World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
11053
World Ranking
4351
National Ranking
266

Anthony Hunter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Hunter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 261 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anthony Hunter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Hunter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony Hunter is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions primarily fall within the discipline of Computer Science, with a strong focus on Artificial Intelligence. They have published extensively in related subfields, including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Information Systems, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

Their work spans several main research topics, notably:

  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Hunter has contributed to a number of recent academic papers. Key publications include:

  • "Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments," 2020, Artificial Intelligence
  • "Strategic argumentation dialogues for persuasion: Framework and experiments based on modelling the beliefs and concerns of the persuadee," 2022, Argument & Computation
  • "Semantic inconsistency measures using 3-valued logics," 2023, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
  • "Machine Learning for Utility Prediction in Argument-Based Computational Persuasion," 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules," 2022, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

Hunter frequently collaborates with other researchers. Some of the notable coauthors include:

  • Antonis Bikakis
  • Ivan Donadello
  • Mauro Dragoni
  • Aïssatou Diallo
  • Luke Dickens

The scientist's work has been published in several recurring venues, reflecting the focus and dissemination of their research. These publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Elements of argumentation

    Anthony Hunter

  • Inconsistency handling in multiperspective specifications

    A.C.W. Finkelstein;D. Gabbay;A. Hunter;J. Kramer

  • A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

    Philippe Besnard;Anthony Hunter

  • Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results

    Paul E. Dunne;Anthony Hunter;Peter McBurney;Simon Parsons

  • Measuring inconsistency in knowledgebases

    John Grant;Anthony Hunter

  • Managing inconsistent specifications: reasoning, analysis, and action

    Anthony Hunter;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments

    Anthony Hunter

  • An Argument-Based Approach to Using Multiple Ontologies

    Elizabeth Black;Anthony Hunter;Jeff Z. Pan

  • Paraconsistent logics

    Anthony Hunter

  • Fusion: General concepts and characteristics

    Isabelle Bloch;Anthony A. Hunter;Alain A. Appriou;Andr A. Ayoun

  • Towards Artificial Argumentation.

    Katie Atkinson;Pietro Baroni;Massimiliano Giacomin;Anthony Hunter

  • Measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets

    Anthony Hunter;Sébastien Konieczny

  • Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties

    Nikos Gorogiannis;Anthony Hunter

  • On the measure of conflicts: Shapley Inconsistency Values

    Anthony Hunter;Sébastien Konieczny

  • Making inconsistency respectable: A logical framework for inconsistency in reasoning, part I — A position paper

    Dov Gabbay;Anthony Hunter

  • Introduction to structured argumentation

    Philippe Besnard;Alejandro Javier García;Anthony Hunter;Sanjay Modgil

  • Approaches to measuring inconsistent information

    Anthony Hunter;Sébastien Konieczny

  • An inquiry dialogue system

    Elizabeth Black;Anthony Hunter

  • Inconsistency Tolerance

    Leopoldo Bertossi;Anthony Hunter;Torsten Schaub

  • Performing meta-analysis with incomplete statistical information in clinical trials

    Jianbing Ma;Weiru Liu;Anthony Hunter;Weiya Zhang

  • Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems: volume 2: reasoning with actual and potential contradictions

    Philippe Besnard;Anthony Hunter;Dov M. Gabbay;Philippe Smets

  • Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications

    A Finkelstein;D Gabbay;A Hunter;J Kramer

Frequent Co-Authors

Dov M. Gabbay
Dov M. Gabbay University of Luxembourg
Simon Parsons
Simon Parsons University of Lincoln
Henry W. W. Potts
Henry W. W. Potts University College London
Michael Wooldridge
Michael Wooldridge University of Oxford
Bashar Nuseibeh
Bashar Nuseibeh The Open University
Torsten Schaub
Torsten Schaub University of Potsdam
Leopoldo Bertossi
Leopoldo Bertossi Carleton University
Francesca Toni
Francesca Toni Imperial College London
Leila Amgoud
Leila Amgoud Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees gives students greater flexibility and a wider range of career options within computer science and related fields. For those seeking to enter the job market quickly, an online associate degree can be earned in as little as six months, offering basic technical skills and foundational knowledge.

If you're cost-conscious, there are many options for the cheapest online college bachelor degree programs covering technology and computer science disciplines. These programs are designed to be accessible without sacrificing academic quality.

For business-minded students interested in leveraging tech skills within the corporate world, an affordable online business degree offers coursework in management, analytics, and entrepreneurship, all from a flexible online platform.

Engineering is closely related to computer science and can open doors in software, hardware, and systems design. Programs specializing in this field are accessible through an engineering online degree, making advanced technical education more attainable and budget-friendly.

Each of these online pathways provides unique opportunities to build your skill set, enhance your resume, and launch a dynamic career in technology-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Hunter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles