World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Microbiology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 135 63 60 30 27 551 69372
Medicine 135 2067 1925 1170 1074 564 70372

Barry N. Kreiswirth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Barry N. Kreiswirth between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Barry N. Kreiswirth published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2017. 17 of the 649 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2017. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 49 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

649 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Barry N. Kreiswirth: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 3
1987 2
1988 4
1989 4
1990 2
1991 3
1992 7
1993 10
1994 6
1995 8
1996 12
1997 11
1998 10
1999 4
2000 15
2001 10
2002 15
2003 17
2004 11
2005 19
2006 17
2007 10
2008 16
2009 17
2010 15
2011 19
2012 22
2013 21
2014 22
2015 27
2016 41
2017 49
2018 36
2019 26
2020 26
2021 26
2022 28
2023 19
2024 18
2025 16
2026 1
Total 649
Download as CSV

Barry N. Kreiswirth publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry N. Kreiswirth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 545–554 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 551 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18 551
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Barry N. Kreiswirth D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry N. Kreiswirth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 127+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95 135
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Microbiology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Microbiology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Barry N. Kreiswirth is affiliated with the Center for Discovery and Innovation in the United States. Their research output spans several key fields, including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these, they have focused extensively on Molecular Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, and Pharmacology.

Their main research topics center around antibiotic resistance and infectious diseases, with specific attention to:

  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Mycobacterium Research and Diagnosis
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Bacterial Biofilms and Quorum Sensing
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Kreiswirth has authored numerous papers in leading scientific venues, frequently publishing in the following journals:

  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (19 publications)
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases (14 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (13 publications)
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (10 publications)
  • mBio (7 publications)

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Emerging Antimicrobial-Resistant High-Risk Klebsiella pneumoniae Clones ST307 and ST147, 2020, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
  • Molecular and clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the USA (CRACKLE-2): a prospective cohort study, 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Global epidemiology and clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and associated carbapenemases (POP): a prospective cohort study, 2023, The Lancet Microbe
  • Emergence of Multiple SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Escape Variants in an Immunocompromised Host Undergoing Convalescent Plasma Treatment, 2021, mSphere
  • CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Carbapenemase Gene and Plasmid Curing in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2020, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Kreiswirth collaborates regularly with several researchers, including Liang Chen, Robert A. Bonomo, David van Duin, José R. Mediavilla, and Khalid M Dousa. These frequent coauthors have worked closely on topics related to antimicrobial resistance and infectious diseases.

Best Publications

  • Proposal for Standardization of Optimized Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit-Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Philip Supply;Philip Supply;Caroline Allix;Sarah Lesjean;Sarah Lesjean;Mara Cardoso-Oelemann;Mara Cardoso-Oelemann

  • Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    Frank R DeLeo;Michael Otto;Barry N Kreiswirth;Henry F Chambers

  • The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage

    Barry N. Kreiswirth;Sven Löfdahl;Marsha J. Betley;Mary O'Reilly

  • Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule.

    R P Novick;H F Ross;S J Projan;J Kornblum

  • Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination

    Srinand Sreevatsan;Xi Pan;Kathryn E. Stockbauer;Nancy D. Connell

  • Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions.

    Yoko Kondo;Teruyo Ito;Xiao Xue Ma;Shinya Watanabe

  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology

    Karine Brudey;Jeffrey R Driscoll;Leen Rigouts;Wolfgang M Prodinger

  • A small-molecule nitroimidazopyran drug candidate for the treatment of tuberculosis.

    C. Kendall Stover;Paul Warrener;Donald R. VanDevanter;David R. Sherman

  • Tackling antibiotic resistance

    Karen Bush;Patrice Courvalin;Gautam Dantas;Julian Davies

  • Evaluation of Protein A Gene Polymorphic Region DNA Sequencing for Typing of Staphylococcus aureus Strains

    B. Shopsin;B. Shopsin;M. Gomez;S. O. Montgomery;D. H. Smith

  • A glycolipid of hypervirulent tuberculosis strains that inhibits the innate immune response

    Michael B. Reed;Pilar Domenech;Claudia Manca;Hua Su

  • Role of External Bacterial Flora in the Pathogenesis of Acute Postoperative Endophthalmitis

    Mark G. Speaker;Florence A. Milch;Mahendra K. Shah;William Eisner

  • Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) : guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements.

    T. Ito;K. Hiramatsu;D. Oliviera;H. de Lencastre

  • Regulation of exoprotein gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus by agr

    P. Recsei;B. Kreiswirth;M. O'Reilly;P. Schlievert

  • Is Panton‐Valentine Leukocidin the Major Virulence Determinant in Community‐Associated Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Disease?

    Jovanka M. Voyich;Michael Otto;Barun Mathema;Kevin R. Braughton

  • Insights into Mechanisms Used by Staphylococcus aureus to Avoid Destruction by Human Neutrophils

    Jovanka M. Voyich;Kevin R. Braughton;Daniel E. Sturdevant;Adeline R. Whitney

  • Global dissemination of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis W-Beijing family strains

    Pablo J. Bifani;Barun Mathema;Natalia E. Kurepina;Barry N. Kreiswirth

  • Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations.

    H. E. Takiff;L. Salazar;C. Guerrero;W. Philipp

  • Cloning, characterization, and sequencing of an accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus.

    Hwei-Ling Peng;R. P. Novick;B. Kreiswirth;J. Kornblum

  • spa Typing Method for Discriminating among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates: Implications for Use of A Single Marker to Detect Genetic Micro- and Macrovariation

    Larry Koreen;Srinivas V. Ramaswamy;Edward A. Graviss;Steven Naidich

Frequent Co-Authors

Liang Chen
Liang Chen Hackensack Meridian Health Center for Discovery and Innovation
Robert A. Bonomo
Robert A. Bonomo Case Western Reserve University
Barun Mathema
Barun Mathema Columbia University
Michael R. Jacobs
Michael R. Jacobs University Hospitals of Cleveland
James M. Musser
James M. Musser Houston Methodist
Michael J. Satlin
Michael J. Satlin Cornell University
Kristine M. Hujer
Kristine M. Hujer Case Western Reserve University
Frank R. DeLeo
Frank R. DeLeo National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Cornelius J. Clancy
Cornelius J. Clancy University of Pittsburgh
Federico Perez
Federico Perez Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that often require specialized education beyond a traditional degree. For those interested in healthcare, becoming a Functional Medicine Nurse Practitioner is an emerging field, with various functional medicine nurse practitioner programs available online. These programs blend microbiology fundamentals with holistic patient care approaches.

Career transitions and second chances are also important considerations. For individuals concerned about criminal records, exploring options such as what can a felon go to college for helps identify degree programs that support reentry and growth, including in health sciences and coding.

Professionals in the medical billing and coding industry often benefit from certifications like the CPC. If you’re curious about career prospects, insights into cpc salary and pathways can guide decisions on pursuing this lucrative and in-demand field, which sometimes overlaps with lab and clinical support roles.

For those seeking more interpersonal and patient-focused roles, becoming a Child Life Specialist is a rewarding option. Understanding how much do child life specialists make can help set expectations for this profession, which often requires knowledge of both psychological and biological sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Barry N. Kreiswirth

Trending Scientists