World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
5049
World Ranking
5941
National Ranking
93

Timo Penttilä publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Penttilä sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 193 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Timo Penttilä D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Penttilä sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timo Penttilä is affiliated with the Natural Resources Institute Finland in Finland. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in agricultural and biological sciences. The work spans several subfields including ecology, global and planetary change, plant science, atmospheric science, and environmental chemistry.

The scientist's main research topics cover a range of ecosystem and environmental dynamics, particularly:

  • Peatlands and wetlands ecology
  • Botany and plant ecology studies
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Forest ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Forest management and policy

Timo Penttilä has published extensively, contributing to various scientific publication venues. Frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Biogeosciences

Their recent papers illustrate the focus on peatlands, carbon fluxes, and ecosystem processes in boreal and managed environments. Selected recent publications include:

  • Heterotrophic soil respiration in forestry-drained peatlands, 2024, Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Emission factors and their uncertainty for the exchange of CO2, CH4 and N2O in Finnish managed peatlands, 2024, Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Carbon dioxide and energy flux measurements in four northern-boreal ecosystems at Pallas, 2024, Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Vegetation controls of water and energy balance of a drained peatland forest: Responses to alternative harvesting practices, 2020, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Nitrous oxide emissions of undrained, forestry-drained, and rewetted boreal peatlands, 2020, Forest Ecology and Management

In their collaborative work, Penttilä often partners with colleagues such as Kari Minkkinen, Raija Laiho, Päivi Mäkiranta, Annalea Lohila, and Paavo Ojanen. These frequent co-authors have contributed to various aspects of environmental and ecosystem sciences in partnership with Penttilä.

Best Publications

  • Soil–atmosphere CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes in boreal forestry-drained peatlands

    Paavo Ojanen;Kari Minkkinen;Jukka Alm;Timo Penttilä

  • Dynamics of plant-mediated organic matter and nutrient cycling following water-level drawdown in boreal peatlands

    Raija Laiho;Raija Laiho;Harri Vasander;Timo Penttilä;Jukka Laine

  • The current greenhouse gas impact of forestry-drained boreal peatlands

    Paavo Ojanen;Kari Minkkinen;Timo Penttilä

  • Disentangling direct and indirect effects of water table drawdown on above and belowground plant litter decomposition: Consequences for accumulation of organic matter in boreal peatlands.

    Petra Straková;Petra Straková;Timo Penttilä;Jukka Laine;Raija Laiho

  • Heterotrophic soil respiration in forestry-drained peatlands

    K. Minkkinen;J. Laine;N. J. Shurpali;P. Maekiranta

  • Greenhouse gas flux measurements in a forestry-drained peatland indicate a large carbon sink

    Annalea Lohila;Kari Minkkinen;Mika Aurela;Juha-Pekka Tuovinen

  • Emission factors and their uncertainty for the exchange of CO2, CH4 and N2O in Finnish managed peatlands

    Jukka Alm;Narasinha J. Shurpali;Kari Minkkinen;Lasse Aro

  • Responses of aerobic microbial communities and soil respiration to water-level drawdown in a northern boreal fen

    Krista Jaatinen;Raija Laiho;Anita Vuorenmaa;Urko del Castillo

  • CH4 production and oxidation processes in a boreal fen ecosystem after long-term water table drawdown

    Kim Yrjälä;Tero Tuomivirta;Heli Juottonen;Anuliina Putkinen;Anuliina Putkinen

  • Responses of phenology and biomass production of boreal fens to climate warming under different water-table level regimes.

    Päivi Mäkiranta;Raija Laiho;Lauri Mehtätalo;Petra Straková

  • Responses of methanogenic and methanotrophic communities to warming in varying moisture regimes of two boreal fens

    Krista Peltoniemi;Raija Laiho;Heli Juottonen;Levente Bodrossy

  • Comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes and nitrogen budgets from an ombotrophic bog in Scotland and a minerotrophic sedge fen in Finland

    J. Drewer;A. Lohila;M. Aurela;T. Laurila

  • Responses of N2O fluxes to temperature, water table and N deposition in a northern boreal fen

    Annalea Lohila;Mika Aurela;Juha Hatakka;Mari Pihlatie

  • Could continuous cover forestry be an economically and environmentally feasible management option on drained boreal peatlands

    M. Nieminen;H. Hökkä;R. Laiho;A. Juutinen;A. Juutinen

  • Carbon dioxide and energy flux measurements in four northern-boreal ecosystems at Pallas

    Mika Aurela;Annalea Lohila;Juha-Pekka Tuovinen;Juha Hatakka

  • Decomposition of Scots pine fine woody debris in boreal conditions: Implications for estimating carbon pools and fluxes

    Petra Vávřová;Petra Vávřová;Timo Penttilä;Raija Laiho

  • Greenhouse gas and energy fluxes in a boreal peatland forest after clear-cutting

    Mika Korkiakoski;Juha-Pekka Tuovinen;Timo Penttilä;Sakari Sarkkola

  • Vegetation controls of water and energy balance of a drained peatland forest: Responses to alternative harvesting practices

    Kersti Leppä;Mika Korkiakoski;Mika Nieminen;Raija Laiho

  • Warming impacts on boreal fen CO2 exchange under wet and dry conditions.

    Anna M. Laine;Päivi Mäkiranta;Raija Laiho;Lauri Mehtätalo

  • Persistent carbon sink at a boreal drained bog forest.

    Kari Minkkinen;Paavo Ojanen;Timo Penttilä;Mika Aurela

  • Greenhouse impact due to different peat fuel utilisation chains in Finland — a life-cycle approach

    Johanna Kirkinen;Kari Minkkinen;Timo Penttilä;Soili Kojola

  • Individual-tree basal area growth models for Scots pine, pubescent birch and Norway spruce on drained peatlands in Finland.

    Hannu Hökkä;Virpi Alenius;Timo Penttilä

  • Tree stand volume as a scalar for methane fluxes in forestry-drained peatlands in Finland

    Kari Minkkinen;Timo Penttilä;Jukka Laine

Frequent Co-Authors

Raija Laiho
Raija Laiho Natural Resources Institute Finland
Annalea Lohila
Annalea Lohila Finnish Meteorological Institute
Juha-Pekka Tuovinen
Juha-Pekka Tuovinen Finnish Meteorological Institute
Tuomas Laurila
Tuomas Laurila Integrated Carbon Observation System
Kari Minkkinen
Kari Minkkinen University of Helsinki
Mika Aurela
Mika Aurela Finnish Meteorological Institute
Hannu Fritze
Hannu Fritze Natural Resources Institute Finland
Jukka Laine
Jukka Laine Natural Resources Institute Finland
Juha Hatakka
Juha Hatakka Finnish Meteorological Institute
Raisa Mäkipää
Raisa Mäkipää Natural Resources Institute Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to diverse interrelated fields that also value scientific inquiry and critical thinking. If you’re looking to broaden your career options, online degrees in neighboring disciplines offer flexible, affordable pathways tailored to different interests and backgrounds.

For those passionate about information management, a library science degree is a cost-effective choice, particularly for students seeking careers in research, archives, or data stewardship. Alternatively, if you’re interested in healthcare, you might consider joining the rapidly growing field of speech-language pathology. There are asha approved slp programs that ensure rigorous professional standards and strong job prospects.

If your undergraduate background differs, don’t worry—an slp bridge program online can help non-SLP majors transition into this rewarding career. Similarly, individuals with non-nursing degrees can leverage non nursing degree to bsn online programs to pursue nursing, addressing critical workforce needs.

These pathways not only support interdisciplinary learning, but also provide practical solutions for those aiming to shift fields or upskill efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Timo Penttilä

Trending Scientists