World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
52
Citations
17121
World Ranking
2380
National Ranking
1154

Julie Taylor publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Taylor sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 307 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Julie Taylor D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie Taylor is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with notable contributions in Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health, and Safety Research.

The main topics of their work encompass:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Homelessness and Social Issues

Julie Taylor has co-authored extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Caroline Bradbury-Jones
  • Gayathri Delanerolle
  • Peter Phiri
  • Sharron Hinchliff
  • Lucky Saraswat

Their recent publications demonstrate a range of topics mostly related to public health, domestic violence, child protection, and breastfeeding. These include:

  • "Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting" (2021), published in International Journal of Social Research Methodology
  • "COVID-19: a public health approach to manage domestic violence is needed" (2020), published in The Lancet Public Health
  • "Risk of Cardiometabolic Disease and All-Cause Mortality in Female Survivors of Domestic Abuse" (2020), published in Journal of the American Heart Association
  • "Evidence-Based Updates on the First Week of Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Infants ≥35 Weeks" (2020), published in PEDIATRICS
  • "Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on child protection medical assessments: a retrospective observational study in Birmingham, UK" (2020), published in BMJ Open

Julie Taylor has frequently published in a variety of academic venues. The publication venues with the highest number of contributions include:

  • Preprints.org
  • BMJ Open
  • Child Abuse Review
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants

    Bin Zhou;Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco;Goodarz Danaei;Leanne M Riley

  • Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection

    R. Erbel;F. Alfonso;C. Boileau;O. Dirsch

  • Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial.

    Ian J Jacobs;Ian J Jacobs;Ian J Jacobs;Usha Menon;Andy Ryan;Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj

  • Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial

    Denice S Feig;Denice S Feig;Lois E Donovan;Rosa Corcoy;Kellie E Murphy;Kellie E Murphy

  • Ovarian Cancer Population Screening and Mortality After Long-Term Follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): A Randomised Controlled Trial

    Usha Menon;Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj;Matthew Burnell;Naveena Singh

  • Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries and territories: a pooled analysis of 2181 population-based studies with 65 million participants

    Andrea Rodriguez-Martinez;Bin Zhou;Marisa K. Sophiea;James Bentham

  • Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions

    Mary Wells;Brian Williams;Shaun Treweek;Joanne Coyle

  • Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting

    Caroline Bradbury-Jones;Helen Aveyard;Oliver Rudolf Herber;Louise Isham

  • Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol

    Cristina Taddei;Bin Zhou;Honor Bixby;Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco

  • Engaging with children as co-researchers: challenges,counter-challenges and solutions

    Caroline Bradbury-Jones;Julie Taylor

  • Energy Expenditure During Physically Interactive Video Game Playing in Male College Students With Different Playing Experience

    Katie Sell;Tia Lillie;Julie Taylor

  • How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology

    Caroline Bradbury-Jones;Julie Taylor;Oliver Herber

  • COVID-19: a public health approach to manage domestic violence is needed.

    Joht Singh Chandan;Julie Taylor;Caroline Bradbury-Jones;Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar

  • The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review

    Caroline Bradbury-Jones;Louise Isham;Julie Taylor

  • An integrative literature review of student retention in programmes of nursing and midwifery education: why do students stay?

    Joan Cameron;Michelle Roxburgh;Julie Taylor;William Lauder

  • Vignette development and administration: a framework for protecting research participants

    Caroline Bradbury-Jones;Julie Taylor;O.R Herber

  • The myths surrounding people with albinism in South Africa and Zimbabwe

    Charlotte Baker;Patricia Lund;Richard Nyathi;Julie Taylor

  • Female survivors of intimate partner violence and risk of depression, anxiety and serious mental illness

    Joht Singh Chandan;Tom Thomas;Caroline Bradbury-Jones;Rebecca Russell

  • Women's Health Research: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promise

    Julie Smith Taylor

  • Integrating Trauma-Informed Care Into Maternity Care Practice: Conceptual and Practical Issues.

    Mickey Sperlich;Julia S. Seng;Yang Li;Julie Taylor

  • Heterogeneous contributions of change in population distribution of body mass index to change in obesity and underweight

    Maria Lc Iurilli;Bin Zhou;James E Bennett

Frequent Co-Authors

Caroline Bradbury-Jones
Caroline Bradbury-Jones University of Birmingham
Derek K. Jones
Derek K. Jones Cardiff University
Jeannette Littlemore
Jeannette Littlemore University of Birmingham
Jaakko Tuomilehto
Jaakko Tuomilehto University of Helsinki
Kurt Widhalm
Kurt Widhalm Medical University of Vienna
Terho Lehtimäki
Terho Lehtimäki Tampere University
Vincenzo Solfrizzi
Vincenzo Solfrizzi University of Bari Aldo Moro
Ulf Ekelund
Ulf Ekelund Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Seppo Koskinen
Seppo Koskinen Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Martina Müller-Nurasyid
Martina Müller-Nurasyid Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education is transforming how students access degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities. Many institutions in the USA now offer flexible, budget-friendly programs that fit a variety of lifestyles and career ambitions.

For those interested in social work, exploring the cheapest msw programs allows students to pursue their passion for helping others without accruing big debts. Professionals looking to step into behavioral analysis may consider reputable online bcba masters programs, which combine convenience with cost-efficiency.

Accelerated learning is also in high demand. Students eager to make an impact sooner can review msw accelerated programs for faster completion. Similarly, those focusing on human behavior and mental health might opt for a quick entry into the field with an accelerated psychology degree.

With these pathways, individuals can match their studies with career goals—whether in counseling, advocacy, education, or research—with more flexibility than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles