl Reinhold August Wunderlich.

    Philip A. Mackowiak;Steven S. Wasserman;Myron M. Levine

  • Cardiac troponin T and C-reactive protein for predicting prognosis, coronary atherosclerosis, and cardiomyopathy in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis.

    Christopher DeFilippi;Steven Wasserman;Salvatore Rosanio;Eric Tiblier

  • Phase II safety and immunogenicity study of live chikungunya virus vaccine TSI-GSD-218

    R Edelman;C O Tacket;S S Wasserman;S A Bodison

  • Role of the eaeA gene in experimental enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection.

    M S Donnenberg;C O Tacket;S P James;G Losonsky

  • Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Chile: Vegetables May Serve as One Route of Transmission

    R. J. Hopkins;P. A. Vial;C. Ferreccio;J. Ovalle

  • Determinants of HIV-1 shedding in the genital tract of women.

    Andrea Kovacs;Steven S Wasserman;David Burns;David J Wright

  • Safety of live oral Salmonella typhi vaccine strains with deletions in htrA and aroC aroD and immune response in humans.

    Carol O. Tacket;Marcelo B. Sztein;Genevieve A. Losonsky;Steven S. Wasserman

  • Humoral, mucosal, and cellular immune responses to oral Norwalk virus-like particles in volunteers.

    Carol O Tacket;Marcelo B Sztein;Genevieve A Losonsky;Steven S Wasserman

  • REDUCTION OF TRANSMISSION OF SHIGELLOSIS BY CONTROL OF HOUSEFLIES (MUSCA DOMESTICA)

    D Cohen;M Green;C Block;R Slepon

  • Efficacy trial of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in North Jakarta, Indonesia, a cholera-endemic area.

    Emily Richie;Narain H Punjabi;Yuwono Sidharta;Kenny Peetosutan

  • Safety and Immunogenicity of Oral Inactivated Whole-Cell Helicobacter pylori Vaccine with Adjuvant among Volunteers with or without Subclinical Infection

    Karen L. Kotloff;Marcelo B. Sztein;Steven S. Wasserman;Genevieve A. Losonsky

  • Phase I trial of 16 formulations of a tetravalent live-attenuated dengue vaccine.

    Robert Edelman;Steven S. Wasserman;Sacared A. Bodison;Robert J. Putnak

  • Epidemiologic studies of Escherichia coli diarrheal infections in a low socioeconomic level peri-urban community in Santiago, Chile.

    Myron M. Levine;Catterine Ferreccio;Valeria Prado;Marisol Cayazzo

  • Phase 2 clinical trial of attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi oral live vector vaccine CVD 908-htrA in U.S. Volunteers

    Carol O. Tacket;Marcelo B. Sztein;Steven S. Wasserman;Genevieve Losonsky

  • Role of Vibrio cholerae neuraminidase in the function of cholera toxin.

    J E Galen;J M Ketley;A Fasano;S H Richardson

  • Safety and immunogenicity of increasing doses of a Clostridium difficile toxoid vaccine administered to healthy adults.

    Karen L. Kotloff;Steven S. Wasserman;Genevieve A. Losonsky;William Thomas

  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentered trial of the efficacy of a single dose of live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in preventing cholera following challenge with Vibrio cholerae O1 El tor inaba three months after vaccination.

    Carol O. Tacket;Mitchell B. Cohen;Steven S. Wasserman;Genevieve Losonsky

  • Optimization of plasmid maintenance in the attenuated live vector vaccine strain Salmonella typhi CVD 908-htrA.

    James E. Galen;Jay Nair;Jin Yuang Wang;Steven S. Wasserman

  • Safety of Live OralSalmonella typhiVaccine Strains with Deletions inhtrAandaroC aroDand Immune Response in Humans

    Carol O. Tacket;Marcelo B. Sztein;Genevieve A. Losonsky;Steven S. Wasserman

Frequent Co-Authors

Myron M. Levine
Myron M. Levine University of Maryland, Baltimore
Genevieve Losonsky
Genevieve Losonsky University of Maryland, Baltimore
Robert R. Edelman
Robert R. Edelman Northwestern University
Karen L. Kotloff
Karen L. Kotloff University of Maryland, Baltimore
Carol O. Tacket
Carol O. Tacket University of Maryland, Baltimore
Marcelo B. Sztein
Marcelo B. Sztein University of Maryland, Baltimore
Stanley J. Cryz
Stanley J. Cryz University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
James P. Nataro
James P. Nataro University of Virginia
David N. Taylor
David N. Taylor Johns Hopkins University
Alessio Fasano
Alessio Fasano Mead Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond immunology, pursuing nursing-focused education can open diverse career pathways. For example, many professionals look into acute care nurse practitioner programs to specialize in managing complex conditions in critical care settings. These programs prepare nurses for advanced roles in hospital environments, complementing immunological knowledge with acute patient management.

Accelerated options provide a faster route into nursing leadership and practice. The accelerated nurse practitioner programs offer intensive curriculums designed for those with prior degrees, making it easier to transition quickly into advanced practice roles. These programs often emphasize flexibility through online platforms, ideal for working professionals.

If you’re starting fresh without a nursing background, exploring the best online RN programs for non nurses can help you earn foundational nursing credentials remotely. These programs typically combine theory, clinical practice, and online coursework for a balanced education.

Additionally, candidates seeking straightforward admissions may find absn programs with high acceptance rates appealing. These accelerated bachelor’s programs provide efficient access to nursing degrees and facilitate quick entry into healthcare professions, ideal for those pivoting into nursing from other fields.

Best Scientists Citing Steven S. Wasserman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles