World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Anett Gyurak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anett Gyurak between 2007 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anett Gyurak published across 11 years, from 2007 to 2017, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2012. 6 of the 39 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2012. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications
2007 2017

39 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anett Gyurak: publications per year, 2007 to 2017
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 4
2009 4
2010 4
2011 2
2012 7
2013 4
2014 2
2015 5
2016 4
2017 2
Total 39
Download as CSV

Anett Gyurak publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anett Gyurak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anett Gyurak D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anett Gyurak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anett Gyurak is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research activities associated with this institution.

Available data does not specify particular fields of study, subfields, or main topics of their research. Additionally, no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are listed in the available information.

There is no record of book publications or awards associated with Anett Gyurak in the data provided. The absence of detailed publication data means that specific contributions to academic literature cannot be outlined at this time.

Without specific details on research themes or collaborative networks, the profile is limited to noting the current institutional association. Further information would be required for a more comprehensive overview of their scientific work.

Best Publications

  • Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework.

    Anett Gyurak;James J. Gross;Amit Etkin

  • Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues

    Kathy R. Berenson;Anett Gyurak;Özlem Ayduk;Geraldine Downey

  • Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life.

    Jocelyn A. Sze;Anett Gyurak;Madeleine S. Goodkind;Robert W. Levenson

  • Individual differences in the rejection-aggression link in the hot sauce paradigm: The case of Rejection Sensitivity.

    Özlem Ayduk;Anett Gyurak;Anna Luerssen

  • Coherence between emotional experience and physiology: Does body awareness training have an impact?

    Jocelyn A. Sze;Anett Gyurak;Joyce W. Yuan;Robert W. Levenson

  • The ability to regulate emotion is associated with greater well-being, income, and socioeconomic status.

    Stéphane Côté;Anett Gyurak;Robert W. Levenson

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment on cognitive impairments associated with depression: a randomised longitudinal study

    Carrie Shilyansky;Leanne M Williams;Leanne M Williams;Anett Gyurak;Anett Gyurak;Anthony Harris

  • Executive functions and the down-regulation and up-regulation of emotion

    Anett Gyurak;Madeleine S. Goodkind;Joel H. Kramer;Bruce L. Miller

  • A neurobiological approach to the cognitive deficits of psychiatric disorders.

    Amit Etkin;Anett Gyurak;Ruth O'Hara

  • Neural basis of interpersonal traits in neurodegenerative diseases.

    Marc Sollberger;Christine M. Stanley;Stephen M. Wilson;Anett Gyurak

  • Sources of occupational stress among nurses in five countries

    Sharon Glazer;Anett Gyurak

  • Do tests of executive functioning predict ability to downregulate emotions spontaneously and when instructed to suppress

    Anett Gyurak;Madeleine S. Goodkind;Anita Madan;Joel H. Kramer

  • The International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D): Outcomes from the acute phase of antidepressant treatment

    Radu Saveanu;Amit Etkin;Amit Etkin;Anne Marie Duchemin;Andrea Goldstein-Piekarski;Andrea Goldstein-Piekarski

  • Resting Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Buffers Against Rejection Sensitivity via Emotion Control

    Anett Gyurak;Özlem Ayduk

  • Rejection Sensitivity Moderates the Impact of Rejection on Self-Concept Clarity

    Özlem Ayduk;Anett Gyurak;Anna Luerssen

  • Frontoparietal Activation During Response Inhibition Predicts Remission to Antidepressants in Patients With Major Depression

    Anett Gyurak;Brian Patenaude;Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar;Stuart M. Grieve

  • Aging and emotion recognition: not just a losing matter.

    Jocelyn A. Sze;Madeleine S. Goodkind;Anett Gyurak;Robert W. Levenson

  • Tracking Emotional Valence: The Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex

    Madeleine S. Goodkind;Marc Sollberger;Marc Sollberger;Anett Gyurak;Anett Gyurak;Howard J. Rosen;Howard J. Rosen

  • Defensive Physiological Reactions to Rejection The Effect of Self-Esteem and Attentional Control on Startle Responses

    Anett Gyurak;Özlem Ayduk

  • Individual differences in the rejection-aggression link in the hot

    Ozlem Ayduk;Anett Gyurak;Anna Luerssen

Frequent Co-Authors

Amit Etkin
Amit Etkin Stanford University
Leanne M. Williams
Leanne M. Williams Stanford University
Ozlem Ayduk
Ozlem Ayduk University of California, Berkeley
Robert W. Levenson
Robert W. Levenson University of California, Berkeley
Christine I. Hooker
Christine I. Hooker Harvard University
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Stéphane Côté
Stéphane Côté University of Toronto
Brendan P. Bradley
Brendan P. Bradley University of Southampton
Abigail Powers
Abigail Powers Emory University
James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the diverse field of psychology, there are many flexible online degree programs available across the United States. Choosing the right program can depend on factors such as specialization, location, and career goals.

Those seeking to build their expertise in a vibrant urban setting may consider the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Orlando, which are recognized for innovative research and internship opportunities. Alternatively, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno offer strong online learning options and connections to local mental health organizations.

The popular psychology programs in Seattle deliver a blend of academic excellence and tech-industry partnerships, ideal for students interested in data-driven psychology or research careers. Additionally, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in University, MS highlight affordable options and flexible online pathways for working professionals.

With online degrees becoming increasingly respected by employers, graduates can pursue career pathways in counseling, research, human resources, education, and more—making the field of psychology both accessible and rewarding.

Best Scientists Citing Anett Gyurak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles