World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 37 10558 10260 528 515 288 7944

Hartmut Schmeck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hartmut Schmeck between 1951 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hartmut Schmeck published across 75 years, from 1951 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 76 publications in 2016. 6 of the 618 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 76. Peak 76 publications in 2016. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 45 publications 2011: 49 publications 2012: 42 publications 2013: 56 publications 2014: 47 publications 2015: 51 publications 2016: 76 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1951 2025

618 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hartmut Schmeck: publications per year, 1951 to 2025
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 0
1986 3
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 3
1996 2
1997 0
1998 2
1999 2
2000 8
2001 3
2002 24
2003 11
2004 11
2005 11
2006 14
2007 18
2008 32
2009 27
2010 45
2011 49
2012 42
2013 56
2014 47
2015 51
2016 76
2017 26
2018 18
2019 5
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 3
2025 3
Total 618
Download as CSV

Hartmut Schmeck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartmut Schmeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 288 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 288
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Hartmut Schmeck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartmut Schmeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 37
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Hartmut Schmeck is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on various branches within engineering, especially electrical and electronic engineering, control and systems engineering, and building and construction. Their work also touches on hardware and architecture as well as renewable energy, sustainability, and environmental concerns.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting
  • Energy Efficiency and Management
  • Power Line Communications and Noise

Schmeck has published extensively in a range of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Applied Sciences
  • Energies
  • Energy Informatics

Among recent scholarly papers are:

  • "State-of-the-Art Integration of Decentralized Energy Management Systems into the German Smart Meter Gateway Infrastructure" (2020, Applied Sciences)
  • "Strategies for an Adaptive Control System to Improve Power Grid Resilience with Smart Buildings" (2021, Energies)
  • "Energy informatics" (2022, Communications of the ACM)
  • "Adequacy of neural networks for wide-scale day-ahead load forecasts on buildings and distribution systems using smart meter data" (2020, Energy Informatics)
  • "Automated generation of models for demand side flexibility using machine learning" (2021, ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review)

Co-authors working frequently with Schmeck include Kevin Förderer, Veit Hagenmeyer, David Wölfle, Tobias Riedel, and Manuel Lösch.

In their career, Schmeck has been recognized as an ACM Senior Member since 2013. Their research contributions span crucial areas of smart grid technology, control systems, and energy management, reflecting a broad engagement with advancements in engineering disciplines relevant to energy informatics and sustainability.

Best Publications

  • Ant colony optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling

    D. Merkle;M. Middendorf;H. Schmeck

  • A Multi-population Approach to Dynamic Optimization Problems

    Jürgen Branke;Thomas Kaussler;Christian Smidt;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Guidance in evolutionary multi-objective optimization

    J Branke;T Kaußler;H Schmeck

  • Designing evolutionary algorithms for dynamic optimization problems

    Jürgen Branke;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Multi Colony Ant Algorithms

    Martin Middendorf;Frank Reischle;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Organic computing - a new vision for distributed embedded systems

    H. Schmeck

  • Organic Computing - A Paradigm Shift for Complex Systems

    Christian Mller-Schloer;Hartmut Schmeck;Theo Ungerer

  • Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

    Jürgen Branke;Benedikt Scheckenbach;Michael Stein;Kalyan Deb

  • Towards a generic observer/controller architecture for Organic Computing.

    Urban Richter;Moez Mnif;Jürgen Branke;Christian Müller-Schloer

  • Adaptivity and self-organization in organic computing systems

    Hartmut Schmeck;Christian Müller-Schloer;Emre Çakar;Moez Mnif

  • Modeling and Valuation of Residential Demand Flexibility for Renewable Energy Integration

    Sebastian Gottwalt;Johannes Garttner;Hartmut Schmeck;Christof Weinhardt

  • Dynamic scheduling of tasks on partially reconfigurable FPGAs

    O. Diessel;H. ElGindy;M. Middendorf;H. Schmeck

  • An Ant Colony Optimization approach to dynamic TSP

    Michael Guntsch;Martin Middendorf;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Observation and Control of Organic Systems

    Sven Tomforde;Holger Prothmann;Jürgen Branke;Jörg Hähner

  • Experiences with fine‐grainedparallel genetic algorithms

    Udo Kohlmorgen;Hartmut Schmeck;K. Haase

  • Efficient fitness estimation in noisy environments

    Jürgen Branke;Christian Schmidt;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Organic Computing Addressing Complexity by Controlled Self-Organization

    Jürgen Branke;Moez Mnif;Christian Müller-Schloer;Holger Prothmann

  • Parallelizing multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: cone separation

    J. Branke;H. Schmeck;K. Deb

  • Multi-objective particle swarm optimization on computer grids

    Sanaz Mostaghim;Juergen Branke;Hartmut Schmeck

  • Information Exchange in Multi Colony Ant Algorithms

    Martin Middendorf;Frank Reischle;Hartmut Schmeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanaz Mostaghim
Sanaz Mostaghim Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Jürgen Branke
Jürgen Branke University of Warwick
Martin Middendorf
Martin Middendorf Leipzig University
Christof Weinhardt
Christof Weinhardt Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Wolf Fichtner
Wolf Fichtner Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Hans-Arno Jacobsen
Hans-Arno Jacobsen University of Toronto
Lars Wolf
Lars Wolf Technische Universität Braunschweig
Wolfgang Rosenstiel
Wolfgang Rosenstiel University of Tübingen
Dirk Neumann
Dirk Neumann University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens a world of flexible education and career options. Many students now start their journeys with an associate degree online, which serves as both a foundation for advanced study and a quick route to entry-level positions in tech.

For those seeking faster advancement, there are shortest master degree programs available. These condensed options allow students to boost their qualifications in a fraction of the usual time, helping them remain competitive in a fast-evolving job market.

When considering further study, it’s crucial to choose graduate degrees that are worth it. Demand for tech professionals is high, but certain master’s programs offer stronger returns on investment and open doors to leadership roles or specialized fields in computer science.

Certifications also matter. High-value certifications for jobs can help you demonstrate expertise in specific technologies or tools, often leading to better pay and expanded career opportunities—sometimes without the need for a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Hartmut Schmeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles