World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
12947
World Ranking
10854
National Ranking
4707

Robert N. Fariss publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert N. Fariss sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 242 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Robert N. Fariss D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert N. Fariss sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert N. Fariss is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans several areas within medicine, with a primary focus on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their investigations are particularly oriented toward the study of retinal development and disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, as well as mechanisms of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.

Fariss has contributed extensively to the fields of molecular biology and ophthalmology, among others. Their work also touches on neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine, infectious diseases, and various aspects of cellular transport and secretion.

Frequent co-authors in Fariss's research include Biying Xu, Anand Swaroop, Camasamudram Vijayasarathy, Lijin Dong, and Paul A. Sieving.

Notable publication venues for their work include eLife, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Human Gene Therapy, and Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

Recent papers associated with Robert N. Fariss include the following:

  • Genetic Rescue of X-Linked Retinoschisis Mouse ( Rs1 −/y ) Retina Induces Quiescence of the Retinal Microglial Inflammatory State Following AAV8- RS1 Gene Transfer and Identifies Gene Networks Underlying Retinal Recovery, 2020, Human Gene Therapy
  • Targeted Expression of Retinoschisin by Retinal Bipolar Cells in XLRS Promotes Resolution of Retinoschisis Cysts Sans RS1 From Photoreceptors, 2022, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Advances in understanding the molecular structure of retinoschisin while questions remain of biological function, 2022, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
  • Loss of endocytosis-associated RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration, 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • Widespread subclinical cellular changes revealed across a neural-epithelial-vascular complex in choroideremia using adaptive optics, 2022, Communications Biology

Best Publications

  • Histopathology of the human retina in retinitis pigmentosa

    A H Milam;Z Y Li;R N Fariss

  • Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Genetics and Biology Coming Together

    Lars G. Fritsche;Robert N. Fariss;Dwight Stambolian;Gonçalo R. Abecasis

  • Age-related alterations in the dynamic behavior of microglia.

    Mausam R. Damani;Lian Zhao;Aurora M. Fontainhas;Juan Amaral

  • Microglial phagocytosis of living photoreceptors contributes to inherited retinal degeneration.

    Lian Zhao;Matthew K Zabel;Xu Wang;Wenxin Ma

  • Microglial morphology and dynamic behavior is regulated by ionotropic glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission.

    Aurora M. Fontainhas;Minhua Wang;Katharine J. Liang;Shan Chen

  • VEGF-B is dispensable for blood vessel growth but critical for their survival, and VEGF-B targeting inhibits pathological angiogenesis

    Fan Zhang;Zhongshu Tang;Xu Hou;Johan Lennartsson

  • Abnormalities in rod photoreceptors, amacrine cells, and horizontal cells in human retinas with retinitis pigmentosa

    Robert N Fariss;Zong-Yi Li;Ann H Milam;Ann H Milam

  • Five Members of a Novel Ca2+-binding Protein (CABP) Subfamily with Similarity to Calmodulin

    Françoise Haeseleer;Izabela Sokal;Christophe L. M. J. Verlinde;Hediye Erdjument-Bromage

  • Requirement for Microglia for the Maintenance of Synaptic Function and Integrity in the Mature Retina

    Xu Wang;Lian Zhao;Jun Zhang;Robert N. Fariss

  • New views on RPE65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis.

    Mathias W. Seeliger;Christian Grimm;Fredrik Ståhlberg;Fredrik Ståhlberg;Christoph Friedburg

  • Microglia in the Mouse Retina Alter the Structure and Function of Retinal Pigmented Epithelial Cells: A Potential Cellular Interaction Relevant to AMD

    Wenxin Ma;Lian Zhao;Aurora M. Fontainhas;Robert N. Fariss

  • Ex Vivo Dynamic Imaging of Retinal Microglia Using Time-Lapse Confocal Microscopy

    Jung Eun Lee;Katharine J. Liang;Robert N. Fariss;Wai T. Wong

  • Adaptive Müller cell responses to microglial activation mediate neuroprotection and coordinate inflammation in the retina

    Minhua Wang;Wenxin Ma;Lian Zhao;Robert N Fariss

  • Regulation of dynamic behavior of retinal microglia by CX3CR1 signaling.

    Katharine J. Liang;Jung Eun Lee;Yunqing D. Wang;Wenxin Ma

  • Macroglia-Microglia Interactions via TSPO Signaling Regulates Microglial Activation in the Mouse Retina

    Minhua Wang;Xu Wang;Lian Zhao;Wenxin Ma

  • High expression levels in cones of RGS9, the predominant GTPase accelerating protein of rods

    Christopher W. Cowan;Robert N. Fariss;Izabela Sokal;Krzysztof Palczewski

  • Uptake of cholesterol by the retina occurs primarily via a low density lipoprotein receptor-mediated process.

    Nomingerel Tserentsoodol;Jorge Sztein;Mercedes Campos;Natalya V Gordiyenko

  • Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 is a component of Bruch's membrane of the eye.

    Robert N. Fariss;Suneel S. Apte;Bjorn R. Olsen;Kazushi Iwata

  • Expression of Mutated Mouse Myocilin Induces Open-Angle Glaucoma in Transgenic Mice

    Vladimir Senatorov;Irina Malyukova;Robert Fariss;Eric F. Wawrousek

  • Disruption of microfilament organization and deregulation of disk membrane morphogenesis by cytochalasin D in rod and cone photoreceptors.

    David S. Williams;Kenneth A. Linberg;Dana K. Vaughan;Robert N. Fariss

Frequent Co-Authors

Anand Swaroop
Anand Swaroop National Institutes of Health
Paul A. Sieving
Paul A. Sieving University of California, Davis
Chi-Chao Chan
Chi-Chao Chan National Institutes of Health
Robert B. Nussenblatt
Robert B. Nussenblatt National Institutes of Health
Graeme Wistow
Graeme Wistow National Institutes of Health
Eric F. Wawrousek
Eric F. Wawrousek National Institutes of Health
Steven K. Fisher
Steven K. Fisher University of California, Santa Barbara
Krzysztof Palczewski
Krzysztof Palczewski University of California, Irvine
Tiansen Li
Tiansen Li National Institutes of Health
Igal Gery
Igal Gery National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Biology or Biochemistry can open doors to various online degree options and professional pathways in the USA. Many students now choose flexible learning through the online biology degree route, which offers accelerated study and remote access to coursework— ideal for working adults or those with other commitments.

Another popular track is health care, with online associate rn programs providing a streamlined way to join the nursing profession. These programs combine science fundamentals with essential clinical training, setting the stage for immediate employment after graduation.

For those interested in dietetics and wellness, the best online nutrition degree programs teach evidence-based approaches to human health, preparing graduates for careers in nutrition counseling, community health, or food science.

Students aiming for leadership or administrative roles in healthcare might pursue one of the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited, which offer advanced training in hospital and health system management.

Best Scientists Citing Robert N. Fariss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles