World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leslie C. Baxter

Leslie C. Baxter

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 42 7541 6955 3251 2937 119 10037

Leslie C. Baxter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leslie C. Baxter between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leslie C. Baxter published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 17 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 11 publications
1990 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leslie C. Baxter: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 5
2007 2
2008 9
2009 4
2010 4
2011 7
2012 4
2013 3
2014 8
2015 9
2016 7
2017 10
2018 7
2019 13
2020 5
2021 4
2022 4
2023 8
2024 6
2025 11
Total 146
Download as CSV

Leslie C. Baxter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie C. Baxter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 119 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 119
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Leslie C. Baxter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie C. Baxter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to high-speed digital communication networks

Overview

Leslie C. Baxter is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical and neuroscience research. Their work primarily focuses on fields such as Medicine and Neuroscience, with specific attention to subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Cancer Research, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's research covers a variety of central topics, including:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Recent publications by Leslie C. Baxter illustrate contributions to high-impact papers in several journals. Notable papers include:

  • "Preliminary Assessment of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MRI (IVIM-DWI) Metrics in Alzheimer's Disease" (2020) published in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • "Integrated molecular and multiparametric MRI mapping of high-grade glioma identifies regional biologic signatures" (2023) published in Nature Communications
  • "Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies" (2020) published in American Journal of Neuroradiology
  • "Uncertainty quantification in the radiogenomics modeling of EGFR amplification in glioblastoma" (2021) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Effects of prosody on the cognitive and neural resources supporting sentence comprehension: A behavioral and lesion-symptom mapping study" (2020) published in Brain and Language

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Baxter include Leland Hu, Richard S. Zimmerman, Kristin R. Swanson, Bernard R. Bendok, and Chandan Krishna, with collaboration counts ranging from 14 to 20 joint works.

Publication venues with significant contributions by Baxter include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • PLoS ONE

Leslie C. Baxter was awarded the IEEE Fellow distinction in 2009 for contributions to high-speed digital communication networks, a recognition that aligns with expertise in technical and scientific fields.

Best Publications

  • Neural correlates of self-reflection

    Sterling C. Johnson;Leslie C. Baxter;Lana S. Wilder;James G. Pipe

  • Retinal degeneration in the rd mouse is caused by a defect in the β subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase

    Cathy Bowes;Tiansen Li;Michael Danciger;Michael Danciger;Leslie C. Baxter

  • Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II

    Adriana Di Martino;David O'Connor;David O'Connor;Bosi Chen;Kaat Alaerts

  • The Murine Cone Photoreceptor: A Single Cone Type Expresses Both S and M Opsins with Retinal Spatial Patterning

    M.L Applebury;M.P Antoch;L.C Baxter;L.L.Y Chun

  • Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Related Memory Decline and the APOE ε4 Effect

    Richard J. Caselli;Amylou C. Dueck;David Osborne;Marwan N. Sabbagh

  • Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Values to Differentiate High-Grade Glioma Recurrence from Posttreatment Radiation Effect: Direct Correlation between Image-Guided Tissue Histopathology and Localized Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging Measurements

    L.S. Hu;L.C. Baxter;K.A. Smith;B.G. Feuerstein

  • Longitudinal changes in cognition and behavior in asymptomatic carriers of the APOE e4 allele

    Richard J. Caselli;E. M. Reiman;D. Osborne;J. G. Hentz

  • Reevaluating the imaging definition of tumor progression: perfusion MRI quantifies recurrent glioblastoma tumor fraction, pseudoprogression, and radiation necrosis to predict survival

    Leland S. Hu;Jennifer M. Eschbacher;Joseph E. Heiserman;Amylou C. Dueck

  • Radiogenomics to characterize regional genetic heterogeneity in glioblastoma

    Leland S. Hu;Leland S. Hu;Shuluo Ning;Jennifer M. Eschbacher;Leslie C. Baxter

  • Sex differences in semantic language processing: a functional MRI study.

    L.C. Baxter;A.J. Saykin;L.A. Flashman;S.C. Johnson

  • Traumatic brain injury and grey matter concentration: a preliminary voxel based morphometry study.

    S D Gale;L Baxter;N Roundy;S C Johnson

  • Impaired platelet mitochondrial activity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

    Jon Valla;Lonnie Schneider;Tracy Niedzielko;Keith D. Coon

  • The relationship between fMRI activation and cerebral atrophy: comparison of normal aging and alzheimer disease.

    Sterling C. Johnson;Andrew J. Saykin;Andrew J. Saykin;Leslie C. Baxter;Leslie C. Baxter;Laura A. Flashman;Laura A. Flashman

  • Enhanced pain-induced activity of pain-processing regions in a case-control study of episodic migraine:

    Todd J. Schwedt;Catherine D. Chong;Chia Chun Chiang;Leslie Baxter

  • Optimized preload leakage-correction methods to improve the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in posttreatment gliomas.

    Leland S. Hu;L. C. Baxter;D. S. Pinnaduwage;D. S. Pinnaduwage;T. L. Paine

  • Anteroposterior somatotopy of innocuous cooling activation focus in human dorsal posterior insular cortex.

    Le H. Hua;Irina A. Strigo;Leslie C. Baxter;Sterling C. Johnson

  • Hippocampal adaptation to face repetition in healthy elderly and mild cognitive impairment.

    Sterling C. Johnson;Leslie C. Baxter;Lana Susskind-Wilder;Donald J. Connor

  • Multi-Parametric MRI and Texture Analysis to Visualize Spatial Histologic Heterogeneity and Tumor Extent in Glioblastoma

    Leland S. Hu;Leland S. Hu;Shuluo Ning;Jennifer M. Eschbacher;Nathan Gaw

  • Correlations between Perfusion MR Imaging Cerebral Blood Volume, Microvessel Quantification, and Clinical Outcome Using Stereotactic Analysis in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma

    Leland S. Hu;Leland S. Hu;J. M. Eschbacher;A. C. Dueck;J. E. Heiserman

  • Sex differences on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised in the elderly: normative data in 172 participants.

    Shawn D. Gale;Leslie Baxter;Donald J. Connor;Anne Herring

Frequent Co-Authors

Amylou C. Dueck
Amylou C. Dueck Mayo Clinic
Eric M. Reiman
Eric M. Reiman Arizona State University
Teresa Wu
Teresa Wu Arizona State University
Sterling C. Johnson
Sterling C. Johnson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kewei Chen
Kewei Chen Arizona State University
Marwan N. Sabbagh
Marwan N. Sabbagh Lou Ruvo Brain Institute
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Burt G. Feuerstein
Burt G. Feuerstein University of California, San Francisco
Laura A. Flashman
Laura A. Flashman Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Neuroscience, exploring flexible education options is key. Pursuing an online bachelor's degree can offer accelerated paths to graduation while allowing you to balance other commitments. Many top universities now provide robust online programs in health, psychology, and biological sciences, which can lay a strong foundation for a career in Neuroscience.

When considering your future, researching the best degree in the world can help you align your studies with lucrative fields. Neuroscience intersects with some of the most profitable majors, including biomedical engineering, data analysis, and health sciences. These disciplines open doors to high-paying and innovative roles in medicine, research, and technology.

Financial accessibility is also important. If affordability matters to you, consider enrolling in an online school that accepts fafsa to potentially lower tuition costs and gain access to federal financial aid. With the right strategy, you can develop a rewarding career in Neuroscience while managing your educational expenses wisely.

Best Scientists Citing Leslie C. Baxter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles