World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
7736
World Ranking
9118
National Ranking
536

Amir Shmuel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Shmuel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Amir Shmuel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Shmuel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amir Shmuel is affiliated with the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital in Canada.

The primary fields of study engaged by Amir Shmuel include Medicine and Neuroscience. Within these fields, their work particularly spans the subfields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Molecular Biology.

The research topics covered in their publications focus on:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders

Frequent publication venues for Amir Shmuel's work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • NeuroImage
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Neuron

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Amir Shmuel are:

  • Aocai Yang
  • Bing Liu
  • Jixin Luan
  • Guolin Ma
  • Kuan Lv

Recent papers featuring Amir Shmuel include:

  • "Accelerating the Evolution of Nonhuman Primate Neuroimaging," 2020, Neuron
  • "Toward next-generation primate neuroscience: A collaboration-based strategic plan for integrative neuroimaging," 2021, Neuron
  • "Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and their underlying neural mechanisms evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging-based brain connectivity network analyses," 2023, European Journal of Radiology Open
  • "Evaluation of whole-brain oxygen metabolism in Alzheimer's disease using QSM and quantitative BOLD," 2023, NeuroImage
  • "Immune-related lncRNAs signature and radiomics signature predict the prognosis and immune microenvironment of glioblastoma multiforme," 2024, Journal of Translational Medicine

Best Publications

  • Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neuronal activity in monkey visual area V1.

    Amir Shmuel;Mark Augath;Axel Oeltermann;Nikos K Logothetis

  • Sustained Negative BOLD, Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Response and Its Coupling to the Positive Response in the Human Brain

    Amir Shmuel;Essa Yacoub;Josef Pfeuffer;Pierre Francois Van de Moortele

  • Neuronal correlates of spontaneous fluctuations in fMRI signals in monkey visual cortex: Implications for functional connectivity at rest

    Amir Shmuel;David A. Leopold

  • Imaging brain function in humans at 7 Tesla

    Essa Yacoub;Amir Shmuel;Josef Pfeuffer;Pierre Francois Van De Moortele

  • Robust detection of ocular dominance columns in humans using Hahn Spin Echo BOLD functional MRI at 7 Tesla.

    Essa Yacoub;Amir Shmuel;Amir Shmuel;Nikos K. Logothetis;Kamil Ugurbil;Kamil Ugurbil

  • Spatio-temporal point-spread function of fMRI signal in human gray matter at 7 Tesla.

    Amir Shmuel;Essa Yacoub;Denis Chaimow;Nikos K. Logothetis

  • Functional Organization for Direction of Motion and Its Relationship to Orientation Maps in Cat Area 18

    Amir Shmuel;Amiram Grinvald

  • An Open Resource for Non-human Primate Imaging

    Michael P. Milham;Michael P. Milham;Lei Ai;Bonhwang Koo;Ting Xu

  • Signal and noise characteristics of Hahn SE and GE BOLD fMRI at 7 T in humans

    Essa Yacoub;Pierre-Francois Van De Moortele;Amir Shmuel;Kâmil Uğurbil

  • Mapping the Organization of Axis of Motion Selective Features in Human Area MT Using High-Field fMRI

    Jan Zimmermann;Rainer Goebel;Rainer Goebel;Federico De Martino;Federico De Martino;Pierre-Francois van de Moortele

  • Pyramidal neurons are "neurogenic hubs" in the neurovascular coupling response to whisker stimulation.

    Clotilde Lecrux;Xavier Toussay;Ara Kocharyan;Priscilla Fernandes

  • Zoomed Functional Imaging in the Human Brain at 7 Tesla with Simultaneous High Spatial and High Temporal Resolution

    Josef Pfeuffer;Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele;Essa Yacoub;Amir Shmuel

  • Investigation of the initial dip in fMRI at 7 Tesla.

    Essa Yacoub;Amir Shmuel;Josef Pfeuffer;Pierre‐Francois Van De Moortele

  • Global and system-specific resting-state fMRI fluctuations are uncorrelated: principal component analysis reveals anti-correlated networks.

    Felix Carbonell;Pierre Bellec;Amir Shmuel

  • Perfusion‐based high‐resolution functional imaging in the human brain at 7 Tesla

    Josef Pfeuffer;Josef Pfeuffer;Gregor Adriany;Amir Shmuel;Essa Yacoub

  • Retinotopic axis specificity and selective clustering of feedback projections from V2 to V1 in the owl monkey.

    Amir Shmuel;Maria Korman;Anna Sterkin;Michal Harel

  • Mechanisms underlying decoding at 7 T: ocular dominance columns, broad structures, and macroscopic blood vessels in V1 convey information on the stimulated eye.

    Amir Shmuel;Denis Chaimow;Guenter Raddatz;Kamil Ugurbil;Kamil Ugurbil

  • Accelerating the Evolution of Nonhuman Primate Neuroimaging

    Michael Milham;Christopher I. Petkov;Daniel S. Margulies;Charles E. Schroeder

  • Variability of the coupling of blood flow and oxygen metabolism responses in the brain: a problem for interpreting BOLD studies but potentially a new window on the underlying neural activity

    Richard B. Buxton;Valerie E. M. Griffeth;Aaron B. Simon;Farshad Moradi

  • Performance of machine learning methods applied to structural MRI and ADAS cognitive scores in diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease

    Salim Lahmiri;Amir Shmuel;Amir Shmuel

  • Neuronal correlates of spontaneous fluctuations in fMRI signals in monkey visual cortex: implications for functional connectivity at rest

    D Leopold

Frequent Co-Authors

Kamil Ugurbil
Kamil Ugurbil University of Minnesota
Essa Yacoub
Essa Yacoub University of Minnesota
Nikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis Chinese Academy of Sciences
Pedro Rosa-Neto
Pedro Rosa-Neto McGill University
Alain Dagher
Alain Dagher Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Pierre Bellec
Pierre Bellec University of Montreal
Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele
Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele University of Minnesota
Xiaoping Hu
Xiaoping Hu University of California, Riverside
John C.S. Breitner
John C.S. Breitner Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Amiram Grinvald
Amiram Grinvald Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of related careers in mental health, counseling, and psychology. Many students interested in the brain and behavior choose to further their education and skill set with specialized online degrees.

If you are considering a focus in counseling, there are CACREP online masters in counseling programs that offer high quality and flexibility, ensuring your education meets industry standards. For those prioritizing cost, you can also find the most affordable online counseling degrees that do not compromise on comprehensive training.

Students interested in relationship or family dynamics may explore the best online MFT programs as a pathway to becoming a marriage and family therapist. Additionally, those who want to specialize in mental health assessment and intervention can consider an affordable online masters in clinical psychology.

Each of these online degree pathways combines scientific foundations with practical skills, making them ideal complements to a background in neuroscience and expanding your career opportunities in healthcare, research, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Amir Shmuel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles