World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
22125
World Ranking
6199
National Ranking
474

Majlinda Lako publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Majlinda Lako sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 317 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Majlinda Lako D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Majlinda Lako sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Majlinda Lako is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a specific focus on molecular biology and ophthalmology.

The scientist's work covers various subfields including molecular biology, ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Majlinda Lako's main research topics include:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering

The scientist has published extensively, contributing to journals with a strong focus on eye-related biomedical topics. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Ocular Surface
  • Stem Cells
  • Stem Cells Translational Medicine
  • Ophthalmology and Therapy

Co-authorship is an important aspect of Majlinda Lako's research. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Lyle Armstrong
  • Joseph Collin
  • Birthe Dorgau
  • Rachel Queen
  • Francisco C. Figueiredo

Notable recent publications authored or co-authored by Majlinda Lako include:

  • A single cell atlas of human cornea that defines its development, limbal progenitor cells and their interactions with the immune cells, 2021, The Ocular Surface
  • Co-expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the superficial adult human conjunctival, limbal and corneal epithelium suggests an additional route of entry via the ocular surface, 2020, The Ocular Surface
  • Germline TET2 loss of function causes childhood immunodeficiency and lymphoma, 2020, Blood
  • Transplanted Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Photoreceptor Precursors Elicit Conventional and Unusual Light Responses in Mice With Advanced Retinal Degeneration, 2021, Stem Cells
  • Pathophysiology of aniridia-associated keratopathy: Developmental aspects and unanswered questions, 2021, The Ocular Surface

Best Publications

  • Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative

    Oluseun Adewumi;Behrouz Aflatoonian;Lars Ahrlund-Richter;Michal Amit

  • A gene related to Caenorhabditis elegans spermatogenesis factor fer-1 is mutated in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B

    R Bashir;S Britton;T Strachan;S Keers

  • Ethical and Safety Issues of Stem Cell-Based Therapy.

    Volarevic;BS Markovic;M Gazdic;A Volarevic

  • The role of PI3K/AKT, MAPK/ERK and NFκβ signalling in the maintenance of human embryonic stem cell pluripotency and viability highlighted by transcriptional profiling and functional analysis

    Lyle Armstrong;Owen Hughes;Sun Yung;Louise Hyslop

  • Screening ethnically diverse human embryonic stem cells identifies a chromosome 20 minimal amplicon conferring growth advantage

    Katherine Amps;Peter W. Andrews;George Anyfantis;Lyle Armstrong

  • Downregulation of NANOG induces differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to extraembryonic lineages.

    Louise Hyslop;Miodrag Stojkovic;Lyle Armstrong;Theresia Walter

  • Efficient Hematopoietic Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells on Stromal Cells Derived from Hematopoietic Niches

    Maria H. Ledran;Anna Krassowska;Lyle Armstrong;Ian Dimmick

  • Human induced pluripotent stem cell lines show stress defense mechanisms and mitochondrial regulation similar to those of human embryonic stem cells.

    Lyle Armstrong;Katarzyna Tilgner;Gabriele Saretzki;Stuart P. Atkinson

  • An Autogeneic Feeder Cell System That Efficiently Supports Growth of Undifferentiated Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    Petra Stojkovic;Majlinda Lako;Rebecca Stewart;Stefan Przyborski

  • Stress defense in murine embryonic stem cells is superior to that of various differentiated murine cells.

    Gabriele Saretzki;Lyle Armstrong;Alan Leake;Majlinda Lako

  • Phenotypic characterization of murine primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells isolated on basis of aldehyde dehydrogenase activity

    Lyle Armstrong;Miodrag Stojkovic;Ian Dimmick;Sajjad Ahmad

  • Downregulation of multiple stress defense mechanisms during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.

    Gabriele Saretzki;Gabriele Saretzki;Theresia Walter;Stuart Atkinson;Jõao F. Passos

  • Derivation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells from Developing and Arrested Embryos

    Xin Zhang;Petra Stojkovic;Stefan Przyborski;Michael Cooke

  • Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Corneal Epithelial‐Like Cells by In Vitro Replication of the Corneal Epithelial Stem Cell Niche

    Sajjad Ahmad;Rebecca Stewart;Sun Yung;Sai Kolli;Sai Kolli

  • Derivation of human embryonic stem cells from day-8 blastocysts recovered after three-step in vitro culture.

    Miodrag Stojkovic;Majlinda Lako;Petra Stojkovic;Rebecca Stewart

  • 13 years of cultured limbal epithelial cell therapy: a review of the outcomes

    Oliver Baylis;Francisco Figueiredo;Francisco Figueiredo;Christin Henein;Majlinda Lako

  • Derivation of a human blastocyst after heterologous nuclear transfer to donated oocytes.

    Miodrag Stojkovic;Petra Stojkovic;Christine Leary;Vanessa Jane Hall

  • Isolation of primordial germ cells from differentiating human embryonic stem cells.

    Katarzyna Tilgner;Stuart P. Atkinson;Anna Golebiewska;Miodrag Stojković

  • Hair follicle dermal cells repopulate the mouse haematopoietic system

    Majlinda Lako;Lyle Armstrong;Paul M. Cairns;Sue Harris

  • A role for NANOG in G1 to S transition in human embryonic stem cells through direct binding of CDK6 and CDC25A

    Xin Zhang;Irina Neganova;Stefan Przyborski;Chunbo Yang

Frequent Co-Authors

Lyle Armstrong
Lyle Armstrong Newcastle University
Miodrag Stojkovic
Miodrag Stojkovic University of Kragujevac
Stefan Przyborski
Stefan Przyborski Durham University
Evelyne Sernagor
Evelyne Sernagor Newcastle University
Gabriele Saretzki
Gabriele Saretzki Newcastle University
Susan Lindsay
Susan Lindsay Newcastle University
Tom Strachan
Tom Strachan Newcastle University
Alan O Trounson
Alan O Trounson Monash University
David J. Elliott
David J. Elliott Newcastle University
Natalio Krasnogor
Natalio Krasnogor Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Majlinda Lako

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles