World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William E. Pinchak

William E. Pinchak

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
31
Citations
3538
World Ranking
2296
National Ranking
652

William E. Pinchak publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Pinchak sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 108 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

William E. Pinchak D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Pinchak sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Pinchak is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these fields, they have focused on subfields including Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, and Cell Biology.

Their main research topics encompass Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology, Meat and Animal Product Quality, and Muscle metabolism and nutrition. These areas highlight a specialized focus on the biological and physiological aspects of animal science in agricultural contexts.

William E. Pinchak has contributed to knowledge dissemination through peer-reviewed publications. One recent paper authored with Aaron B Norris, published in 2020, is titled Effect of quebracho condensed tannin extract on fecal gas flux in steers. This work appeared in the Journal of Environmental Quality.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Aaron B Norris, Luís O Tedeschi, James P. Muir, Jamie L. Foster, and Kenneth D. Casey. Collaboration appears balanced among these coauthors, each contributing to at least one joint publication.

The Journal of Environmental Quality is a noted venue where William E. Pinchak's work has appeared, representing their engagement with environmental and agricultural quality research communities.

Best Publications

  • Rumen Bacterial Diversity Dynamics Associated with Changing from Bermudagrass Hay to Grazed Winter Wheat Diets

    Dipti W. Pitta;William E. Pinchak;Scott E. Dowd;Jason Osterstock

  • Effects of dietary tannin source on performance, feed efficiency, ruminal fermentation, and carcass and non-carcass traits in steers fed a high-grain diet

    W.K. Krueger;H. Gutierrez-Bañuelos;G.E. Carstens;B.R. Min

  • Comparative antimicrobial activity of tannin extracts from perennial plants on mastitis pathogens

    W. E. Pinchak;R. Merkel;S. Walker;G. Tomita

  • Effects of condensed tannins supplementation level on weight gain and in vitro and in vivo bloat precursors in steers grazing winter wheat.

    B. R. Min;W. E. Pinchak;R. C. Anderson;J. D. Fulford

  • Beef cattle distribution patterns on foothill range.

    W.E. Pinchak;M.A. Smith;R.H. Hart;J.W. Waggoner

  • Insights on Alterations to the Rumen Ecosystem by Nitrate and Nitrocompounds

    Elizabeth A. Latham;Robin C. Anderson;William E. Pinchak;David J. Nisbet

  • Validation of a system for monitoring feeding behavior in beef cattle.

    E. D. M. Mendes;G. E. Carstens;L. O. Tedeschi;W. E. Pinchak

  • Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbiome of steers with wheat-induced frothy bloat.

    D. W. Pitta;W. E. Pinchak;N. Indugu;B. Vecchiarelli

  • Wheat pasture bloat dynamics, in vitro ruminal gas production, and potential bloat mitigation with condensed tannins.

    B R Min;W E Pinchak;J D Fulford;R Puchala

  • Interrelationships of forage and steer growth dynamics on wheat pasture.

    W.E. Pinchak;W.D. Worrall;S.P. Caldwell;L.J. Hunt

  • Obligatory Summer-Dormant Cool-Season Perennial Grasses for Semiarid Environments of the Southern Great Plains

    D. P. Malinowski;H. Zuo;B. A. Kramp;J. P. Muir

  • Effect of Tannins on the In Vitro Growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and In Vivo Growth of Generic Escherichia coli Excreted from Steers

    Byeng R. Min;William E. Pinchak;Robin C. Anderson;Todd R. Callaway

  • Seasonal dynamics of minerals in forages at the Texas Experimental Ranch.

    L.W. Greene;W.E. Pinchak;R.K. Heitschmidt

  • Long-term grass yields following chemical control of honey mesquite

    R.J. Ansley;W.E. Pinchak;W.R. Teague;B.A. Kramp

  • Effect of feed additives on in vitro and in vivo rumen characteristics and frothy bloat dynamics in steers grazing wheat pasture

    Byeng R. Min;William E. Pinchak;Jerry D. Fulford;Richard Puchala

  • Cow/calf production and economic returns from yearlong continuous, deferred rotation and rotational grazing treatments

    R. K. Heitschmidt;J. R. Conner;S. K. Canon;W. E. Pinchak

  • Morbidity effects on productivity and profitability of stocker cattle grazing in the Southern Plains.

    W. E. Pinchak;D. R. Tolleson;M. McCloy;L. J. Hunt

  • Longitudinal shifts in bacterial diversity and fermentation pattern in the rumen of steers grazing wheat pasture

    D.W. Pitta;D.W. Pitta;W.E. Pinchak;S. Dowd;K. Dorton

  • Influence of short-term dietary starch inclusion on the equine cecal microbiome.

    C M Warzecha;J A Coverdale;J E Janecka;J L Leatherwood

  • Effect of increasing amounts of postextraction algal residue on straw utilization in steers.

    M. L. Drewery;J. E. Sawyer;W. E. Pinchak;T. A. Wickersham

  • Bactericidal effect of hydrolysable and condensed tannin extracts on Campylobacter jejuni in vitro.

    Robin C. Anderson;Maša Vodovnik;Byeng R. Min;William E. Pinchak

  • Consumption and dispersion of mesquite seeds by ruminants.

    Charles L. Kneuper;Cody B. Scott;William E. Pinchak

  • An ecological economic simulation model for assessing fire and grazing management effects on mesquite rangelands in Texas

    W.R. Teague;W.R. Teague;W.E. Grant;U.P. Kreuter;H. Diaz-Solis

  • In vitro bacterial growth and in vivo ruminal microbiota populations associated with bloat in steers grazing wheat forage

    B. R. Min;W. E. Pinchak;R. C. Anderson;M. E. Hume

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin C. Anderson
Robin C. Anderson United States Department of Agriculture
Gordon E. Carstens
Gordon E. Carstens Texas A&M University
Tryon A Wickersham
Tryon A Wickersham Texas A&M University
Luis O. Tedeschi
Luis O. Tedeschi Texas A&M University
James P. Muir
James P. Muir Texas A&M University
David J. Nisbet
David J. Nisbet United States Department of Agriculture
Todd R. Callaway
Todd R. Callaway University of Georgia
Jaime Kigel
Jaime Kigel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Roger B. Harvey
Roger B. Harvey United States Department of Agriculture
L. W. Greene
L. W. Greene Auburn University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Animal Science and Veterinary fields opens many doors, but often students consider complementary career paths that also impact animal and human wellbeing. For those interested in behavioral health, exploring programs like bacb accredited schools can provide certification options in behavior analysis, relevant for animal training or therapy roles.

Similarly, understanding psychological principles is valuable in veterinary care and animal behavior. Students might find value in nasp accredited online school psychology programs, which prepare graduates to support youth and families, skills transferable to human-animal interaction contexts.

For those considering mental health professions that complement veterinary care, enrolling in apa accredited psyd programs offers paths to clinical psychology without GRE hurdles, accessible alongside animal science careers.

Finally, issues like substance abuse can impact pet owners and communities served by veterinary professionals. Learning how to become a drug counselor online can enhance one’s ability to provide holistic support to clients and stakeholders, broadening career opportunities beyond traditional animal science roles.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Pinchak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles