World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15458 14542 7796 7213 512 30473

Petr Neuzil publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Petr Neuzil between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Petr Neuzil published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2023. 55 of the 598 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2023. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 50 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 54 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 54 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

598 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Petr Neuzil: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 11
2006 14
2007 10
2008 10
2009 8
2010 10
2011 26
2012 21
2013 21
2014 21
2015 34
2016 41
2017 30
2018 23
2019 22
2020 35
2021 50
2022 39
2023 54
2024 52
2025 54
2026 1
Total 598
Download as CSV

Petr Neuzil publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Neuzil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 512
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Petr Neuzil D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Neuzil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Petr Neuzil is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their publication record encompasses various subfields such as surgery, biomedical engineering, neurology, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics related to cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, and cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias. Additional topics include neurological disorders and treatments, mechanical circulatory support devices, and cardiac structural anomalies and repair.

Among recent papers associated with Petr Neuzil are:

  • Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, 2021, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • Subcutaneous or Transvenous Defibrillator Therapy, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF), 2022, EP Europace

Frequent co-authors working with Petr Neuzil include:

  • Vivek Y. Reddy
  • Jan Petrů
  • Moritoshi Funasako
  • Pavel Hála
  • Jacob S. Koruth

Petr Neuzil's research has been published repeatedly in several key venues such as:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • EP Europace
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Best Publications

  • Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial

    David J. Wilber;Carlo Pappone;Petr Neuzil;Angelo De Paola

  • Safety of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Results From the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With AF (PROTECT AF) Clinical Trial and the Continued Access Registry

    Vivek Y. Reddy;David Holmes;Shephal K. Doshi;Petr Neuzil

  • Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Matthew R. Reynolds;Petr Neuzil;Allison W. Richardson

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Vivek Y Reddy;Horst Sievert;Jonathan Halperin;Shephal K Doshi

  • 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Shephal K. Doshi;Saibal Kar;Douglas N. Gibson

  • Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology).

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Sven Möbius-Winkler;Marc A. Miller;Petr Neuzil

  • A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System

    Dwight Reynolds;Gabor Z. Duray;Razali Omar;Kyoko Soejima

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prophylaxis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Trial

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Shephal K. Doshi;Horst Sievert;Maurice Buchbinder

  • Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial

    Luigi Di Biase;Prashant Mohanty;Sanghamitra Mohanty;Pasquale Santangeli

  • The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Dipen Shah;Josef Kautzner;Boris Schmidt

  • Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Petr Neuzil;Jacob S. Koruth;Jan Petru

  • Worldwide experience with a totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: early results from the EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry.

    Pier D Lambiase;Craig Barr;Dominic A M J Theuns;Reinoud Knops

  • Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

    Pavel Osmancik;Dalibor Herman;Petr Neuzil;Pavel Hala

  • Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study.

    Petr Neuzil;Vivek Y. Reddy;Josef Kautzner;Jan Petru

  • Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Force-Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Srinivas R. Dukkipati;Petr Neuzil;Andrea Natale

  • Chronic vagal stimulation for the treatment of low ejection fraction heart failure: results of the NEural Cardiac TherApy foR Heart Failure (NECTAR-HF) randomized controlled trial

    Faiez Zannad;Gaetano M. De Ferrari;Anton E. Tuinenburg;David Wright

  • EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

    Josef Kautzner;Petr Neuzil;Hendrik Lambert;Petr Peichl

  • Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Reinoud E. Knops;Johannes Sperzel;Marc A. Miller

  • A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study

    Karl-Heinz Kuck;Vivek Y. Reddy;Boris Schmidt;Andrea Natale

  • Renal sympathetic denervation using an irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for the management of drug-resistant hypertension.

    Humera Ahmed;Petr Neuzil;Jan Skoda;Jan Petru

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivek Y. Reddy
Vivek Y. Reddy Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jeremy N. Ruskin
Jeremy N. Ruskin Harvard University
Andrea Natale
Andrea Natale Case Western Reserve University
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Karl-Heinz Kuck Universität Hamburg
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux
Horst Sievert
Horst Sievert Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt
Luigi Di Biase
Luigi Di Biase Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Roland E. Schmieder
Roland E. Schmieder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
David R. Holmes
David R. Holmes Mayo Clinic
Susanne S. Pedersen
Susanne S. Pedersen University of Southern Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine isn’t the only path for making an impact in healthcare. Many students explore flexible, online education options to kickstart or advance their careers. For those interested in advanced practice, finding the cheapest np school can open doors to becoming a Nurse Practitioner affordably, without sacrificing quality.

If you’re just starting out, pursuing a nursing degree online offers flexibility and access to programs tailored for working adults. Those who already hold an RN license may want to look into the cheapest bsn programs to further their education and improve patient outcomes.

For nurses seeking leadership roles or careers in research and education, exploring an online phd nursing program is a smart step. Online programs make it possible to balance work, family, and advanced study—all while preparing for high-impact positions within the healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Petr Neuzil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles