World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 111 5259 4934 2837 2628 552 57610

Vivek Y. Reddy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vivek Y. Reddy between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vivek Y. Reddy published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 20.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 125 publications in 2025. 128 of the 646 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 125. Peak 125 publications in 2025. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 51 publications 2021: 70 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 125 publications 2026: 3 publications
1995 2026

646 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vivek Y. Reddy: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 5
2004 9
2005 28
2006 23
2007 19
2008 23
2009 19
2010 14
2011 25
2012 30
2013 28
2014 22
2015 27
2016 36
2017 32
2018 21
2019 31
2020 51
2021 70
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 125
2026 3
Total 646
Download as CSV

Vivek Y. Reddy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vivek Y. Reddy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 552 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 552
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Vivek Y. Reddy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vivek Y. Reddy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 111
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Vivek Y. Reddy is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the field of medicine, with a strong emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Within this domain, their work extensively covers topics related to cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, as well as cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies.

The scientist has contributed significantly to the study of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, and cardiac structural anomalies and repair. Their research outputs are prominently published in specialist medical and cardiovascular journals.

Recent notable papers authored by Vivek Y. Reddy include:

  • Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (2023) in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (2021) in JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
  • Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (2020) in Journal of the American College of Cardiology

These publications reflect a particular focus on atrial fibrillation and emerging ablation techniques for cardiac arrhythmias.

Vivek Y. Reddy frequently collaborates with several coauthors, among whom are:

  • Petr Neužil
  • Jacob S. Koruth
  • Srinivas R. Dukkipati
  • Mohit K. Turagam
  • Daniel R. Musikantow

These collaborations have contributed to the substantial number of scientific outputs and advancements in the field.

The scientist's work appears regularly in several key publication venues, including:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
  • EP Europace

These journals are well recognized within cardiology and electrophysiology research communities for disseminating advances related to cardiac arrhythmias and treatments.

Overall, the body of work by Vivek Y. Reddy is grounded in the specialties of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, concentrating on electrophysiological interventions and management strategies for atrial fibrillation and related cardiac conditions.

Best Publications

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Alain Bonafe;Hans Christoph Diener

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial

    David R Holmes;Vivek Y Reddy;Zoltan G Turi;Shephal K Doshi

  • Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long-Term Warfarin Therapy: The PREVAIL Trial

    David R. Holmes;Saibal Kar;Matthew J. Price;Brian Whisenant

  • Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial

    David J. Wilber;Carlo Pappone;Petr Neuzil;Angelo De Paola

  • EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA).

    Etienne M. Aliot;William G. Stevenson;Jesus Ma Almendral-Garrote;Frank Bogun

  • Safety of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Results From the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With AF (PROTECT AF) Clinical Trial and the Continued Access Registry

    Vivek Y. Reddy;David Holmes;Shephal K. Doshi;Petr Neuzil

  • Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Matthew R. Reynolds;Petr Neuzil;Allison W. Richardson

  • Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial.

    Douglas L. Packer;Robert C. Kowal;Kevin R. Wheelan;James M. Irwin

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Vivek Y Reddy;Horst Sievert;Jonathan Halperin;Shephal K Doshi

  • 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Shephal K. Doshi;Saibal Kar;Douglas N. Gibson

  • Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology).

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Sven Möbius-Winkler;Marc A. Miller;Petr Neuzil

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prophylaxis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Trial

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Shephal K. Doshi;Horst Sievert;Maurice Buchbinder

  • The clinical impact of incomplete left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman Device in patients with atrial fibrillation: a PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) substudy.

    Juan F. Viles-Gonzalez;Saibal Kar;Pamela Douglas;Srinivas Dukkipati

  • Left Atrial Appendage Closure as an Alternative to Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

    David R. Holmes;Shephal K. Doshi;Saibal Kar;Matthew J. Price

  • Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Derek V. Exner;Daniel J. Cantillon;Rahul Doshi

  • EHRA/HRS expert consensus on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

    Etienne M. Aliot;William G. Stevenson;Jesus Ma Almendral-Garrote;Frank Bogun

  • The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Dipen Shah;Josef Kautzner;Boris Schmidt

  • Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial.

    Andrea Natale;Vivek Y. Reddy;George Monir;David J. Wilber

Frequent Co-Authors

Petr Neuzil
Petr Neuzil Harvard University
Jeremy N. Ruskin
Jeremy N. Ruskin Harvard University
Andrea Natale
Andrea Natale Case Western Reserve University
David R. Holmes
David R. Holmes Mayo Clinic
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Lawrence R. Wechsler
Lawrence R. Wechsler University of Pennsylvania
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Karl-Heinz Kuck Universität Hamburg
Horst Sievert
Horst Sievert Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt
Jonathan L. Halperin
Jonathan L. Halperin Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related healthcare careers is a smart move for those interested in medicine but seeking flexible study options. Many students consider online direct entry msn programs, which allow graduates from non-nursing backgrounds to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles. These accelerated degrees can open doors to leadership and specialized positions in patient care.

For those looking for a more accessible entry into nursing, adn programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) often have less competitive admission requirements and can help you become a registered nurse in less time. Some nursing schools offer flexible pathways by not requiring standardized tests. Find out if do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school for your program of interest.

If you’re looking for administrative healthcare roles, consider online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa. These programs offer a fast, affordable route into medical support careers, often with the flexibility of online study and the possibility of financial aid.

Best Scientists Citing Vivek Y. Reddy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles