World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
17202
World Ranking
1958
National Ranking
936

Frank Gilliam publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Gilliam sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 193 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Frank Gilliam D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Gilliam sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Gilliam is a researcher affiliated with The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on epilepsy research and treatment as well as related neurological and pharmacological topics.

Their research spans multiple subfields, including psychiatry and mental health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, cognitive neuroscience, and molecular biology. The topics frequently covered in their publications involve epilepsy research and treatment, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, pharmacological receptor mechanisms and effects, fetal and pediatric neurological disorders, and cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Frank Gilliam include:

  • Serotonergic therapy in epilepsy, 2021, Current Opinion in Neurology
  • Case Report: PAFAH1B1 Mutation and Posterior Band Heterotopia With Focal Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Treated by Responsive Neurostimulation, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology

Frequent co-authors in Gilliam's publications include Hrvoje Hečimović, Matthew S. Gentry, Zvonimir Popović, Paddy Ssentongo, and Michael D. Sather.

Gilliam's work has appeared in various scientific journals, reflecting a range of interests and interdisciplinary collaboration. Prominent publication venues are:

  • Current Opinion in Neurology
  • Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia

Best Publications

  • Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs

    Piero Perucca;Frank G Gilliam

  • Rapid detection of major depression in epilepsy: a multicentre study

    Frank G Gilliam;John J Barry;Bruce P Hermann;Kimford J Meador

  • Cognitive effects of topiramate, gabapentin, and lamotrigine in healthy young adults

    R. Martin;R. Kuzniecky;S. Ho;H. Hetherington

  • Rates and risk factors for suicide, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts in chronic epilepsy

    Jana E Jones;Bruce P Hermann;John J Barry;Frank G Gilliam

  • Patient‐Validated Content of Epilepsy‐Specific Quality‐of‐Life Measurement

    Frank Gilliam;Ruben Kuzniecky;Edward Faught;Lorie Black

  • Optimizing health outcomes in active epilepsy.

    Frank Gilliam

  • Systematic screening allows reduction of adverse antiepileptic drug effects: A randomized trial

    Frank G. Gilliam;A. J. Fessler;G. Baker;V. Vahle

  • Depression and epilepsy: Epidemiologic and neurobiologic perspectives that may explain their high comorbid occurrence

    Andres M. Kanner;Steven C. Schachter;John J. Barry;Dale C. Hersdorffer

  • Intrinsic epileptogenesis of hypothalamic hamartomas in gelastic epilepsy

    Ruben Kuzniecky;Barthon Guthrie;James Mountz;Martina Bebin

  • Epidemiological and medical aspects of epilepsy in the elderly.

    James C Cloyd;W. Hauser;A. Towne;R. Ramsay

  • Improved health care resource utilization following video-eeg-confirmed diagnosis of nonepileptic psychogenic seizures

    Roy C. Martin;Frank G. Gilliam;Meridith Kilgore;Edward Faught

  • Clinical assessment of Axis I psychiatric morbidity in chronic epilepsy: a multicenter investigation.

    Jana E. Jones;Bruce P. Hermann;John J. Barry;Frank Gilliam

  • Depression in epilepsy: ignoring clinical expression of neuronal network dysfunction?

    Frank G Gilliam;Juan Santos;Victoria Vahle;Jewell Carter

  • Psychiatric comorbidity, health, and function in epilepsy.

    Frank Gilliam;Hrvoje Hecimovic;Yvette Sheline

  • Adverse antiepileptic drug effects : Toward a clinically and neurobiologically relevant taxonomy

    Piero Perucca;Jewell Carter;Victoria Vahle;Frank G. Gilliam

  • Normalization of contralateral metabolic function following temporal lobectomy demonstrated by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging

    James W. Hugg;Ruben I. Kuzniecky;Frank G. Gilliam;R. Edward Faught

  • Consensus statement: the evaluation and treatment of people with epilepsy and affective disorders.

    John J. Barry;Alan B. Ettinger;Peggy Friel;Frank G. Gilliam

  • Prevalence of self-reported epilepsy or seizure disorder and its associations with self-reported depression and anxiety: results from the 2004 HealthStyles Survey.

    Rosemarie Kobau;Frank Gilliam;David J. Thurman

  • Screening for Major Depression in Epilepsy with Common Self-report Depression Inventories

    Jana E. Jones;Bruce P. Hermann;John L. Woodard;John J. Barry

  • Modulation of cerebral GABA by topiramate, lamotrigine, and gabapentin in healthy adults

    Ruben Kuzniecky;S Ho;J Pan;R Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruben Kuzniecky
Ruben Kuzniecky Hofstra University
Roy C. Martin
Roy C. Martin University of Alabama at Birmingham
Edward Faught
Edward Faught Emory University
Kimford J. Meador
Kimford J. Meador Stanford University
Andres M. Kanner
Andres M. Kanner University of Miami
Bruce P. Hermann
Bruce P. Hermann University of Wisconsin–Madison
Philippe Ryvlin
Philippe Ryvlin University Hospital of Lausanne
Piero Perucca
Piero Perucca University of Melbourne
Robert C. Knowlton
Robert C. Knowlton University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey G. Ojemann
Jeffrey G. Ojemann University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frank Gilliam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles