World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
53401
World Ranking
5278
National Ranking
169

Marco Colleoni publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Colleoni sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 630 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Marco Colleoni D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Colleoni sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Colleoni is affiliated with the European Institute of Oncology in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on oncology, with significant contributions in advanced breast cancer therapies and treatment studies. Their work intersects several scientific fields, including medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Subfields within their expertise include oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cancer research, genetics, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's publication record reveals a strong presence in leading cancer research journals. They frequently publish in venues such as Cancer Research, Annals of Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research, and The Breast.

Marco Colleoni has co-authored numerous papers with recurring collaborators, including Giuseppe Viale, Meredith M. Regan, Richard D. Gelber, Lucia Del Mastro, and Martine Piccart.

Key research topics covered by Marco Colleoni include:

  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects

Recent publications by Marco Colleoni include:

  • Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer, 2022, Annals of Oncology
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes, 2023, JAMA Oncology
  • Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment with or without atezolizumab in triple-negative, early high-risk and locally advanced breast cancer: NeoTRIP Michelangelo randomized study, 2022, Annals of Oncology

Best Publications

  • Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013

    A Goldhirsch;E P Winer;A S Coates;R D Gelber

  • Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Massimo Cristofanilli;Nicholas C. Turner;Igor Bondarenko;Jungsil Ro

  • Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23–01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Viviana Galimberti;Bernard F. Cole;Bernard F. Cole;Stefano Zurrida;Giuseppe Viale;Giuseppe Viale

  • De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017

    G. Curigliano;H. J. Burstein;E. P. Winer;M. Gnant

  • Five Years of Letrozole Compared With Tamoxifen As Initial Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Endocrine-Responsive Early Breast Cancer: Update of Study BIG 1-98

    Alan S. Coates;Aparna Keshaviah;Beat Thürlimann;Henning Mouridsen

  • Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer

    Nicholas C Turner;Dennis J Slamon;Jungsil Ro;Igor Bondarenko

  • Meta-Analysis of Breast Cancer Outcomes in Adjuvant Trials of Aromatase Inhibitors Versus Tamoxifen

    Mitch Dowsett;Jack Cuzick;Jim Ingle;Alan Coates

  • Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial

    Debu Tripathy;Seock Ah Im;Marco Colleoni;Fabio Franke

  • Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer

    Seock-Ah Im;Yen-Shen Lu;Aditya Bardia;Nadia Harbeck

  • Adjuvant Exemestane with Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer

    Olivia Pagani;Meredith M. Regan;Barbara A. Walley;Gini F. Fleming

  • Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer

    Prudence A. Francis;Prudence A. Francis;Meredith M. Regan;Gini F. Fleming;István Láng

  • Tailoring Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Breast Cancer.

    P. A. Francis;P. A. Francis;O. Pagani;G. F. Fleming;B. A. Walley

  • Low-dose oral methotrexate and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer: antitumor activity and correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor levels

    M. Colleoni;A. Rocca;M. T. Sandri;L. Zorzino

  • Estimating the Benefits of Therapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer The St Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2019

    H.J. Burstein;G. Curigliano;S. Loibl;P. Dubsky

  • Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021.

    H J Burstein;G Curigliano;B Thürlimann;W P Weber

  • Annual Hazard Rates of Recurrence for Breast Cancer During 24 Years of Follow-Up: Results From the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V

    Marco Colleoni;Zhuoxin Sun;Karen N. Price;Per Karlsson

  • Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation

    M. Colleoni;N. Rotmensz;C. Robertson;L. Orlando

  • Rapid Chemotherapy-Induced Acute Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization: Implications for Antiangiogenic Drugs as Chemosensitizing Agents

    Yuval Shaked;Erik Henke;Jeanine M.L. Roodhart;Patrizia Mancuso

  • International Guidelines for Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Can Metastatic Breast Cancer Be Cured?

    Olivia Pagani;Elżbieta Senkus;William Wood;Marco Colleoni

  • Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

    D. Miles;J. Gligorov;F. André;D. Cameron

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Viale
Giuseppe Viale University of Milan
Aron Goldhirsch
Aron Goldhirsch European Institute of Oncology
Paolo Veronesi
Paolo Veronesi European Institute of Oncology
Richard D. Gelber
Richard D. Gelber Harvard University
Alan S. Coates
Alan S. Coates University of Sydney
Vincenzo Bagnardi
Vincenzo Bagnardi University of Milano-Bicocca
Meredith M. Regan
Meredith M. Regan Harvard University
Karen N. Price
Karen N. Price Frontier Science Foundation
Nicole Rotmensz
Nicole Rotmensz European Institute of Oncology
Giancarlo Pruneri
Giancarlo Pruneri University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens up a wide range of online health-related degree options, providing flexibility and accessibility for aspiring professionals. One popular path is through affordable online nursing programs, which help students gain valuable clinical skills while managing costs compared to traditional on-campus degrees.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their education, exploring the average cost of rn to bsn programs is essential. These programs allow RNs to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing online, often at a lower price point.

Non-nursing professionals interested in making a career switch may benefit from direct entry online msn programs. These accelerated pathways are tailored for those without prior nursing backgrounds, helping candidates enter the nursing field quickly.

For those aiming for leadership or academic roles, phd nursing programs offer advanced online study with a focus on research, teaching, or executive practice, usually at a more affordable rate than traditional PhD routes.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Colleoni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles