World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
43473
World Ranking
9142
National Ranking
4716

Lynne M. Mofenson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne M. Mofenson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 450 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lynne M. Mofenson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne M. Mofenson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lynne M. Mofenson is affiliated with the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation in the United States. Their research is focused primarily within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to the subfields of Infectious Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Emergency Medicine.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to HIV/AIDS research and interventions, including drug development and treatment. Additional focal areas include HIV-related health complications, pregnancy and medication impact, the impact of COVID-19 on reproduction, and studies on pregnancy and preeclampsia.

Frequent co-authors with whom Lynne M. Mofenson has collaborated include:

  • Jean B. Nachega
  • Lynda Stranix-Chibanda
  • Elaine J. Abrams
  • Martina Penazzato
  • Nadia A. Sam-Agudu

Key venues where the scientist's research has been published multiple times include:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of the International AIDS Society
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • The Lancet HIV

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Lynne M. Mofenson are:

  • Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, BMJ
  • SARS-CoV-2 positivity in offspring and timing of mother-to-child transmission: living systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, BMJ
  • Comparative efficacy, tolerability and safety of dolutegravir and efavirenz 400mg among antiretroviral therapies for first-line HIV treatment: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis, 2020, EClinicalMedicine
  • Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 in Africa: Early Insights from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2020, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • Emerging evidence from a systematic review of safety of pre-exposure prophylaxis for pregnant and postpartum women: where are we now and where are we heading?, 2020, Journal of the International AIDS Society

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults and adolescents

    A. S. Fauci;J. G. Bartlett;E. P. Goosby;M. D. Smith

  • Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial

    Laura A Guay;Philippa Musoke;Thomas Fleming;Danstan Bagenda

  • Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis.

    John Allotey;Elena Stallings;Mercedes Bonet;Magnus Yap

  • Combination antiretroviral strategies for the treatment of pregnant HIV-1-infected women and prevention of perinatal HIV-1 transmission.

    Ellen R. Cooper;Manhattan Charurat;Lynne Mofenson;I. Celine Hanson

  • Viral Load and Disease Progression in Infants Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

    William T. Shearer;Thomas C. Quinn;Philip LaRussa;Judy F. Lew

  • U.S. Public Health Service Task Force recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs in pregnant HIV-1-infected women for maternal health and interventions to reduce perinatal HIV-1 transmission in the United States.

    Lynne M. Mofenson

  • RISK FACTORS FOR PERINATAL TRANSMISSION OF HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS TYPE 1 IN WOMEN TREATED WITH ZIDOVUDINE

    Lynne M. Mofenson;John S. Lambert;E. Richard Stiehm;James Bethel

  • Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: 18-month follow-up of the HIVNET 012 randomised trial

    J. Brooks Jackson;Philippa Musoke;Thomas Fleming;Thomas Fleming;Laura A. Guay

  • Measles Antibody: Reevaluation of Protective Titers

    Robert T. Chen;Lauri E. Markowitz;Paul Albrecht;John A. Stewart

  • Guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections among HIV-infected persons - 2002

    Henry Masur;Jonathan E. Kaplan;King K. Holmes;Beverly Alston

  • Obstetrical Factors and the Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 from Mother to Child

    Sheldon H. Landesman;Leslie A. Kalish;David N. Burns;Howard Minkoff

  • Adherence to antiretroviral therapy during and after pregnancy in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jean B. Nachega;Olalekan A. Uthman;Olalekan A. Uthman;Jean Anderson;Karl Peltzer;Karl Peltzer

  • Perinatal Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 by Pregnant Women with RNA Virus Loads <1000 Copies/mL

    John P. A. Ioannidis;John P. A. Ioannidis;Elaine J. Abrams;Elaine J. Abrams;Arthur Ammann;Marc Bulterys

  • Selection and fading of resistance mutations in women and infants receiving nevirapine to prevent HIV-1 vertical transmission (HIVNET 012).

    Susan H. Eshleman;Martin Mracna;Laura A. Guay;Martina Deseyve

  • Antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy and the risk of an adverse outcome

    Ruth E. Tuomala;David E. Shapiro;Lynne M. Mofenson;Yvonne Bryson

  • Two-dose intrapartum/newborn nevirapine and standard antiretroviral therapy to reduce perinatal HIV transmission: a randomized trial.

    Alejandro Dorenbaum;Coleen K. Cunningham;Richard D. Gelber;Mary Culnane

  • Extended antiretroviral prophylaxis to reduce breast-milk HIV-1 transmission

    Newton I. Kumwenda;Donald R. Hoover;Lynne M. Mofenson;Michael C. Thigpen

  • Lack of Long-term Effects of In Utero Exposure to Zidovudine Among Uninfected Children Born to HIV-Infected Women

    Mary Culnane;Mary Glenn Fowler;Sophia S. Lee;George McSherry

  • Benefits and Risks of Antiretroviral Therapy for Perinatal HIV Prevention

    Mary G. Fowler;Min Qin;Susan A. Fiscus;Judith S. Currier

  • Evaluation of Tuberculosis Diagnostics in Children: 1. Proposed Clinical Case Definitions for Classification of Intrathoracic Tuberculosis Disease. Consensus From an Expert Panel

    Stephen M. Graham;Stephen M. Graham;Tahmeed Ahmed;Farhana Amanullah;Renee Browning

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Glenn Fowler
Mary Glenn Fowler Johns Hopkins University
Jean B. Nachega
Jean B. Nachega University of Pittsburgh
Yvonne J. Bryson
Yvonne J. Bryson University of California, Los Angeles
Taha E. Taha
Taha E. Taha Johns Hopkins University
Ram Yogev
Ram Yogev Northwestern University
Susan H. Eshleman
Susan H. Eshleman Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Kenneth McIntosh
Kenneth McIntosh Boston Children's Hospital
Diane W. Wara
Diane W. Wara University of California, San Francisco
John L. Sullivan
John L. Sullivan University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Stephen A. Spector
Stephen A. Spector University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine is not limited to becoming a doctor. Today, various online degrees open pathways to in-demand healthcare roles while offering flexibility and affordability. For those interested in advanced nursing practice, finding the cheapest DNP program online can help reduce student debt and make a Doctor of Nursing Practice more accessible.

Pharmacy is another popular field, and earning a pharmacy degree online allows you to work towards a vital clinical and research-focused profession with a flexible schedule. High school students can get a head start in healthcare by exploring the best online schools for high school students specializing in health information management or related areas.

For those interested in administrative roles, a medical billing and coding certification online can quickly lead to opportunities in medical offices, insurance companies, and hospitals. Exploring these online degree and certification options is a smart way to enter or advance in the ever-growing healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Lynne M. Mofenson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles