World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
8495
World Ranking
5550
National Ranking
80

Gudrun Koppen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gudrun Koppen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Gudrun Koppen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gudrun Koppen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Measuring DNA modifications with the comet assay: a compendium of protocols

    Unknown

  • Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: The challenge ahead

    William H Goodson;Leroy Lowe;David O Carpenter;Michael Gilbertson

  • Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results

    Peter Møller;Amaya Azqueta;Elisa Boutet-Robinet;Gudrun Koppen

  • Renal function, cytogenetic measurements, and sexual development in adolescents in relation to environmental pollutants: a feasibility study of biomarkers

    Jan A. Staessen;Tim Nawrot;Elly Den Hond;Lutgarde Thijs

  • The comet assay as a tool for human biomonitoring studies: the ComNet project.

    Andrew Collins;Gudrun Koppen;Vanessa Valdiglesias;Maria Dusinska

  • Intrauterine Exposure to Environmental Pollutants and Body Mass Index during the First 3 Years of Life

    Stijn L. Verhulst;Vera Nelen;Elly Den Hond;Gudrun Koppen

  • Economic benefits of methylmercury exposure control in Europe: Monetary value of neurotoxicity prevention

    Martine Bellanger;Céline Pichery;Dominique Aerts;Marika Berglund

  • First steps toward harmonized human biomonitoring in Europe: Demonstration project to perform human biomonitoring on a European scale

    Elly Den Hond;Eva Govarts;Hanny Willems;Roel Smolders

  • Urinary BPA measurements in children and mothers from six European member states: Overall results and determinants of exposure

    Adrian Covaci;Elly Den Hond;Tinne Geens;Eva Govarts

  • Human biomonitoring of emerging pollutants through non-invasive matrices: state of the art and future potential

    Andreia Alves;Andreia Alves;Agnieszka Kucharska;Agnieszka Kucharska;Claudio Erratico;Fuchao Xu

  • Human and Methodological Sources of Variability in the Measurement of Urinary 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydro-2 '-deoxyguanosine

    Lars Barregard;Peter Møller;Trine Henriksen;Vilas Mistry

  • Fourth WHO-coordinated survey of human milk for persistent organic pollutants (POPs): Belgian results.

    Ann Colles;Gudrun Koppen;Vincent Hanot;Vera Nelen

  • European birth cohorts for environmental health research

    Martine Vrijheid;Maribel Casas;Anna Bergström;Amanda Carmichael

  • Brominated flame retardants and perfluorinated chemicals, two groups of persistent contaminants in Belgian human blood and milk.

    Laurence Roosens;Wendy D’Hollander;Lieven Bervoets;Hans Reynders

  • Association of Thyroid Hormone Concentrations with Levels of Organochlorine Compounds in Cord Blood of Neonates

    Johan Maervoet;Griet Vermeir;Adrian Covaci;Nicolas Van Larebeke

  • Application of the comet assay in human biomonitoring: an hCOMET perspective

    Amaya Azqueta;Carina Ladeira;Lisa Giovannelli;Elisa Boutet-Robinet

  • Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in human milk: a biomonitoring study in rural areas of Flanders (Belgium).

    K. Croes;K. Croes;A. Colles;G. Koppen;E. Govarts

  • Influence of ambient air pollution on global DNA methylation in healthy adults : a seasonal follow-up

    Sofie De Prins;Gudrun Koppen;Griet Jacobs;Evi Dons;Evi Dons

  • Immunologic biomarkers in relation to exposure markers of PCBs and dioxins in Flemish adolescents (Belgium).

    Rosette L Van Den Heuvel;Gudrun Koppen;Jan A Staessen;Elly Den Hond

  • Blood Pressure and Same-Day Exposure to Air Pollution at School: Associations with Nano-Sized to Coarse PM in Children.

    Nicky Pieters;Gudrun Koppen;Martine Van Poppel;Sofie De Prins

Frequent Co-Authors

Greet Schoeters
Greet Schoeters University of Antwerp
Adrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci University of Antwerp
Tim S. Nawrot
Tim S. Nawrot Hasselt University
Marike Kolossa-Gehring
Marike Kolossa-Gehring German Environment Agency
Willy Baeyens
Willy Baeyens Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Inge Huybrechts
Inge Huybrechts International Agency For Research On Cancer
Andrew Collins
Andrew Collins University of Oslo
Holger M. Koch
Holger M. Koch Ruhr University Bochum
Peter Møller
Peter Møller University of Copenhagen
Peter Rudnai
Peter Rudnai National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like the eds to edd bridge program offer a path for educators to advance into leadership roles, integrating environmental education with administrative skills.

Social work is another intersecting field where knowledge of environmental issues is increasingly relevant. Enrolling in online dsw programs in social work equips students to address community health and sustainability challenges through policy and advocacy.

For those seeking flexible options, online degrees like the cheapest online general studies degree programs provide a broad educational foundation, allowing students to tailor coursework toward environmental topics alongside other interests.

Additionally, many students begin their academic journey with the easiest bachelor degree programs, which can be completed with less stress and still offer pathways into environmental science roles or further study.

Overall, combining environmental studies with these flexible online degrees can enhance career prospects and support a sustainable future.

Best Scientists Citing Gudrun Koppen

Recently Published Articles