World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
117
Citations
58305
World Ranking
4168
National Ranking
2286

Jeremy N. Ruskin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy N. Ruskin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 641 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jeremy N. Ruskin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy N. Ruskin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy N. Ruskin is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, specifically in the fields of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Within these areas, their work spans subfields such as surgery, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's main topics of research include:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Jeremy N. Ruskin has published extensively, with frequent appearances in notable medical journals. The top publication venues for their work include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Heart Rhythm
  • The American Journal of Cardiology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ruskin cover a range of topics within cardiology and electrophysiology:

  • Use of Flecainide for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Does early detection of atrial fibrillation reduce the risk of thromboembolic events? Rationale and design of the Heartline study, 2023, American Heart Journal
  • Utilization and Complications of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infective Endocarditis, Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis, and Native Valve Endocarditis: A Nationwide Study, 2003 to 2017, 2022, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Gelatin Methacryloyl Bioadhesive Improves Survival and Reduces Scar Burden in a Mouse Model of Myocardial Infarction, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association

Collaborations have been a part of Ruskin's research output, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Guy Rozen
  • E. Kevin Heist
  • Gabby Elbaz-Greener
  • Leon M. Ptaszek
  • Pegah Khaloo

Best Publications

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Hugh Calkins;Josep Brugada;Douglas L. Packer;Riccardo Cappato

  • HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

    Hugh Calkins;Josep Brugada;Douglas L. Packer;Ricardo Cappato

  • Electrical Alternans and Vulnerability to Ventricular Arrhythmias

    David S. Rosenbaum;Lance E. Jackson;Joseph M. Smith;Hasan Garan

  • Fish Consumption and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death

    Christine M. Albert;Charles H. Hennekens;Christopher J. O'Donnell;Umed A. Ajani

  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: electrophysiologic observations and selection of long-term antiarrhythmic therapy.

    Jeremy N. Ruskin;John P. DiMarco;Hasan Garan

  • Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy.

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Matthew R. Reynolds;Petr Neuzil;Allison W. Richardson

  • Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial.

    Douglas L. Packer;Robert C. Kowal;Kevin R. Wheelan;James M. Irwin

  • Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability.

    J M Smith;E A Clancy;C R Valeri;J N Ruskin

  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Use of electrophysiologic testing in the prediction of long-term outcome.

    D J Wilber;H Garan;D Finkelstein;E Kelly

  • Cryothermal ablation: mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.

    Daniel L. Lustgarten;David Keane;Jeremy Ruskin

  • Prospective Study of Sudden Cardiac Death Among Women in the United States

    Christine M. Albert;Claudia U. Chae;Francine Grodstein;Lynda M. Rose

  • The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: efficacy, complications and survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias

    Patricia A. Kelly;David S. Cannom;Hasan Garan;Gloria S. Mirabal

  • Cognitive impairment associated with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

    Shadi Kalantarian;Theodore A. Stern;Moussa Mansour;Jeremy N. Ruskin

  • Drugs That Induce Repolarization Abnormalities Cause Bradycardia in Zebrafish

    David J. Milan;Travis A. Peterson;Jeremy N. Ruskin;Randall T. Peterson

  • An occidental case of cardiomyopathy and selenium deficiency.

    Robert Arnold Johnson;Susan S. Baker;John T. Fallon;Edwin P. Maynard

  • Drug-induced torsades de pointes and implications for drug development.

    Robert R. Fenichel;Marek Malik;Charles Antzelevitch;Michael Sanguinetti

  • The QT Interval

    Martin M. Bednar;Edmund P. Harrigan;Richard J. Anziano;A.John Camm

  • Feasibility and Safety of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From a Multicenter Prospective Registry

    Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy;Yeruva Madhu Reddy;Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;Subba Reddy Vanga

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivek Y. Reddy
Vivek Y. Reddy Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Petr Neuzil
Petr Neuzil Harvard University
Michael H. Picard
Michael H. Picard Harvard University
Andrea Natale
Andrea Natale Case Western Reserve University
Patrick T. Ellinor
Patrick T. Ellinor Harvard University
Christine M. Albert
Christine M. Albert Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Luigi Di Biase
Luigi Di Biase Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Hugh Calkins
Hugh Calkins Johns Hopkins University
A. John Camm
A. John Camm St George's, University of London
Mark E. Josephson
Mark E. Josephson Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a future in medicine, online healthcare degrees can provide flexible options to advance your career. Many programs now cater to busy professionals or those seeking faster entry to clinical roles. For example, online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements allow registered nurses to earn a bachelor's degree entirely online, making the process less stressful if you have limited time.

Those aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles may explore graduate-level options. Programs such as accelerated msn to dnp programs are designed for experienced nurses seeking a Doctor of Nursing Practice in the shortest possible time, while dnp online programs offer flexibility and individualized pacing for working professionals.

If you want to quickly start working in healthcare, fast track medical lpn courses provide an efficient pathway to become a Licensed Practical Nurse. These programs emphasize speed and convenience, opening doors to essential roles in patient care.

Whether you’re seeking rapid entry or advanced specialization, online degree pathways offer diverse routes toward a rewarding medical career.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy N. Ruskin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles