World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Laura V. Scaramella

Laura V. Scaramella

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9145 8547 4849 4416 56 6515

Laura V. Scaramella publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura V. Scaramella between 1997 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura V. Scaramella published across 25 years, from 1997 to 2021, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2010. 2 of the 58 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2010. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1997 2021

58 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura V. Scaramella: publications per year, 1997 to 2021
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 7
2011 4
2012 4
2013 6
2014 2
2015 5
2016 4
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
Total 58
Download as CSV

Laura V. Scaramella publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura V. Scaramella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138 56
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura V. Scaramella D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura V. Scaramella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Laura V. Scaramella is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Psychology, with a particular emphasis on Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health subfields.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Their recent publications reflect these research interests. Notable papers include:

  • "Cumulative socio-contextual risk and child abuse potential in parents of young children: Can social support buffer the impact?" (2020), published in Child & Family Social Work
  • "Special section on personality development: Testing environmental and genetic associations across generations." (2021), published in Developmental Psychology

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations are:

  • Lucy McGoron
  • Moira R. Riley
  • Katherine J. Conger
  • Tricia K. Neppl

The venues where Laura V. Scaramella most often publishes include:

  • Child & Family Social Work
  • Developmental Psychology

Best Publications

  • Implications of timing of maternal depressive symptoms for early cognitive and language development.

    Sara L. Sohr-Preston;Laura V. Scaramella

  • Clarifying parent-child reciprocities during early childhood: The early childhood coercion model.

    Laura V. Scaramella;Leslie D. Leve

  • Angry and aggressive behavior across three generations: a prospective, longitudinal study of parents and children.

    Rand D. Conger;Tricia Neppl;Kee Jeong Kim;Laura Scaramella

  • Parents, Siblings, Psychological Control, and Adolescent Adjustment

    Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Rand D. Conger;Laura V. Scaramella

  • Parental Protective Influences and Gender-Specific Increases in Adolescent Internalizing and Externalizing Problems

    Laura V. Scaramella;Rand D. Conger;Ronald L. Simons

  • Consequences of socioeconomic disadvantage across three generations: parenting behavior and child externalizing problems.

    Laura V. Scaramella;Tricia K. Neppl;Lenna L. Ontai;Rand D. Conger

  • Intergenerational continuity in parenting behavior: mediating pathways and child effects.

    Tricia K. Neppl;Rand D. Conger;Laura V. Scaramella;Lenna L. Ontai

  • Predicting risk for pregnancy by late adolescence: a social contextual perspective.

    Laura V. Scaramella;Rand D. Conger;Ronald L. Simons;Les B. Whitbeck

  • First Onset of Depressive or Anxiety Disorders Predicted by the Longitudinal Course of Internalizing Symptoms and Parent-Adolescent Disagreements

    Martha A. Rueter;Laura Scaramella;Lora Ebert Wallace;Rand D. Conger

  • Evaluation of a social contextual model of delinquency: a cross-study replication.

    Laura V. Scaramella;Rand D. Conger;Richard Spoth;Ronald L. Simons

  • Bridging the divide: openness in adoption and postadoption psychosocial adjustment among birth and adoptive parents.

    Xiaojia Ge;Misaki N. Natsuaki;David M. Martin;Leslie D. Leve

  • A Test of the Family Stress Model on Toddler-Aged Children's Adjustment Among Hurricane Katrina Impacted and Nonimpacted Low-Income Families

    Laura V. Scaramella;Sara L. Sohr-Preston;Kristin L. Callahan;Scott P. Mirabile

  • Parental Socioeconomic Status, Communication, and Children's Vocabulary Development: A Third‐Generation Test of the Family Investment Model

    Sara L. Sohr-Preston;Laura V. Scaramella;Monica J. Martin;Tricia K. Neppl

  • Intergenerational Relationship Quality, Gender and Grandparent Involvement.

    Melissa A. Barnett;Laura V. Scaramella;Tricia K. Neppl;Lenna L. Ontai

  • Grandmother involvement as a protective factor for early childhood social adjustment.

    Melissa A. Barnett;Laura V. Scaramella;Tricia K. Neppl;Lenna L. Ontai

  • Intergenerational Continuity of Hostile Parenting and Its Consequences: The Moderating Influence of Children's Negative Emotional Reactivity.

    Laura V. Scaramella;Rand D. Conger

  • Infant Pathways to Externalizing Behavior: Evidence of Genotype × Environment Interaction

    Leslie D. Leve;David C. R. Kerr;Daniel Shaw;Xiaojia Ge

  • Beyond the Interactional Relationship between Delinquency and Parenting Practices: The Contribution of Legal Sanctions

    Eric A. Stewart;Ronald L. Simons;Rand D. Conger;Laura V. Scaramella

  • The early growth and development study: A prospective adoption design

    Leslie D. Leve;Jenae M. Neiderhiser;Xiaojia Ge;Laura V. Scaramella

  • Differential stability of temperament and personality from toddlerhood to middle childhood

    Tricia K. Neppl;M. Brent Donnellan;Laura V. Scaramella;Keith F. Widaman

Frequent Co-Authors

Rand D. Conger
Rand D. Conger University of California, Davis
Leslie D. Leve
Leslie D. Leve University of Oregon
Jenae M. Neiderhiser
Jenae M. Neiderhiser Pennsylvania State University
David Reiss
David Reiss Yale University
Daniel S. Shaw
Daniel S. Shaw University of Pittsburgh
Xiaojia Ge
Xiaojia Ge University of Minnesota
Misaki N. Natsuaki
Misaki N. Natsuaki University of California, Riverside
John B. Reid
John B. Reid University of Oregon
Jody M. Ganiban
Jody M. Ganiban George Washington University
Ronald L. Simons
Ronald L. Simons University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in psychology open the door to a variety of rewarding career options—one growing field is applied behavior analysis, leading to roles like Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Many students are interested in becoming a bcba in Raleigh or similar cities, as the demand for qualified professionals continues to rise nationwide.

The path to BCBA certification requires a specific blend of education, supervised experience, and passing a national exam. Prospective students should explore region-specific details, such as bcba certification requirements in Reno or bcba certification requirements in Richmond. These local guides highlight the importance of understanding state regulations and practical training opportunities that can impact your career.

Most programs emphasize flexibility, allowing you to balance online coursework with hands-on experience. Whether your goal is to meet Riverside bcba education requirements or pursue licensure elsewhere, online degrees in psychology can help you step into roles in schools, clinics, and community centers. Exploring these options helps ensure your education aligns with both your career aspirations and local certification standards.

Best Scientists Citing Laura V. Scaramella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles