World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frances R. Frankenburg

Frances R. Frankenburg

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
23919
World Ranking
18369
National Ranking
9168

Frances R. Frankenburg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances R. Frankenburg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 194 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frances R. Frankenburg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances R. Frankenburg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frances R. Frankenburg is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on clinical psychology and psychiatry and mental health. Their work encompasses subfields including philosophy, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and physiology.

The main topics addressed in Frances R. Frankenburg's publications include personality disorders and psychopathology, psychotherapy techniques and applications, schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health and psychiatry, suicide and self-harm studies, bipolar disorder and treatment, and psychosomatic disorders and their treatments.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Frances R. Frankenburg include Mary C. Zanarini, Isabel V. Glass, Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, Christina M. Temes, and Tess Gecha.

Their publications appear repeatedly in several scholarly venues. The most frequent publication venues are Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, the Journal of Personality Disorders, International Gambling Studies, and the Journal of Trauma & Dissociation.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Frances R. Frankenburg cover a range of topics related to personality disorders and clinical outcomes. These include:

  • Voltaire and gambling, 2021, International Gambling Studies
  • Course and predictors of social security disability insurance in patients with borderline personality disorder over 24 years of prospective follow-up, 2023, Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
  • Levels of Depersonalization and Derealization Reported by Recovered and Non-recovered Borderline Patients Over 20 Years of Prospective Follow-up, 2020, Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • The 24-Year Course of Symptomatic Disorders in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder and Personality-Disordered Comparison Subjects, 2024, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Experiential avoidance in participants with borderline personality disorder and other personality disorders, 2024, Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

Best Publications

  • Axis I Comorbidity of Borderline Personality Disorder

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;Elyse D. Dubo;Amy E. Sickel

  • Reported pathological childhood experiences associated with the development of borderline personality disorder

    Mary C. Zanarini;A. A. Williams;R. E. Lewis;R. B. Reich

  • Clozapine. A novel antipsychotic agent.

    R J Baldessarini;F R Frankenburg

  • A Screening Measure for BPD: The McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD)

    Mary C. Zanarini;A. Anna Vujanovic;Elizabeth A. Parachini;Jennifer L. Boulanger

  • The Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines: Discriminating BPD from other Axis II Disorders

    Mary C. Zanarini;John G. Gunderson;Frances R. Frankenburg;Deborah L. Chauncey

  • The longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology: 6-year prospective follow-up of the phenomenology of borderline personality disorder.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen;Kenneth R. Silk

  • Axis I comorbidity in patients with borderline personality disorder: 6-year follow-up and prediction of time to remission.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen;D. Bradford Reich

  • Childhood experiences of borderline patients.

    Mary C. Zanarini;John G. Gunderson;John G. Gunderson;Margaret F. Marino;Margaret F. Marino;Elizabeth O. Schwartz;Elizabeth O. Schwartz

  • Attainment and maintenance of reliability of Axis I and II Disorders over the course of a longitudinal study

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg

  • Prediction of the 10-year course of borderline personality disorder.

    Mary C Zanarini;Frances R Frankenburg;John Hennen;D Bradford Reich

  • Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects: a 16-year prospective follow-up study.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;D. Bradford Reich;Garrett Fitzmaurice

  • The subsyndromal phenomenology of borderline personality disorder: A 10-year follow-up study

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;D. Bradford Reich;Kenneth R. Silk

  • Zanarini Rating Scale For Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD): A Continuous Measure of DSM-IV Borderline Psychopathology

    Mary C. Zanarini

  • Severity of reported childhood sexual abuse and its relationship to severity of borderline psychopathology and psychosocial impairment among borderline inpatients.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Lynne Yong;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen

  • Omega-3 Fatty Acid Treatment of Women With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg

  • The McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD): Overview and implications of the first six years of prospective follow-up

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen;D. Bradford Reich

  • The Diagnostic Interview for Personality Disorders: Interrater and test-retest reliability.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;Frances R. Frankenburg;Deborah L. Chauncey;Deborah L. Chauncey;John G. Gunderson;John G. Gunderson

  • Treatment histories of borderline inpatients.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;Gagan S. Khera;Julieta Bleichmar

  • Mental health service utilization by borderline personality disorder patients and Axis II comparison subjects followed prospectively for 6 years.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Frances R. Frankenburg;John Hennen;Kenneth R. Silk

  • Severity of Reported Childhood Sexual Abuse and Its Relationship to Severity of Borderline Psychopathology and Psychosocial Impairment Among Borderline Inpatients

    M C Zanarini;L Yong;F R Frankenburg

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary C. Zanarini
Mary C. Zanarini Harvard University
Garrett M. Fitzmaurice
Garrett M. Fitzmaurice Harvard University
John G. Gunderson
John G. Gunderson Harvard University
John Hennen
John Hennen Harvard University
James I. Hudson
James I. Hudson Harvard University
Kenneth R. Silk
Kenneth R. Silk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ross J. Baldessarini
Ross J. Baldessarini Harvard University
Harrison G. Pope
Harrison G. Pope Harvard University
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd University of Utah
Anka A. Vujanovic
Anka A. Vujanovic University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine doesn't always mean following the traditional MD track. There are a variety of related online degrees and flexible pathways that can lead to rewarding roles in healthcare. For instance, you may be interested in programs that support a more holistic approach, such as nutrition degrees online, which focus on the science of food and its impact on health.

Leadership roles in hospitals and clinics often require advanced education, making online mha programs (Master of Health Administration) a popular choice for those aspiring to manage health services. If you’re a registered nurse looking to advance your qualifications without additional clinical hours, consider rn to bsn online no clinicals options, which offer flexible curricula tailored for busy professionals.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest level of clinical practice, the shortest dnp program online pathways can allow you to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently. These diverse online programs offer convenient entry points to dynamic careers in healthcare without sacrificing quality or flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Frances R. Frankenburg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles