World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6666
World Ranking
10645
National Ranking
260

Guillaume Gravier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillaume Gravier sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Guillaume Gravier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillaume Gravier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guillaume Gravier is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS in France. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with substantial contributions in Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Signal Processing, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The scientist's work covers multiple subfields and topics including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Information Systems
  • Signal Processing
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Main topics of research focus on:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Guillaume Gravier has published work in a range of venues, with the most frequent including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
  • Semantic Web

Recent publications by Gravier consist of:

  • The ETAPE corpus for the evaluation of speech-based TV content processing in the French language, 2025, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Affect in Multimedia: Benchmarking Violent Scenes Detection, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
  • A survey on training and evaluation of word embeddings, 2021, International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
  • Understanding the phenomenology of reading through modelling, 2020, Semantic Web
  • A Study of the Plausibility of Attention between RNN Encoders in Natural Language Inference, 2021, 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)

Frequent collaborators in Gravier's research include:

  • Pascale Sébillot
  • Duc Hau Nguyen
  • Zenilton K. G. Patrocínio
  • Silvio Jamil F. Guimarães
  • Géraud Faye

Best Publications

  • A tutorial on text-independent speaker verification

    Frédéric Bimbot;Jean-François Bonastre;Corinne Fredouille;Guillaume Gravier

  • Recent advances in the automatic recognition of audiovisual speech

    G. Potamianos;C. Neti;G. Gravier;A. Garg

  • The ESTER Phase II Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcription of French Broadcast News

    Sylvain Galliano;Edouard Geoffrois;Djamel Mostefa;Khalid Choukri

  • The ESTER 2 Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcription of French Radio Broadcasts

    Sylvain Galliano;Guillaume Gravier;Laura Chaubard

  • Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Laurent Amsaleg;Benoit Huet;Martha Larson;Martha Larson;Guillaume Gravier

  • The ETAPE corpus for the evaluation of speech-based TV content processing in the French language

    Guillaume Gravier;Gilles Adda;Niklas Paulsson;Matthieu Carr'e

  • Corpus description of the ESTER Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcription of French Broadcast News

    Sylvain Galliano;Edouard Geoffrois;Guillaume Gravier;Jean-François Bonastre

  • Speaker diarization using bottom-up clustering based on a parameter-derived distance between adapted GMMs.

    Michael Betser;Frédéric Bimbot;Mathieu Ben;Guillaume Gravier

  • HMM based structuring of tennis videos using visual and audio cues

    E. Kijak;G. Gravier;P. Gros;L. Oisel

  • Audiovisual integration for tennis broadcast structuring

    Ewa Kijak;Guillaume Gravier;Lionel Oisel;Patrick Gros

  • The ESTER Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcription of French Broadcast News

    Guillaume Gravier;Jean-François Bonastre;Edouard Geoffrois;Sylvain Galliano

  • The spoken web search task at MediaEval 2012

    Florian Metze;Xavier Anguera;Etienne Barnard;Marelie Davel

  • The Spoken Web Search Task at MediaEval 2011

    Florian Metze;Nitendra Rajput;Xavier Anguera;Marelie Davel

  • Audio keyword extraction by unsupervised word discovery

    Armando Muscariello;Guillaume Gravier;Frédéric Bimbot

  • Asynchrony modeling for audio-visual speech recognition

    Guillaume Gravier;Gerasimos Potamianos;Chalapathy Neti

  • VSD, a public dataset for the detection of violent scenes in movies: design, annotation, analysis and evaluation

    Claire-Hélène Demarty;Cédric Penet;Mohammad Soleymani;Guillaume Gravier

  • The Spoken Web Search Task

    Florian Metze;Etienne Barnard;Marelie H. Davel;Charl Johannes van Heerden

  • The MediaEval 2012 Affect Task: Violent Scenes Detection

    Claire-Hélène Demarty;Cédric Penet;Guillaume Gravier;Mohammad Soleymani

  • Multimedia information seeking through search and hyperlinking

    Maria Eskevich;Gareth J.F. Jones;Robin Aly;Roeland J.F. Ordelman

  • Maximum entropy and MCE based HMM stream weight estimation for audio-visual ASR

    Guillaume Gravier;Scott Axelrod;Gerasimos Potamianos;Chalapathy Neti

  • Working Notes Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop

    Guillaume Gravier;Demarty Claire-Hélène;Hervé Bredin;Ionescu Bogdan

Frequent Co-Authors

Frédéric Bimbot
Frédéric Bimbot French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Martha Larson
Martha Larson Radboud University
Mohammad Soleymani
Mohammad Soleymani University of Southern California
Jean-François Bonastre
Jean-François Bonastre University of Avignon
Hervé Jégou
Hervé Jégou Facebook (United States)
Chalapathy Neti
Chalapathy Neti IBM (United States)
Gareth J. F. Jones
Gareth J. F. Jones Dublin City University
Gerasimos Potamianos
Gerasimos Potamianos University Of Thessaly
Florian Metze
Florian Metze Carnegie Mellon University
Xavier Anguera
Xavier Anguera ELSA Speak

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science studies in the USA opens many flexible online learning options. For those looking to save time, fastest masters degree online programs allow you to earn advanced credentials in under two years. These accelerated pathways can quickly boost your career with minimal disruption to work or personal life.

Many students aim for degrees that guarantee strong job prospects. The most useful graduate degrees in Computer Science are highly sought after by major employers, making them a sensible investment in your future. If you’re starting your educational journey, consider 2 year online degrees for foundational knowledge and entry-level positions.

Cost is also a major consideration. Choosing one of the most affordable online colleges can help you achieve your academic and career goals without overwhelming student debt. With a wide range of online degree programs and career pathways, it’s possible to find an affordable, respected, and flexible route into tech.

Best Scientists Citing Guillaume Gravier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles