World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6148
World Ranking
8111
National Ranking
682

Oliver Stork publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Stork sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 131 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Oliver Stork D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Stork sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver Stork is affiliated with Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany. Their research activity spans primarily the fields of Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions to subfields including Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Stork's work addresses diverse topics such as Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Tryptophan and brain disorders, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology.

Recent publications include:

  • Short antisense oligonucleotides alleviate the pleiotropic toxicity of RNA harboring expanded CGG repeats, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis leads to activation of microglia and impairment of cholinergic gamma oscillations in the hippocampus, 2021, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Hippocampal GABAergic interneurons and their co-localized neuropeptides in stress vulnerability and resilience, 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Synaptic control of DNA methylation involves activity-dependent degradation of DNMT3A1 in the nucleus, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Region-specific involvement of interneuron subpopulations in trauma-related pathology and resilience, 2020, Neurobiology of Disease

The most frequent publication venues for Stork's research are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurobiology of Disease
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • IBRO Neuroscience Reports
  • Neurobiology of Stress

Frequent collaborators include Gürsel Çalışkan, Anne Albrecht, Emre Kul, Miguel del Ángel, and Yunus Emre Demiray.

Best Publications

  • Amygdalar and Hippocampal Theta Rhythm Synchronization During Fear Memory Retrieval

    Thomas Seidenbecher;T. Rao Laxmi;Oliver Stork;Hans-Christian Pape

  • Postnatal development of a GABA deficit and disturbance of neural functions in mice lacking GAD65

    Oliver Stork;Feng Yun Ji;Koichi Kaneko;Simone Stork

  • Animal models of PTSD: a challenge to be met

    Gal Richter-Levin;Oliver Stork;Mathias V. Schmidt

  • Recovery of emotional behaviour in neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) null mutant mice through transgenic expression of NCAM180.

    O. Stork;H. Welzl;D. Wolfer;T. Schuster;T. Schuster

  • Anxiety and increased 5-HT1A receptor response in NCAM null mutant mice.

    Oliver Stork;Hans Welzl;Carsten T. Wotjak;Carsten T. Wotjak;Daniel Hoyer

  • Increased intermale aggression and neuroendocrine response in mice deficient for the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM).

    O. Stork;H. Welzl;H. Cremer;M. Schachner

  • Theta activity in neurons and networks of the amygdala related to long-term fear memory.

    Hans-Christian Pape;Rajeevan T. Narayanan;Jan Smid;Oliver Stork

  • Generalisation of conditioned fear and its behavioural expression in mice.

    T.Rao Laxmi;Oliver Stork;Hans-Christian Pape

  • Identification of a neuropeptide S responsive circuitry shaping amygdala activity via the endopiriform nucleus.

    Susanne Meis;Jorge Ricardo Bergado-Acosta;Yuchio Yanagawa;Kunihiko Obata

  • Stress-induced metaplasticity: from synapses to behavior.

    M. V. Schmidt;W. C. Abraham;M. Maroun;O. Stork

  • Dissociated theta phase synchronization in amygdalo- hippocampal circuits during various stages of fear memory

    Rajeevan T. Narayanan;Thomas Seidenbecher;Christian Kluge;Jorge Bergado

  • Critical role of the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase in consolidation and generalization of Pavlovian fear memory

    Jorge R. Bergado-Acosta;Susan Sangha;Rajeevan T. Narayanan;Kunihiko Obata

  • Deficiency of the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase impairs extinction of cued but not contextual fear memory.

    Susan Sangha;Rajeevan T. Narayanan;Jorge R. Bergado-Acosta;Oliver Stork

  • Reduction of extracellular GABA in the mouse amygdala during and following confrontation with a conditioned fear stimulus.

    Oliver Stork;Feng Yun Ji;Kunihiko Obata

  • Identification of genes expressed in the amygdala during the formation of fear memory.

    Oliver Stork;Simone Stork;Hans-Christian Pape;Kunihiko Obata

  • mTORC1 Inhibitors Suppress Meningioma Growth in Mouse Models

    Doreen Pachow;Nadine Andrae;Nadine Kliese;Frank Angenstein

  • Memory formation and the regulation of gene expression

    Unknown

  • Genes and mechanisms in the amygdala involved in the formation of fear memory.

    Hans-Christian Pape;Oliver Stork

  • Altered conditioned fear behavior in glutamate decarboxylase 65 null mutant mice.

    O. Stork;H. Yamanaka;S. Stork;N. Kume

  • Theta resynchronization during reconsolidation of remote contextual fear memory.

    Rajeevan T. Narayanan;Thomas Seidenbecher;Susan Sangha;Oliver Stork

  • SIPA1L2 controls trafficking and local signaling of TrkB-containing amphisomes at presynaptic terminals.

    Maria Andres-Alonso;Maria Andres-Alonso;Mohamed Raafet Ammar;Ioana Butnaru;Guilherme M Gomes

  • Cell adhesion molecules: key players in memory consolidation?

    Hans Welzl;Oliver Stork

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Christian Pape
Hans-Christian Pape University of Münster
Gal Richter-Levin
Gal Richter-Levin University of Haifa
Michael R. Kreutz
Michael R. Kreutz Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Melitta Schachner
Melitta Schachner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Kunihiko Obata
Kunihiko Obata The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI
Yuchio Yanagawa
Yuchio Yanagawa Gunma University
Thomas Seidenbecher
Thomas Seidenbecher University of Münster
Eckart D. Gundelfinger
Eckart D. Gundelfinger Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Uwe Heinemann
Uwe Heinemann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Herbert Schwegler
Herbert Schwegler Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of related fields. If you’re drawn to the human mind and behavior, consider exploring psychology degrees online. These programs often overlap with neuroscience topics and can lead to roles in mental health, counseling, or research.

For those interested in social work, many msw programs with high acceptance rate provide flexible options to earn a Master of Social Work online. These programs prepare graduates to help individuals and communities manage life’s challenges, which often intersect with neurological and psychological issues.

If your goal is advanced clinical practice or research, pursuing an online psyd may be the right pathway. These doctorates focus on clinical skills in psychology and can be completed with online coursework and supervised practicum experiences.

Alternatively, online masters mft programs offer a streamlined route to becoming a marriage and family therapist. These programs provide training in counseling and therapeutic approaches, which are highly relevant to graduates with neuroscience backgrounds interested in mental health care.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Stork

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles