World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
11850
World Ranking
12045
National Ranking
314

Marc C.J. Verdegem publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc C.J. Verdegem sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 241 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Marc C.J. Verdegem D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc C.J. Verdegem sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Aquaculture

His primary areas of study are Aquaculture, Periphyton, Animal science, Botany and Ecology. He interconnects Environmental engineering, Water use, Fishery, Plankton and Sustainability in the investigation of issues within Aquaculture. He has included themes like Dry matter, Bamboo and Substrate in his Periphyton study.

His work carried out in the field of Animal science brings together such families of science as Polyculture and Labeo. His research in Botany intersects with topics in Shrimp, Penaeus monodon, Water column, Fish farming and Nutrient. He usually deals with Ecology and limits it to topics linked to Stocking and Soleá.

His most cited work include:

  • New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: A perspective on environmental sustainability (445 citations)
  • The potential of fish production based on periphyton (150 citations)
  • Scenarios for Resilient Shrimp Aquaculture in Tropical Coastal Areas (144 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Aquaculture, Fishery, Animal science, Periphyton and Ecology are his primary areas of study. His studies deal with areas such as Productivity, Agronomy, Agriculture and Nutrient as well as Aquaculture. His Fishery research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Fish farming, Shrimp farming and Polyculture.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Tilapia, Botany and Zooplankton in addition to Animal science. His work deals with themes such as Gut flora and Nile tilapia, Oreochromis, which intersect with Tilapia. The various areas that Marc C.J. Verdegem examines in his Periphyton study include Macrobrachium rosenbergii, Prawn, Dry matter, Water quality and Plankton.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Aquaculture (39.61%)
  • Fishery (31.88%)
  • Animal science (28.50%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Aquaculture (39.61%)
  • Nile tilapia (13.53%)
  • Food science (9.18%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Marc C.J. Verdegem mostly deals with Aquaculture, Nile tilapia, Food science, Animal science and Nutrient. His Aquaculture study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Ecology, Polychaete and Fishery. His studies in Fishery integrate themes in fields like Amazon rainforest and Nutrient density.

His Nile tilapia research incorporates themes from Fish farming, Dietary protein and Tilapia. His Animal science research integrates issues from Carbohydrate, Polysaccharide, Biomass, Feed conversion ratio and Ingredient. His Nutrient research includes elements of Benthic zone, Ecosystem, Bile acid and Mussel.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Managing the Microbial Community of Marine Fish Larvae: A Holistic Perspective for Larviculture. (24 citations)
  • The effect of phytase, xylanase and their combination on growth performance and nutrient utilization in Nile tilapia (23 citations)
  • Effect of dietary protein to energy ratio on performance of nile tilapia and food web enhancement in semi-intensive pond aquaculture (16 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Ecosystem

Marc C.J. Verdegem mainly investigates Nile tilapia, Aquaculture, Food science, Animal science and Tilapia. His Nile tilapia research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Fishery and Amazon rainforest. His Aquaculture study combines topics in areas such as Ecology, Larva, Resistance, Species richness and Nutrient.

His work on Eutrophication, Agriculture and Metamorphosis as part of general Ecology research is frequently linked to Microbial population biology, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Food science study incorporates themes from Commercial fish feed and Polysaccharide. His Animal science research incorporates elements of Biomass and Food web.

Best Publications

  • New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: A perspective on environmental sustainability

    C.I.M. Martins;C.I.M. Martins;E.H. Eding;M.C.J. Verdegem;L.T.N. Heinsbroek

  • Effects of carbohydrate addition on production in extensive shrimp culture systems

    B. Hari;B. Madhusoodana Kurup;Johny T. Varghese;J.W. Schrama

  • C/N ratio control and substrate addition for periphyton development jointly enhance freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii production in ponds

    M. Asaduzzaman;M.A. Wahab;M.C.J. Verdegem;S. Huque

  • The potential of fish production based on periphyton

    A. A. van Dam;M. C. M. Beveridge;M. E. Azim;M. C. J. Verdegem

  • The effect of carbohydrate addition on water quality and the nitrogen budget in extensive shrimp culture systems

    B. Hari;B. Madhusoodana Kurup;Johny T. Varghese;J.W. Schrama

  • The impact of rearing environment on the development of gut microbiota in tilapia larvae

    Christos Giatsis;Detmer Sipkema;Hauke Smidt;Hans Heilig

  • Sustainable aquaculture in ponds: Principles, practices and limits

    Roel H. Bosma;Marc C.J. Verdegem

  • Reducing Water Use for Animal Production through Aquaculture

    M.C.J. Verdegem;R.H. Bosma;J.A.J. Verreth

  • Microorganisms in recirculating aquaculture systems and their management

    Eugene Rurangwa;Marc C.J. Verdegem

  • Responsible Aquaculture in 2050: Valuing Local Conditions and Human Innovations will be Key to Success

    James S. Diana;Hillary S. Egna;Thierry Chopin;Mark S. Peterson

  • Periphyton: Ecology, Exploitation and Management

    M.E. Azim;M.C.J. Verdegem;A.A. van Dam;M.C.M. Beveridge

  • Stocking density-dependent growth of Dover sole (Solea solea)

    E. Schram;J.W. Van der Heul;A. Kamstra;M.C.J. Verdegem

  • Misuse of multiple comparison tests and underuse of contrast procedures in aquaculture publications

    Rodrigue Yossa;Marc Verdegem

  • Water withdrawal for brackish and inland aquaculture, and options to produce more fish in ponds with present water use

    M. C. J. Verdegem;R. H. Bosma

  • Scenarios for Resilient Shrimp Aquaculture in Tropical Coastal Areas

    S.R. Bush;P.A.M. van Zwieten;L.E. Visser;H. van Dijk

  • Nutrient discharge from aquaculture operations in function of system design and production environment

    Marc C. J. Verdegem

  • Use of artificial substrates to enhance production of freshwater herbivorous fish in pond culture

    P Keshavanath;B Gangadhar;T J Ramesh;J M Van Rooij

  • Growth, production and food preference of rohu Labeo rohita (H.) in monoculture and in polyculture with common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.) under fed and non-fed ponds

    M.M. Rahman;M.C.J. Verdegem;L.A.J. Nagelkerke;M.A. Wahab

  • Evaluation of polyculture of Indian major carps in periphyton-based ponds

    M.E Azim;M.C.J Verdegem;M.M Rahman;M.A Wahab

  • The potential of periphyton-based culture of two indian major carps, rohu Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and gonia Labeo gonius (Linnaeus).

    M E Azim;M A Wahab;A A Van Dam;M C M Beveridge

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan A.J. Verreth
Johan A.J. Verreth Wageningen University & Research
Johan W. Schrama
Johan W. Schrama Wageningen University & Research
Hauke Smidt
Hauke Smidt Wageningen University & Research
Jetse J. Stoorvogel
Jetse J. Stoorvogel Wageningen University & Research
Just M. Vlak
Just M. Vlak Wageningen University & Research
Max Troell
Max Troell Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Simon R. Bush
Simon R. Bush Wageningen University & Research
Yoram Avnimelech
Yoram Avnimelech Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Marc Metian
Marc Metian International Atomic Energy Agency
Jan H.W.M. Rombout
Jan H.W.M. Rombout Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and industry. Many related pathways now offer flexible online study options, making it easier to further your education while balancing work or personal commitments.

For those seeking advanced nursing roles, exploring the shortest online nurse practitioner program can fast-track your journey to becoming a family nurse practitioner. If you have a passion for nutrition, a dietician degree online offers flexible coursework to help you qualify for specialist roles in health, wellness, or clinical settings.

Registered nurses looking to advance their credentials can benefit from rn to bsn programs, which streamline the path to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. For those interested in leadership or administrative roles, the fastest online master's in healthcare administration equips you with essential management skills to oversee healthcare facilities or departments.

Exploring these online degrees can help you identify the best fit for your career goals and open up new opportunities in the health and life sciences sector.

Best Scientists Citing Marc C.J. Verdegem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles