World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7485 7192 109 109 163 5857

Aleksi Lehtonen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aleksi Lehtonen between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aleksi Lehtonen published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2023. 58 of the 247 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2023. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 31 publications
1980 2025

247 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aleksi Lehtonen: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 3
2005 5
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 2
2010 3
2011 3
2012 8
2013 4
2014 8
2015 8
2016 21
2017 11
2018 13
2019 18
2020 12
2021 18
2022 9
2023 31
2024 27
2025 31
Total 247
Download as CSV

Aleksi Lehtonen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aleksi Lehtonen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 163
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Aleksi Lehtonen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aleksi Lehtonen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Aleksi Lehtonen is affiliated with the Finnish Forest Research Institute in Finland. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with specific attention to subfields including global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, ecology, atmospheric science, and soil science.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably peatlands and wetlands ecology, forest ecology and management, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, fire effects on ecosystems, and forest management and policy.

Lehtonen has contributed to numerous publications with a strong presence in various venues. Frequent publication platforms include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Forest Ecology and Management, SSRN Electronic Journal, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Policy briefs.

Collaborations form a significant part of Lehtonen's work, with frequent co-authors including Raisa Mäkipää, Mikko Peltoniemi, Boris Ťupek, Juha Heikkinen, and Miguel Á. Zavala.

Among recent papers are:

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • How does management affect soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas fluxes in boreal and temperate forests? - A review, 2022, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Selection Cuttings as a Tool to Control Water Table Level in Boreal Drained Peatland Forests, 2020, Frontiers in Earth Science
  • On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution, 2021, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
  • Demographic performance of European tree species at their hot and cold climatic edges, 2020, Journal of Ecology

Best Publications

  • Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests

    A Lehtonen;R Mäkipää;J Heikkinen;R Sievänen

  • Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation

    Z. Somogyi;E. Cienciala;R. Mäkipää;P. Muukkonen

  • Carbon accumulation in Finland's forests 1922–2004 – an estimate obtained by combination of forest inventory data with modelling of biomass, litter and soil

    Jari Liski;Jari Liski;Aleksi Lehtonen;Taru Palosuo;Mikko Peltoniemi

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties

    Anna Maria Virkkala;Juha Aalto;Juha Aalto;Brendan M. Rogers;Torbern Tagesson;Torbern Tagesson

  • Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass – A comparative study

    Hans Petersson;Sören Holm;Göran Ståhl;David Alger

  • Generic methodologies applicable to multiple land-use categories

    Stephen Michael Ogle;Werner Alexander Kurz;Carly Green;Andrea Brandon

  • How does management affect soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas fluxes in boreal and temperate forests? – A review

    Unknown

  • Estimation of the biomass stock of trees in Sweden: comparison of biomass equations and age-dependent biomass expansion factors

    Anneli Jalkanen;Raisa Mäkipää;Göran Ståhl;Aleksi Lehtonen

  • Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare?: a systematic review protocol

    Gillian Petrokofsky;Hideki Kanamaru;Frédéric Achard;Scott J Goetz

  • Continental mapping of forest ecosystem functions reveals a high but unrealised potential for forest multifunctionality.

    Fons van der Plas;Fons van der Plas;Sophia Ratcliffe;Paloma Ruiz-Benito;Paloma Ruiz-Benito;Michael Scherer-Lorenzen

  • Modes of functional biodiversity control on tree productivity across the European continent

    Sophia Ratcliffe;Mario Liebergesell;Paloma Ruiz-Benito;Paloma Ruiz-Benito;Jaime Madrigal González

  • Forest carbon allocation modelling under climate change.

    Katarína Merganičová;Ján Merganič;Aleksi Lehtonen;Giorgio Vacchiano

  • Comparison of linear and mixed-effect regression models and a k-nearest neighbour approach for estimation of single-tree biomass

    Lutz FehrmannL. Fehrmann;Lutz FehrmannL. Fehrmann;Aleksi LehtonenA. Lehtonen;Aleksi LehtonenA. Lehtonen;Christoph KleinnC. Kleinn;Christoph KleinnC. Kleinn;Erkki TomppoE. Tomppo;Erkki TomppoE. Tomppo

  • Identifying the tree species compositions that maximize ecosystem functioning in European forests

    Lander Baeten;Helge Bruelheide;Fons van der Plas;Stephan Kambach

  • An examination of in situ rock stress estimation using the Kaiser effect

    A. Lehtonen;J.W. Cosgrove;J.A. Hudson;E. Johansson

  • Estimating foliage biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) plots

    Aleksi Lehtonen

  • Impacts of forest biomass removal on soil nutrient status under climate change: a catchment-based modelling study for Finland

    Julian Aherne;Maximilian Posch;Martin Forsius;Aleksi Lehtonen

  • Climate- and successional-related changes in functional composition of European forests are strongly driven by tree mortality.

    Paloma Ruiz‐Benito;Paloma Ruiz‐Benito;Sophia Ratcliffe;Miguel A. Zavala;Jordi Martínez‐Vilalta

  • Uncertainty estimation of biomass expansion factors for Norway spruce in the Czech Republic

    Aleksi Lehtonen;Emil Cienciala;Fedor Tatarinov;Raisa Mäkipää

  • Needle and branch biomass turnover rates of Norway spruce (Picea abies)

    P. Muukkonen;A. Lehtonen

  • Available and missing data to model impact of climate change on European forests

    Paloma Ruiz-Benito;Giorgio Vacchiano;Emily R. Lines;Christopher P.O. Reyer

  • Potential litterfall of Scots pine branches in southern Finland

    Aleksi Lehtonen;Risto Sievänen;Annikki Mäkelä;Raisa Mäkipää

  • A multi-model comparison of soil carbon assessment of a coniferous forest stand

    Taru Palosuo;Bente Foereid;Magnus Svensson;Narasinha Shurpali

  • Estimation of the biomass stock of trees in Sweden

    Anneli Jalkanen;Raisa Mäkipää;Göran Ståhl;Aleksi Lehtonen

Frequent Co-Authors

Raisa Mäkipää
Raisa Mäkipää Natural Resources Institute Finland
Paloma Ruiz-Benito
Paloma Ruiz-Benito University of Alcalá
Miguel A. Zavala
Miguel A. Zavala University of Alcalá
Christian Wirth
Christian Wirth Leipzig University
Annikki Mäkelä
Annikki Mäkelä University of Helsinki
Jari Liski
Jari Liski Finnish Meteorological Institute
Kristiina Regina
Kristiina Regina Natural Resources Institute Finland
Timo Penttilä
Timo Penttilä Natural Resources Institute Finland
Taru Palosuo
Taru Palosuo Natural Resources Institute Finland
Raija Laiho
Raija Laiho Natural Resources Institute Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open new career opportunities. Many professionals consider online doctoral programs without dissertation requirements to fast-track their education while balancing work and life commitments. These programs offer flexibility and are particularly appealing for those aiming to apply research practically rather than focusing heavily on academic thesis work.

Students interested in specialized education pathways may find value in the best EDS to EDD programs. These pathways provide a streamlined approach for those in education or environmental policy fields to enhance leadership and research skills without prolonged coursework.

Another relevant pathway includes online DSW programs. Social work intersects with Environmental Sciences through community health and sustainability efforts, making such programs valuable for professionals aiming to influence environmental justice and social well-being.

For those starting their academic journey or seeking flexible options, pursuing an accredited affordable online general studies degree offers a solid foundation. This degree allows students to customize their studies with environmental topics, providing broad knowledge and diverse skill sets to support varied career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Aleksi Lehtonen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles