World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 147 1262 28 848 99625

Aron Goldhirsch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aron Goldhirsch between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aron Goldhirsch published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 19.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2007. 8 of the 888 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2007. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 14 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 18 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 25 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 39 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 44 publications 2007: 48 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 46 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 44 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
1980 2025

888 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aron Goldhirsch: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 4
1982 7
1983 14
1984 9
1985 11
1986 8
1987 6
1988 8
1989 12
1990 13
1991 10
1992 18
1993 13
1994 12
1995 9
1996 16
1997 17
1998 25
1999 14
2000 20
2001 20
2002 17
2003 26
2004 39
2005 31
2006 44
2007 48
2008 37
2009 46
2010 32
2011 35
2012 44
2013 33
2014 30
2015 29
2016 21
2017 14
2018 18
2019 15
2020 7
2021 7
2022 5
2023 34
2024 3
2025 5
Total 888
Download as CSV

Aron Goldhirsch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aron Goldhirsch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 841–860 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 848 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177 848
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Aron Goldhirsch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aron Goldhirsch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 146–147 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 147 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106 147
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Aron Goldhirsch was affiliated with the European Institute of Oncology in Italy. Their research primarily focused on medicine with a significant emphasis on oncology and cancer research. Their work contributed to multiple subfields including oncology, cancer research, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The scientist's main topics of investigation included:

  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Among their recent published papers were:

  • "Interrupting Endocrine Therapy to Attempt Pregnancy after Breast Cancer," 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Adjuvant Exemestane With Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Combined TEXT and SOFT Trials," 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Sex-Based Dimorphism of Anticancer Immune Response and Molecular Mechanisms of Immune Evasion," 2021, Clinical Cancer Research
  • "Moderate penetrance genes complicate genetic testing for breast cancer diagnosis: ATM, CHEK2, BARD1 and RAD51D," 2022, The Breast
  • "Who are the women who enrolled in the POSITIVE trial: A global study to support young hormone receptor positive breast cancer survivors desiring pregnancy," 2021, The Breast

Goldhirsch published frequently in specific scientific venues including:

  • The Breast
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research

Collaborations were a notable part of their academic output. Frequent co-authors included:

  • Marco Colleoni
  • Richard D. Gelber
  • Olivia Pagani
  • Meredith M. Regan
  • Alan S. Coates

This body of work indicates a sustained engagement with breast cancer studies, focusing on treatment strategies, genetic factors influencing cancer diagnosis, hormone-related effects, and survivorship care.

Best Publications

  • Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

    Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart;Marion Procter;Brian Leyland-Jones;Aron Goldhirsch

  • Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011

    A. Goldhirsch;W.C. Wood;A.S. Coates;R.D. Gelber

  • Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013

    A Goldhirsch;E P Winer;A S Coates;R D Gelber

  • A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

    Beat Thürlimann;Aparna Keshaviah;Alan S Coates

  • Tailoring therapies—improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015

    A. S. Coates;E. P. Winer;A. Goldhirsch;R. D. Gelber

  • 2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial

    Ian Smith;Marion Procter;Richard D Gelber;Sébastien Guillaume

  • Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009

    Aron Goldhirsch;J. N. Ingle;R. D. Gelber;A. S. Coates

  • Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

    José Baselga;José Baselga;Ian Bradbury;Holger Eidtmann;Serena Di Cosimo;Serena Di Cosimo

  • Meeting Highlights: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005

    A. Goldhirsch;J. H. Glick;R. D. Gelber;A. S. Coates

  • Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23–01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Viviana Galimberti;Bernard F. Cole;Bernard F. Cole;Stefano Zurrida;Giuseppe Viale;Giuseppe Viale

  • Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007

    A. Goldhirsch;W. C. Wood;R. D. Gelber;A. S. Coates

  • Five Years of Letrozole Compared With Tamoxifen As Initial Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Endocrine-Responsive Early Breast Cancer: Update of Study BIG 1-98

    Alan S. Coates;Aparna Keshaviah;Beat Thürlimann;Henning Mouridsen

  • Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

    B A Gusterson;R D Gelber;A Goldhirsch;K N Price

  • Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer

    Aron Goldhirsch;John H. Glick;Richard D. Gelber;Hans-Jörg Senn

  • 11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial

    David Cameron;Martine J Piccart-Gebhart;Richard D Gelber;Richard D Gelber;Marion Procter

  • Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer

    Aron Goldhirsch;William C. Wood;Richard D. Gelber;Alan S. Coates

  • Cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapy, targeted agents and radiotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines

    G. Curigliano;D. Cardinale;T. Suter;G. Plataniotis

  • Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer

    Aron Goldhirsch;John H. Glick;Richard D. Gelber;Alan S. Coates

  • Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials

    Bernard Asselain;William Barlow;John Bartlett;Jonas Bergh

  • Recommendations From an International Expert Panel on the Use of Neoadjuvant (Primary) Systemic Treatment of Operable Breast Cancer: An Update

    Manfred Kaufmann;Gabriel N. Hortobagyi;Aron Goldhirsch;Suzy Scholl

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard D. Gelber
Richard D. Gelber Harvard University
Giuseppe Viale
Giuseppe Viale University of Milan
Marco Colleoni
Marco Colleoni European Institute of Oncology
Alan S. Coates
Alan S. Coates University of Sydney
Karen N. Price
Karen N. Price Frontier Science Foundation
Vincenzo Bagnardi
Vincenzo Bagnardi University of Milano-Bicocca
Paolo Veronesi
Paolo Veronesi European Institute of Oncology
Meredith M. Regan
Meredith M. Regan Harvard University
Giuseppe Curigliano
Giuseppe Curigliano University of Milan
Nicole Rotmensz
Nicole Rotmensz European Institute of Oncology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers outside of the traditional medicine route, there are several flexible online pathways to consider. Programs such as direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online offer a fast-track for individuals with a non-nursing background to enter advanced nursing fields. These programs are designed for career changers and typically emphasize a streamlined curriculum.

If you’re seeking nursing schools with more accessible admission criteria, a number of easy nursing programs to get into can help you start your journey in the healthcare sector. Many schools also offer LPN programs with no entrance exam requirements; you can learn more about these options at lpn program no entrance exam.

If you’re looking for administrative roles in healthcare, consider training at medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid. These programs prepare you for essential support roles in medical offices and hospitals, with flexible online learning and financial support options.

Best Scientists Citing Aron Goldhirsch

Recently Published Articles