World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10160 9510 5352 4887 87 5532

Dara R. Musher-Eizenman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dara R. Musher-Eizenman between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dara R. Musher-Eizenman published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2021. 3 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
2002 2025

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dara R. Musher-Eizenman: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 7
2004 4
2005 3
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 6
2010 5
2011 2
2012 2
2013 3
2014 4
2015 4
2016 7
2017 6
2018 5
2019 5
2020 8
2021 9
2022 5
2023 4
2024 1
2025 2
Total 97
Download as CSV

Dara R. Musher-Eizenman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dara R. Musher-Eizenman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 87
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dara R. Musher-Eizenman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dara R. Musher-Eizenman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dara R. Musher-Eizenman is affiliated with Bowling Green State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research primarily focuses on eating behaviors, obesity, and psychological well-being, with specific attention to clinical psychology and public health.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Culinary Culture and Tourism
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Several notable publications illustrate their research contributions. Recent papers include:

  • "A look at the intergenerational associations between self-compassion, body esteem, and emotional eating within dyads of mothers and their adult daughters," 2020, published in Body Image
  • "The interaction of negative psychological well-being and picky eating in relation to disordered eating in undergraduate students," 2021, published in Eating Behaviors
  • "Consequences of Picky Eating in College Students," 2021, published in Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
  • "From dieting to delight: Parenting strategies to promote children's positive body image and healthy relationship with food," 2021, published in Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
  • "'Quarantine 15': Pre-registered findings on stress and concern about weight gain before/during COVID-19 in relation to caregivers' eating pathology," 2021, published in Appetite

Musher-Eizenman frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • Appetite
  • Body Image
  • Journal of Pediatric Nursing
  • Eating Behaviors
  • Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Their collaboration network includes several frequent co-authors:

  • Lauren A. Dial
  • Emma I. Studer-Perez
  • Amy K. Jordan
  • Wesley R. Barnhart
  • Maria A. Kalantzis

Their research engages deep clinical psychology aspects related to eating and health behavior, combining insights from public health and nutrition science fields. They have contributed to understanding the dynamics of picky eating, emotional eating within family dyads, and psychological impact factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire: Validation of a New Measure of Parental Feeding Practices

    Dara Musher-Eizenman;Shayla Holub

  • Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: A content map to guide future research

    Amber E. Vaughn;Dianne S. Ward;Jennifer O. Fisher;Myles S. Faith

  • Body Size Stigmatization in Preschool Children: The Role of Control Attributions

    Dara R. Musher-Eizenman;Shayla C. Holub;Amy Barnhart Miller;Sara E. Goldstein

  • Eating when depressed, anxious, bored, or happy: Are emotional eating types associated with unique psychological and physical health correlates?

    Abby Braden;Dara Musher-Eizenman;Tanya Watford;Elizabeth Emley

  • Child and parent characteristics related to parental feeding practices. A cross-cultural examination in the US and France.

    Dara R. Musher-Eizenman;Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain;Shayla C. Holub;Emeline Leporc

  • Social-Cognitive Mediators of the Relation of Environmental and Emotion Regulation Factors to Children's Aggression.

    Dara R. Musher-Eizenman;Paul Boxer;Stephanie Danner;Eric F. Dubow

  • Eating when bored: revision of the emotional eating scale with a focus on boredom.

    Afton M. Koball;Molly R. Meers;Amy Storfer-Isser;Sarah E. Domoff

  • What are children thankful for? An archival analysis of gratitude before and after the attacks of September 11

    Anne K. Gordon;Dara R. Musher-Eizenman;Shayla C. Holub;John Dalrymple

  • Drive for thinness and drive for muscularity: opposite ends of the continuum or separate constructs?

    Courtney C Galliger Kelley;Jennie M Neufeld;Dara R Musher-Eizenman

  • Self-objectification and ideal body shape for men and women.

    Marissa E. Wagner Oehlhof;Dara R. Musher-Eizenman;Jennie M. Neufeld;Jessica C. Hauser

  • Food consumption by young children: A function of parental feeding goals and practices

    Allison E. Kiefner-Burmeister;Debra A. Hoffmann;Molly R. Meers;Afton M. Koball

  • Attitude and peer influences on adolescent substance use: The moderating effect of age, sex, and substance

    Dara R. Musher-Eizenman;Shayla C. Holub;Mitzi Arnett

  • The narrow range of acceptable body types of preschoolers and their mothers

    Dara R Musher-Eizenman;Shayla C Holub;Laura Edwards-Leeper;Anna V Persson

  • Exposure to "low-level" aggression in school: associations with aggressive behavior, future expectations, and perceived safety.

    Paul Boxer;Laura Edwards-Leeper;Sara E. Goldstein;Dara Musher-Eizenman

  • Psychosocial functioning and physical symptoms in heart failure patients: a within-individual approach.

    Robert A Carels;Dara Musher-Eizenman;Holly Cacciapaglia;Carlos I Pérez-Benı́tez

  • Developmental issues in school-based aggression prevention from a social-cognitive perspective.

    Paul Boxer;Sara E. Goldstein;Dara Musher-Eizenman;Eric F. Dubow;Eric F. Dubow

  • Weight bias in graduate school admissions.

    Jacob M. Burmeister;Allison E. Kiefner;Robert A. Carels;Dara R. Musher-Eizenman

  • Parental Feeding Practices in the United States and in France: Relationships with Child's Characteristics and Parent's Eating Behavior

    Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain;Dara Musher-Eizenman;Emeline Leporc;Shayla Holub

  • The impact of a prejudice-prevention television program on young children’s ideas about race

    Anna Persson;Dara R. Musher-Eizenman

  • Perceived control and academic performance: A comparison of high- and low-performing children on within-person change patterns

    Dara R. Musher-Eizenman;John R. Nesselroade;Bernhard Schmitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric F. Dubow
Eric F. Dubow Bowling Green State University
Paul Boxer
Paul Boxer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Robert A. Carels
Robert A. Carels East Carolina University
Sheryl O. Hughes
Sheryl O. Hughes Baylor College of Medicine
Thomas G. Power
Thomas G. Power Washington State University
Jennifer O. Fisher
Jennifer O. Fisher Temple University
Dianne S. Ward
Dianne S. Ward University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John R. Nesselroade
John R. Nesselroade University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in psychology, there are several related online degree options and career pathways available. One popular route is speech-language pathology, which combines aspects of communication, counseling, and behavioral sciences. This field offers the opportunity to make a meaningful difference by helping individuals overcome communication and swallowing disorders.

Interested students can explore the specific steps for becoming a speech therapist in Indiana or examine what’s involved in becoming a speech therapist in Iowa. Each state has its own requirements, including education, clinical practice, and certification processes.

For those looking at other regions, it’s important to understand the slp requirements in Kansas and the specific Kentucky slp certification requirements. Many universities now offer online graduate programs in speech-language pathology, making it more accessible for psychology students to broaden their qualifications and career prospects across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Dara R. Musher-Eizenman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles