World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
3615
World Ranking
10303
National Ranking
1012

Tim Pring publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Pring sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tim Pring D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Pring sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim Pring is a researcher affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a focus on several related subfields including Epidemiology, Occupational Therapy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research topics cover a range of areas notably Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, Spinal Cord Injury Research, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Voice and Speech Disorders, and Dysphagia Assessment and Management.

Tim Pring has contributed to multiple academic papers, published in journals such as Aphasiology, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, and the British Journal of Surgery. Selected recent works include:

  • Measuring outcomes of a peer-led social communication skills intervention for adults with acquired brain injury: A pilot investigation (2020, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation)
  • Measuring group social interactions following acquired brain injury: an inter-rater reliability evaluation (2020, Aphasiology)
  • Amateur choir singers - Does good vocal health matter? (2023, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders)
  • 1141 Mortality and Re-Amputation Rates Following Below Knee Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024, British Journal of Surgery)
  • An examination of sample length and reliability of the Interactional Network Tool, a new measure of group interactions in acquired brain injury (2022, Aphasiology)

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Susan Howell, Suzanne Beeke, Rosemary Varley, Emma Louise Sinnott, and Jo Levett. This indicates a collaborative engagement in research within their specialized domains.

Best Publications

  • Children with phonological problems: a survey of clinical practice

    Victoria Joffe;T. Pring

  • The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retrieval in aphasic patients

    J. Marshall;C. Pound;M. White-thomson;T. Pring

  • Verb Retrieval and Sentence Production in Aphasia

    Jane Marshall;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat

  • Calling a salad a federation: An investigation of semantic jargon. Part 1—nouns

    Jane Marshall;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat;Jo Robson

  • Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners

    Dollen Tabri;Kim Michelle Smith Abou Chacra;Tim Pring

  • Speech therapy and Parkinson's disease: a review and further data.

    J. A. Johnson;T. R. Pring

  • Delivering the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) by web camera: a feasibility study

    Susan Howell;Elina Tripoliti;Tim Pring

  • Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials.

    Tim Pring

  • Why does monitoring fail in jargon aphasia? comprehension, judgment, and therapy evidence.

    Jane Marshall;Jo Robson;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat

  • Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process

    Julia Galliers;Stephanie Wilson;Abi Roper;Naomi Cocks

  • Pitch change in male-to-female transsexuals: has phonosurgery a role to play?

    M Brown;A Perry;A D Cheesman;T Pring

  • Feeding difficulties in children with cerebral palsy: low‐cost caregiver training in Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Unknown

  • Treating children with expressive phonological disorders: does phonological awareness therapy work in the clinic?

    M. Denne;N. Langdown;T. Pring;P. Roy

  • Sentence processing therapy: Working at the level of the event

    J. Marshall;T. Pring;S. Chiat

  • Therapy for word-finding deficits: More on the effects of semantic and phonological approaches to treatment with dysphasic patients

    A. Davis;T. Pring

  • The Boston Naming Test in Greek: Normative data and the effects of age and education on naming

    Aggeliki Patricacou;Eirini Psallida;Tim Pring;Lucy Dipper

  • Phonological naming therapy in jargon aphasia: positive but paradoxical effects.

    Jo Robson;Jane Marshall;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat

  • An impairment in processing verbs' thematic roles: A therapy study

    Jane Marshall;Shula Chiat;Tim Pring

  • Gesture and Naming Therapy for People with Severe Aphasia: A Group Study.

    Jane Marshall;Wendy Best;Naomi Cocks;Madeline Cruice

  • Treating children with phonological problems: does an eclectic approach to therapy work?

    Gwen Lancaster;Susanna Keusch;Abigail Levin;Tim Pring

  • Written communication in undifferentiated jargon aphasia : a therapy study

    Jo Robson;Tim Pring;Jane Marshall;Sarah Morrison

  • Evaluating the effects of speech therapy for aphasics: developing the single case methodology.

    T. R. Pring

  • Picture/word matching tasks and word retrieval: Some follow-up data and second thoughts

    T. Pring;M. White-thomson;C. Pound;J. Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Marshall
Jane Marshall City, University of London
Shula Chiat
Shula Chiat City, University of London
Katerina Hilari
Katerina Hilari City, University of London
Barbara Dodd
Barbara Dodd University of Queensland
Patricia Limousin
Patricia Limousin University College London
Marwan Hariz
Marwan Hariz Umeå University
Lawrence Hunter
Lawrence Hunter University of Colorado Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA can open up a variety of accessible career pathways, from counseling and social work to organizational psychology and research. As more students seek remote learning opportunities, finding affordable programs is increasingly important.

Prospective students should carefully compare tuition rates, course quality, and program flexibility. For those on a budget, researching the cheapest psychology programs in Louisville can reveal great options to start your educational journey. Similarly, students in the Midwest can look into the most affordable psychology degree programs in Minneapolis for value-driven choices in urban settings.

For learners searching in the central US, exploring the most affordable psychology degree programs in Missouri ensures access to respected institutions without a high price tag. In the Southeast, students have the benefit of comprehensive rankings for the most affordable psychology degree programs in North Carolina.

By selecting the right online program, students can balance cost, flexibility, and long-term career potential in fields across psychology and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Pring

Trending Scientists