World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
7944
World Ranking
10558
National Ranking
528

Hartmut Schmeck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartmut Schmeck sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 288 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hartmut Schmeck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartmut Schmeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Hartmut Schmeck is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on various branches within engineering, especially electrical and electronic engineering, control and systems engineering, and building and construction. Their work also touches on hardware and architecture as well as renewable energy, sustainability, and environmental concerns.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting
  • Energy Efficiency and Management
  • Power Line Communications and Noise

Schmeck has published extensively in a range of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Applied Sciences
  • Energies
  • Energy Informatics

Among recent scholarly papers are:

  • "State-of-the-Art Integration of Decentralized Energy Management Systems into the German Smart Meter Gateway Infrastructure" (2020, Applied Sciences)
  • "Strategies for an Adaptive Control System to Improve Power Grid Resilience with Smart Buildings" (2021, Energies)
  • "Energy informatics" (2022, Communications of the ACM)
  • "Adequacy of neural networks for wide-scale day-ahead load forecasts on buildings and distribution systems using smart meter data" (2020, Energy Informatics)
  • "Automated generation of models for demand side flexibility using machine learning" (2021, ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review)

Co-authors working frequently with Schmeck include Kevin Förderer, Veit Hagenmeyer, David Wölfle, Tobias Riedel, and Manuel Lösch.

In their career, Schmeck has been recognized as an ACM Senior Member since 2013. Their research contributions span crucial areas of smart grid technology, control systems, and energy management, reflecting a broad engagement with advancements in engineering disciplines relevant to energy informatics and sustainability.

Best Publications

  • Ant colony optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling

    D. Merkle;M. Middendorf;H. Schmeck

  • A Multi-population Approach to Dynamic Optimization Problems

    Jürgen Branke;Thomas Kaussler;Christian Smidt;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Guidance in evolutionary multi-objective optimization

    J Branke;T Kaußler;H Schmeck

  • Designing evolutionary algorithms for dynamic optimization problems

    Jürgen Branke;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Multi Colony Ant Algorithms

    Martin Middendorf;Frank Reischle;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Organic computing - a new vision for distributed embedded systems

    H. Schmeck

  • Organic Computing - A Paradigm Shift for Complex Systems

    Christian Mller-Schloer;Hartmut Schmeck;Theo Ungerer

  • Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

    Jürgen Branke;Benedikt Scheckenbach;Michael Stein;Kalyan Deb

  • Towards a generic observer/controller architecture for Organic Computing.

    Urban Richter;Moez Mnif;Jürgen Branke;Christian Müller-Schloer

  • Adaptivity and self-organization in organic computing systems

    Hartmut Schmeck;Christian Müller-Schloer;Emre Çakar;Moez Mnif

  • Modeling and Valuation of Residential Demand Flexibility for Renewable Energy Integration

    Sebastian Gottwalt;Johannes Garttner;Hartmut Schmeck;Christof Weinhardt

  • Dynamic scheduling of tasks on partially reconfigurable FPGAs

    O. Diessel;H. ElGindy;M. Middendorf;H. Schmeck

  • An Ant Colony Optimization approach to dynamic TSP

    Michael Guntsch;Martin Middendorf;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Observation and Control of Organic Systems

    Sven Tomforde;Holger Prothmann;Jürgen Branke;Jörg Hähner

  • Experiences with fine‐grainedparallel genetic algorithms

    Udo Kohlmorgen;Hartmut Schmeck;K. Haase

  • Efficient fitness estimation in noisy environments

    Jürgen Branke;Christian Schmidt;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Organic Computing Addressing Complexity by Controlled Self-Organization

    Jürgen Branke;Moez Mnif;Christian Müller-Schloer;Holger Prothmann

  • Parallelizing multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: cone separation

    J. Branke;H. Schmeck;K. Deb

  • Multi-objective particle swarm optimization on computer grids

    Sanaz Mostaghim;Juergen Branke;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Information Exchange in Multi Colony Ant Algorithms

    Martin Middendorf;Frank Reischle;Hartmut Schmeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanaz Mostaghim
Sanaz Mostaghim Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Jürgen Branke
Jürgen Branke University of Warwick
Martin Middendorf
Martin Middendorf Leipzig University
Christof Weinhardt
Christof Weinhardt Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Wolf Fichtner
Wolf Fichtner Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Hans-Arno Jacobsen
Hans-Arno Jacobsen University of Toronto
Lars Wolf
Lars Wolf Technische Universität Braunschweig
Wolfgang Rosenstiel
Wolfgang Rosenstiel University of Tübingen
Dirk Neumann
Dirk Neumann University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens a world of flexible education and career options. Many students now start their journeys with an associate degree online, which serves as both a foundation for advanced study and a quick route to entry-level positions in tech.

For those seeking faster advancement, there are shortest master degree programs available. These condensed options allow students to boost their qualifications in a fraction of the usual time, helping them remain competitive in a fast-evolving job market.

When considering further study, it’s crucial to choose graduate degrees that are worth it. Demand for tech professionals is high, but certain master’s programs offer stronger returns on investment and open doors to leadership roles or specialized fields in computer science.

Certifications also matter. High-value certifications for jobs can help you demonstrate expertise in specific technologies or tools, often leading to better pay and expanded career opportunities—sometimes without the need for a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Hartmut Schmeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles