World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
30473
World Ranking
15459
National Ranking
7797

Petr Neuzil publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Neuzil sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Petr Neuzil D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Neuzil sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Petr Neuzil is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their publication record encompasses various subfields such as surgery, biomedical engineering, neurology, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics related to cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, and cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias. Additional topics include neurological disorders and treatments, mechanical circulatory support devices, and cardiac structural anomalies and repair.

Among recent papers associated with Petr Neuzil are:

  • Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, 2021, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • Subcutaneous or Transvenous Defibrillator Therapy, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF), 2022, EP Europace

Frequent co-authors working with Petr Neuzil include:

  • Vivek Y. Reddy
  • Jan Petrů
  • Moritoshi Funasako
  • Pavel Hála
  • Jacob S. Koruth

Petr Neuzil's research has been published repeatedly in several key venues such as:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • EP Europace
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Best Publications

  • Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial

    David J. Wilber;Carlo Pappone;Petr Neuzil;Angelo De Paola

  • Safety of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Results From the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With AF (PROTECT AF) Clinical Trial and the Continued Access Registry

    Vivek Y. Reddy;David Holmes;Shephal K. Doshi;Petr Neuzil

  • Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Matthew R. Reynolds;Petr Neuzil;Allison W. Richardson

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Vivek Y Reddy;Horst Sievert;Jonathan Halperin;Shephal K Doshi

  • 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Shephal K. Doshi;Saibal Kar;Douglas N. Gibson

  • Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology).

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Sven Möbius-Winkler;Marc A. Miller;Petr Neuzil

  • A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System

    Dwight Reynolds;Gabor Z. Duray;Razali Omar;Kyoko Soejima

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prophylaxis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Trial

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Shephal K. Doshi;Horst Sievert;Maurice Buchbinder

  • Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial

    Luigi Di Biase;Prashant Mohanty;Sanghamitra Mohanty;Pasquale Santangeli

  • The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Dipen Shah;Josef Kautzner;Boris Schmidt

  • Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Petr Neuzil;Jacob S. Koruth;Jan Petru

  • Worldwide experience with a totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: early results from the EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry.

    Pier D Lambiase;Craig Barr;Dominic A M J Theuns;Reinoud Knops

  • Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

    Pavel Osmancik;Dalibor Herman;Petr Neuzil;Pavel Hala

  • Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study.

    Petr Neuzil;Vivek Y. Reddy;Josef Kautzner;Jan Petru

  • Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Force-Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Srinivas R. Dukkipati;Petr Neuzil;Andrea Natale

  • Chronic vagal stimulation for the treatment of low ejection fraction heart failure: results of the NEural Cardiac TherApy foR Heart Failure (NECTAR-HF) randomized controlled trial

    Faiez Zannad;Gaetano M. De Ferrari;Anton E. Tuinenburg;David Wright

  • EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

    Josef Kautzner;Petr Neuzil;Hendrik Lambert;Petr Peichl

  • Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Reinoud E. Knops;Johannes Sperzel;Marc A. Miller

  • A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study

    Karl-Heinz Kuck;Vivek Y. Reddy;Boris Schmidt;Andrea Natale

  • Renal sympathetic denervation using an irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for the management of drug-resistant hypertension.

    Humera Ahmed;Petr Neuzil;Jan Skoda;Jan Petru

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivek Y. Reddy
Vivek Y. Reddy Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jeremy N. Ruskin
Jeremy N. Ruskin Harvard University
Andrea Natale
Andrea Natale Case Western Reserve University
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Karl-Heinz Kuck Universität Hamburg
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux
Horst Sievert
Horst Sievert Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt
Luigi Di Biase
Luigi Di Biase Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Roland E. Schmieder
Roland E. Schmieder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
David R. Holmes
David R. Holmes Mayo Clinic
Susanne S. Pedersen
Susanne S. Pedersen University of Southern Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine isn’t the only path for making an impact in healthcare. Many students explore flexible, online education options to kickstart or advance their careers. For those interested in advanced practice, finding the cheapest np school can open doors to becoming a Nurse Practitioner affordably, without sacrificing quality.

If you’re just starting out, pursuing a nursing degree online offers flexibility and access to programs tailored for working adults. Those who already hold an RN license may want to look into the cheapest bsn programs to further their education and improve patient outcomes.

For nurses seeking leadership roles or careers in research and education, exploring an online phd nursing program is a smart step. Online programs make it possible to balance work, family, and advanced study—all while preparing for high-impact positions within the healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Petr Neuzil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles