World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7058
World Ranking
6784
National Ranking
250

Andrew D. King publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. King sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew D. King D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew D. King is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental and earth sciences, with particular emphasis on climate variability, atmospheric phenomena, and planetary changes.

The main fields of study for Andrew D. King include Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Subfields of interest cover Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Economics and Econometrics, Artificial Intelligence, and Sociology and Political Science.

Research topics addressed in their work include Climate variability and models, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Climate Change Policy and Economics, Climate Change and Health Impacts, and Hydrology and Drought Analysis.

Frequent publication venues for Andrew D. King are:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Climate
  • Earth's Future
  • Nature Climate Change

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Josephine R. Brown
  • Tilo Ziehn
  • Alexander R Borowiak
  • Luke J. Harrington
  • Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrew D. King are:

  • "The role of climate variability in Australian drought" (2020) published in Nature Climate Change
  • "Pathways and pitfalls in extreme event attribution" (2021) published in Climatic Change
  • "Observed Emergence of the Climate Change Signal: From the Familiar to the Unknown" (2020) published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Determining the Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Contribution to the Observed Intensification of Extreme Precipitation" (2020) published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises" (2020) published in Environment Systems & Decisions

Best Publications

  • Changes in extreme temperature and precipitation in the Arab region: long‐term trends and variability related to ENSO and NAO

    M. G. Donat;T. C. Peterson;M. Brunet;A. D. King

  • Australian climate extremes at 1.5 °C and 2 °C of global warming

    Andrew D. King;David J. Karoly;Benjamin J. Henley

  • Explaining Extreme Events of 2012 from a Climate Perspective

    T.C. Peterson;L.V. Alexander;M.R. Allen;J.A. Anel;J.A. Anel

  • A protocol for probabilistic extreme event attribution analyses

    Sjoukje Yvette Philip;Sarah F. Kew;Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Friederike E.L. Otto

  • Pathways and pitfalls in extreme event attribution

    Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Karin van der Wiel;Sarah Kew;Sjoukje Philip

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • The efficacy of using gridded data to examine extreme rainfall characteristics: a case study for Australia

    Andrew D. King;Lisa V. Alexander;Markus G. Donat

  • Observed emergence of the climate change signal: from the familiar to the unknown

    Ed Hawkins;David John Frame;Luke James Harrington;Luke James Harrington;Manoj Joshi

  • The Inequality of Climate Change From 1.5 to 2°C of Global Warming

    Andrew D. King;Luke J. Harrington

  • The timing of anthropogenic emergence in simulated climate extremes

    Andrew D. King;Andrew D. King;Markus G. Donat;Erich M. Fischer;Ed Hawkins

  • Climate extremes in Europe at 1.5 and 2 degrees of global warming

    Andrew D King;David J Karoly;David J Karoly

  • The role of climate variability in Australian drought

    Andrew D. King;Andrew D. King;Andy J. Pitman;Benjamin J. Henley;Benjamin J. Henley;Benjamin J. Henley;Anna M. Ukkola;Anna M. Ukkola

  • Attribution Analysis of the Ethiopian Drought of 2015

    Sjoukje Philip;Sarah F. Kew;Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Friederike Otto

  • Evolution of mean, variance and extremes in 21st century temperatures

    Sophie C. Lewis;Andrew D. King

  • Determining the Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Contribution to the Observed Intensification of Extreme Precipitation

    Seungmok Paik;Seung‐Ki Min;Seung‐Ki Min;Xuebin Zhang;Markus G. Donat

  • On the attribution of the impacts of extreme weather events to anthropogenic climate change

    Unknown

  • Extreme Rainfall Variability in Australia: Patterns, Drivers, and Predictability

    Andrew D. King;Nicholas P. Klingaman;Lisa V. Alexander;Markus G. Donat

  • Asymmetry in the response of eastern Australia extreme rainfall to low‐frequency Pacific variability

    Andrew D. King;Lisa V. Alexander;Markus G. Donat

  • Observed relationships between Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and European climate extremes

    Andrew D. King;Andrew D. King;Amy H. Butler;Martin Jucker;Nick O. Earl;Nick O. Earl

  • A multi-hazards earth science perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: the potential for concurrent and cascading crises.

    Mark C Quigley;Mark C Quigley;Januka Attanayake;Andrew King;Fabian Prideaux

  • Attributing high-impact extreme events across timescales—a case study of four different types of events

    Friederike E. L. Otto;Sjoukje Philip;Sarah Kew;Sihan Li

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Karoly
David J. Karoly Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Markus G. Donat
Markus G. Donat Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick
Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick University of New South Wales
Friederike E. L. Otto
Friederike E. L. Otto University of Oxford
Lisa V. Alexander
Lisa V. Alexander University of New South Wales
Geert Jan van Oldenborgh
Geert Jan van Oldenborgh Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
Malte Meinshausen
Malte Meinshausen University of Melbourne
Seung-Ki Min
Seung-Ki Min Pohang University of Science and Technology
Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford
Peter A. Stott
Peter A. Stott Met Office

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their qualifications alongside Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. For example, educators can consider an online eds to edd bridge program, which offers a pathway to advanced leadership roles in education with a focus on sustainability and environmental curriculum development.

Professionals looking to combine social impact with environmental issues might explore online dsw programs in social work. These programs prepare graduates to address community and social challenges linked to environmental justice and public health.

Students seeking flexibility or a strong foundational education alongside their environmental studies can benefit from most affordable online general studies degree programs. These allow learners to tailor coursework toward interdisciplinary environmental topics while managing budgets.

For those just starting or wanting to quickly augment their credentials, identifying the easiest bachelor degree to get online may provide a practical route to enter the environmental field with foundational skills and knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles