World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
20568
World Ranking
2050
National Ranking
58

Geert Jan van Oldenborgh publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert Jan van Oldenborgh sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Geert Jan van Oldenborgh D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert Jan van Oldenborgh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geert Jan van Oldenborgh was affiliated with the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focused on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with particular expertise in global and planetary change, atmospheric science, water science and technology, environmental engineering, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Their scholarly work addressed several key topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Hydrology and drought analysis
  • Flood risk assessment and management
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Hydrology and watershed management studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Van Oldenborgh co-authored frequently with a group of researchers, including Sjoukje Philip, Friederike E. L. Otto, Sarah Kew, Robert Vautard, and Maarten van Aalst.

Their publications appeared in various academic venues, with multiple works published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Climatic Change, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Environmental Research Letters, and Earth System Dynamics.

Prominent papers authored or co-authored by van Oldenborgh included:

  • "Attribution of the Australian bushfire risk to anthropogenic climate change," 2021, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
  • "Rapid attribution analysis of the extraordinary heat wave on the Pacific coast of the US and Canada in June 2021," 2022, Earth System Dynamics
  • "A protocol for probabilistic extreme event attribution analyses," 2020, Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography
  • "Pathways and pitfalls in extreme event attribution," 2021, Climatic Change
  • "Human contribution to the record-breaking June and July 2019 heatwaves in Western Europe," 2020, Environmental Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment.

    Sonia I. Seneviratne;Neville Nicholls;David Easterling;Clare M. Goodess

  • Near-term climate change: Projections and predictability

    Ben Kirtman;Scott B. Power;Akintayo John Adedoyin;George J. Boer

  • Attribution of extreme weather and climate-related events

    Peter A. Stott;Nikolaos Christidis;Friederike E. L. Otto;Ying Sun

  • UNDERSTANDING EL NINO IN OCEAN-ATMOSPHERE GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS : Progress and Challenges

    Eric Guilyardi;Andrew Wittenberg;Alexey Fedorov;Matthew Collins

  • Decadal Climate Prediction: An Update from the Trenches

    Gerald A. Meehl;Lisa Goddard;George Boer;Robert Burgman

  • KNMI Climate Explorer: A Web-Based Research Tool for High-Resolution Paleoclimatology

    Valerie Trouet;Geert Jan Van Oldenborgh

  • Important role for ocean warming and increased ice-shelf melt in Antarctic sea-ice expansion

    R. Bintanja;G. J. van Oldenborgh;S. S. Drijfhout;B. Wouters

  • El Niño in a changing climate: a multi-model study

    G. J. van Oldenborgh;S. Y. Philip;M Collins

  • Attribution of extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017

    Geert Jan Van Oldenborgh;Karin Van Der Wiel;Antonia Sebastian;Antonia Sebastian;Roop Singh

  • Attribution of the Australian bushfire risk to anthropogenic climate change

    Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Folmer Krikken;Sophie Lewis;Nicholas J. Leach

  • Projected Changes in Mean and Extreme Precipitation in Africa under Global Warming. Part I: Southern Africa

    Mxolisi E. Shongwe;G. J. Van Oldenborgh;B. J.J.M. Van Den Hurk;B. De Boer

  • Is a Decline of AMOC Causing the Warming Hole above the North Atlantic in Observed and Modeled Warming Patterns

    Sybren Drijfhout;Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Andrea Cimatoribus

  • New climate change scenarios for the Netherlands

    B. van den Hurk;A.K. Tank;G. Lenderink;A. van Ulden

  • Human influence on climate in the 2014 southern England winter floods and their impacts

    Nathalie Schaller;Alison L. Kay;Rob Lamb;Neil R. Massey

  • Estimating Changes in Global Temperature since the Preindustrial Period

    Edward D. Hawkins;Pablo Ortega;Emma Suckling;Andrew Schurer

  • Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change

    Peter Stott;Nikolaos Christidis;Friederike Otto;Ying Sun

  • Searching for decadal variations in ENSO precipitation teleconnections

    Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Gerrit Burgers

  • Scaling and trends of hourly precipitation extremes in two different climate zones – Hong Kong and the Netherlands

    G. Lenderink;H. Y. Mok;T. C. Lee;G. J. van Oldenborgh

  • A protocol for probabilistic extreme event attribution analyses

    Sjoukje Yvette Philip;Sarah F. Kew;Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Friederike E.L. Otto

  • Observed and simulated impacts of the summer NAO in Europe: implications for projected drying in the Mediterranean region

    Ileana Bladé;Brant Liebmann;Didac Fortuny;Geert Jan van Oldenborgh

  • When can we expect extremely high surface temperatures

    Andreas Sterl;Camiel Severijns;Henk Dijkstra;Wilco Hazeleger

  • Pathways and pitfalls in extreme event attribution

    Geert Jan van Oldenborgh;Karin van der Wiel;Sarah Kew;Sjoukje Philip

Frequent Co-Authors

Friederike E. L. Otto
Friederike E. L. Otto University of Oxford
Wilco Hazeleger
Wilco Hazeleger Utrecht University
Robert Vautard
Robert Vautard École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Pascal Yiou
Pascal Yiou French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Peter A. Stott
Peter A. Stott Met Office
Geert Lenderink
Geert Lenderink Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
Flavio Lehner
Flavio Lehner Cornell University
Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford
Ed Hawkins
Ed Hawkins University of Reading
Sybren Drijfhout
Sybren Drijfhout University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. For those seeking affordable options, programs like the cheapest online dsw programs provide a cost-effective route for advancing into social work roles that intersect with environmental justice and community wellness.

Additionally, pursuing an accredited affordable online general studies degree can offer flexibility for learners balancing multiple interests, including environmental policy, communication, and sustainable development.

For undergraduates seeking a smoother academic journey, some of the easiest bachelor degree programs may provide foundational knowledge that can be complemented with specialized environmental certifications or minors.

Lastly, those focused specifically on earth sciences and environmental data often find the online geoscience degree a valuable option. This degree blends geology and environmental science principles, preparing graduates for roles in environmental consulting, resource management, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Geert Jan van Oldenborgh

Recently Published Articles