World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Herbert Hoijtink

Herbert Hoijtink

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
8919
World Ranking
4678
National Ranking
188

Herbert Hoijtink publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert Hoijtink sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Herbert Hoijtink D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert Hoijtink sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Herbert Hoijtink is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on advanced statistical methods and Bayesian inference, with specific attention to statistical methods in clinical trials and animal testing.

Their published works span various domains within mathematics and psychology, emphasizing statistical methods and models. The main fields of study include:

  • Mathematics

Subfields cover a diverse range:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Small Animals
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Hoijtink has contributed to several focused topics:

  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods

Their recent papers include:

  • A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research., 2022, Psychological Methods
  • Increasing the statistical power of animal experiments with historical control data, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • BFpack: Flexible Bayes Factor Testing of Scientific Theories in R, 2021, Journal of Statistical Software
  • Sample-size determination for the Bayesian t test and Welch's test using the approximate adjusted fractional Bayes factor, 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • Robust longitudinal multi-cohort results: The development of self-control during adolescence, 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hoijtink are:

  • Caspar J. Van Lissa
  • Joris Mulder
  • Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg
  • Zoltán Dienes
  • Qianrao Fu

Common publication venues for their work include:

  • Psychological Methods
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Meta-Psychology
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • Behavior Research Methods

Best Publications

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models

    Richard Scheines;Herbert Hoijtink;Anne Boomsma

  • Inequality Constrained Analysis of Variance: A Bayesian Approach.

    Irene Klugkist;Olav Laudy;Herbert Hoijtink

  • Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the inventory of traumatic grief (ITG).

    Paul A Boelen;Jan Van Den Bout;Jos De Keijser;Herbert Hoijtink

  • The many null distributions of person fit indices

    Ivo W. Molenaar;Herbert Hoijtink

  • A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.

    Herbert Hoijtink;Joris Mulder;Caspar van Lissa;Xin Gu

  • The Multidimensionality of Self-Report Schizotypy in a Psychiatric Population: An Analysis Using Multidimensional Rasch Models

    Meinte G. Vollema;Herbert Hoijtink

  • The Best of Both Worlds: Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data Using Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modeling

    Angelika Glockner-Rist;Herbert Hoijtink

  • Informative Hypotheses: Theory and Practice for Behavioral and Social Scientists

    Herbert Hoijtink

  • The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models

    Irene Klugkist;Herbert Hoijtink

  • Bayesian Evaluation of Informative Hypotheses

    Herbert Hoijtink;Irene Klugkist;Paul A Boelen

  • A multidimensional item response model: Constrained latent class analysis using the gibbs sampler and posterior predictive checks

    Herbert Hoijtink;Ivo W. Molenaar

  • Equality and inequality constrained multivariate linear models: objective model selection using constrained posterior priors

    Joris Mulder;Herbert Hoijtink;Irene Klugkist

  • The role of executive functions in numerical magnitude skills

    Meijke E. Kolkman;Herbert J.A. Hoijtink;Evelyn H. Kroesbergen;Paul P.M. Leseman

  • BIEMS : A Fortran 90 program for calculating Bayes factors for inequality and equality constrained models

    C. de Leeuw;H. Hoijtink;J. Mulder

  • Bayesian model selection using encompassing priors

    Irene Klugkist;Bernet Kato;Herbert Hoijtink

  • Bayesian model selection of informative hypotheses for repeated measurements

    Joris Mulder;Irene Klugkist;Rens van de Schoot;Wim H.J. Meeus

  • A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data

    Herbert Hoijtink

  • On person parameter estimation in the dichotomous Rasch model

    Herbert Hoijtink;Anne Boomsma

  • Intraindividual variability in infant behavior.

    C. de Weerth;P. L. C. Van Geert;H.J.A. Hoijtink

  • Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses

    Xin Gu;Xin Gu;Joris Mulder;Herbert Hoijtink

Frequent Co-Authors

Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen Utrecht University
Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University
Magnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson Stockholm School of Economics
David Cesarini
David Cesarini New York University
Thomas D. Cook
Thomas D. Cook University of Wisconsin–Madison
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Yves Rosseel
Yves Rosseel Ghent University
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Valen E. Johnson
Valen E. Johnson Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree in psychology programs can open doors to a wide range of entry-level roles in counseling, education, and human resources. Many students select these online pathways for their flexibility and affordability, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments.

For those passionate about social welfare, a masters in social work online is a practical route into community outreach, clinical services, and public administration. These programs cater to both recent graduates and working professionals seeking career advancement or a sector change.

If your goal is to practice as a licensed clinical psychologist, pursuing a psyd program online offers focused training in psychological assessment and therapeutic techniques. These degrees are ideal for those aiming for clinical and counseling positions that require advanced licensure.

Interested in helping families and couples? The mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) online provide tailored preparation for careers in family therapy and relationship counseling, with options for accelerated study.

Each pathway supports diverse interests and professional ambitions within the social sciences and humanities, providing students with flexible access to rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Herbert Hoijtink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles