World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
38
Citations
5018
World Ranking
4437
National Ranking
1097

Joseph G. Lauer publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. Lauer sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 96 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Joseph G. Lauer D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. Lauer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agronomy
  • Botany
  • Fertilizer

Joseph G. Lauer spends much of his time researching Agronomy, Yield, Sowing, Poaceae and Hybrid. His Crop, Cultivar, Forage, Fodder and Dry matter study are his primary interests in Agronomy. He has researched Yield in several fields, including Tillage and Conventional tillage.

His Sowing study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Growing season and Field conditions. His Poaceae research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Dairy cattle and Starch. His work carried out in the field of Hybrid brings together such families of science as Ostrinia and Grain yield.

His most cited work include:

  • Relationship Between Corn Vitreousness and Ruminal In Situ Starch Degradability (178 citations)
  • Corn and soybean response to rotation sequence, row spacing, and tillage system (119 citations)
  • Corn Hybrid Response to Planting Date in the Northern Corn Belt (114 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Agronomy, Yield, Dry matter, Forage and Sowing. His study involves Poaceae, Crop, Silage, CORN GRAIN and Tillage, a branch of Agronomy. His work in Poaceae addresses issues such as Hybrid, which are connected to fields such as Ostrinia.

In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Yield, Avena and Growing season is strongly linked to Crop rotation. His research integrates issues of Digestion and Germplasm in his study of Dry matter. Joseph G. Lauer interconnects Loam, Cultivar, Crop yield and Grain yield in the investigation of issues within Sowing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (76.67%)
  • Yield (18.89%)
  • Dry matter (16.67%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Agronomy (76.67%)
  • Yield (18.89%)
  • Yield (8.89%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Agronomy, Yield, Yield, Crop and Silage. His Agronomy study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Biomass. Joseph G. Lauer has included themes like Soil properties, Fungicide and Tillage, Conventional tillage in his Yield study.

His research in Tillage intersects with topics in Soil texture, Soil carbon, Plough and Animal science. His Crop research incorporates themes from Dry matter, Starch, Zea mays, Medicago sativa and Seedling. The concepts of his Silage study are interwoven with issues in Manure management, Cover crop, Living mulch and Red Clover.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Commercialized transgenic traits, maize productivity and yield risk (71 citations)
  • Can crop simulation models be used to predict local to regional maize yields and total production in the U.S. Corn Belt (41 citations)
  • What does it take to detect a change in soil carbon stock? A regional comparison of minimum detectable difference and experiment duration in the north central United States (28 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agronomy
  • Botany
  • Horticulture

His primary areas of study are Agronomy, Crop yield, Cropping, Tillage and Yield. His Agronomy research includes elements of Biotechnology and Fusarium. The various areas that Joseph G. Lauer examines in his Crop yield study include Conventional tillage, Crop and Sowing.

Much of his study explores Cropping relationship to Agricultural science. His Tillage research includes themes of Soil properties, Yield and Animal science.

Best Publications

  • Relationship Between Corn Vitreousness and Ruminal In Situ Starch Degradability

    C.E.S. Correa;R.D. Shaver;M.N. Pereira;J.G. Lauer

  • Corn and soybean response to rotation sequence, row spacing, and tillage system

    Palle Pedersen;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Corn Grain Yield Response to Crop Rotation and Nitrogen over 35 Years

    Trenton F. Stanger;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Response of Soybean Yield Components to Management System and Planting Date

    Palle Pedersen;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Corn Hybrid Response to Planting Date in the Northern Corn Belt

    Joseph G. Lauer;Paul R. Carter;Timothy M. Wood;G. Diezel

  • Environment Affects the Corn and Soybean Rotation Effect

    Paul M. Porter;Joseph G. Lauer;William E. Lueschen;J. Harlan Ford

  • Harvest Date and Hybrid Influence on Corn Forage Yield, Quality, and Preservation

    Heather M. Darby;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Forage Yield and Quality

    Jorge A. Cusicanqui;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Corn Production with Kura Clover as a Living Mulch

    Robert A. Zemenchik;Kenneth A. Albrecht;Chris M. Boerboom;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Processing and chop length effects in brown-midrib corn silage on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows.

    E.C. Schwab;R.D. Shaver;K.J. Shinners;J.G. Lauer

  • Stage of maturity, processing, and hybrid effects on ruminal in situ disappearance of whole-plant corn silage

    M.A Bal;R.D Shaver;K.J Shinners;J.G Coors

  • Commercialized transgenic traits, maize productivity and yield risk

    Guanming Shi;Jean-Paul Chavas;Joseph Lauer

  • Optimum Plant Population of Bt and Non-Bt Corn in Wisconsin

    Trenton F. Stanger;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Soybean Growth and Development in Various Management Systems and Planting Dates

    Palle Pedersen;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Forage yield and quality of Corn cultivars developed in different eras

    J. G. Lauer;J. G. Coors;P. J. Flannery

  • Intercropping Corn with Lablab Bean, Velvet Bean, and Scarlet Runner Bean for Forage

    Kevin L. Armstrong;Kenneth A. Albrecht;Joseph G. Lauer;Heathcliffe Riday;Heathcliffe Riday

  • Influence of Rotation Sequence on the Optimum Corn and Soybean Plant Population

    Palle Pedersen;Joseph G. Lauer

  • Can crop simulation models be used to predict local to regional maize yields and total production in the U.S. Corn Belt

    Francisco J. Morell;Haishun S. Yang;Kenneth G. Cassman;Justin Van Wart

  • Corn Silage Hybrid Effects on Intake, Digestion, and Milk Production by Dairy Cows

    M.A. Bal;R.D. Shaver;H. Al-Jobeile;J.G. Coors

  • Estimating silage energy value and milk yield to rank corn hybrids

    Eric C. Schwab;Randy D. Shaver;Joseph G. Lauer;James G. Coors

  • Effects of Genotype × Environment Interaction on Agronomic Traits in Soybean

    Zhe Yan;Joseph G. Lauer;Roger Borges;Natalia de Leon

  • The Profitability and Risk of Long-Term Cropping Systems Featuring Different Rotations and Nitrogen Rates

    Trenton F. Stanger;Joseph G. Lauer;Jean-Paul Chavas

Frequent Co-Authors

Randy D. Shaver
Randy D. Shaver University of Wisconsin–Madison
Shawn P. Conley
Shawn P. Conley University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jean-Paul Chavas
Jean-Paul Chavas University of Wisconsin–Madison
Emerson D. Nafziger
Emerson D. Nafziger University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Matthew J. Helmers
Matthew J. Helmers Iowa State University
María B. Villamil
María B. Villamil University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jeffrey A. Coulter
Jeffrey A. Coulter University of Minnesota
Paul M. Porter
Paul M. Porter University of Minnesota
Jean-Michel Ané
Jean-Michel Ané University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kevin J. Shinners
Kevin J. Shinners University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Joseph G. Lauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles