World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4293
World Ranking
12257
National Ranking
4968

Linda K. Nozick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda K. Nozick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Linda K. Nozick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda K. Nozick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda K. Nozick is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, and Atmospheric Science.

Their academic work covers a broad spectrum of topics that include:

  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Insurance and Financial Risk Management
  • Housing Market and Economics

Recent scholarly papers by Nozick include:

  • A stochastic optimization model for staged hospital evacuation during hurricanes, 2021, Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
  • Modeling hurricane evacuation behavior using a dynamic discrete choice framework, 2021, Transportation Research Part B Methodological
  • Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services, 2022, Natural Hazards
  • Homeowner mitigation decision-making: Exploring the theory of planned behaviour approach, 2020, Journal of Flood Risk Management
  • Household Adaptations to Infrastructure System Service Interruptions, 2022, Journal of Infrastructure Systems

Nozick frequently publishes in journals and conferences such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Natural Hazards
  • Natural Hazards Review
  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Collaboration is a component of Nozick's work, with repeated coauthorship from several researchers, including:

  • Rachel A. Davidson
  • Joseph Trainor
  • Meghan Millea
  • Jamie Kruse
  • Caroline J. Williams

Best Publications

  • Inventory, transportation, service quality and the location of distribution centers

    Linda K. Nozick;Mark A. Turnquist

  • Shelter location and transportation planning under hurricane conditions

    Anna C.Y. Li;Linda Nozick;Ningxiong Xu;Rachel Davidson

  • Integrating inventory impacts into a fixed-charge model for locating distribution centers

    Linda K. Nozick;Mark A. Turnquist

  • Robust optimization for fleet planning under uncertainty

    George F List;Bryan Wood;Linda K Nozick;Mark A Turnquist

  • Optimizing scheduling of post‐earthquake electric power restoration tasks

    Ningxiong Xu;Seth D. Guikema;Rachel A. Davidson;Linda K. Nozick

  • A two-echelon inventory allocation and distribution center location analysis

    Linda K. Nozick;Mark A. Turnquist

  • Modeling supplier selection and the use of option contracts for global supply chain design

    Ningxiong Xu;Linda Nozick

  • Multiobjective Path Finding in Stochastic Dynamic Networks, with Application to Routing Hazardous Materials Shipments

    Tsung-Sheng Chang;Linda K. Nozick;Mark A. Turnquist

  • The fixed charge facility location problem with coverage restrictions

    L.K. Nozick

  • A model for medium-term operations planning in an intermodal rail-truck service

    Linda K. Nozick;Edward K. Morlok

  • INTEGRATED ROUTING AND SCHEDULING IN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION

    Linda K. Nozick;George F. List;Mark A. Turnquist

  • Investment Planning for Electric Power Systems Under Terrorist Threat

    N. Romero;Ningxiong Xu;L. K. Nozick;I. Dobson

  • Identifying geographically diverse routes for the transportation of hazardous materials

    Yashoda Dadkar;Dean Jones;Linda K Nozick

  • Transmission and Generation Expansion to Mitigate Seismic Risk

    Natalia R. Romero;Linda K. Nozick;Ian D. Dobson;Ningxiong Xu

  • Assessing the performance of interdependent infrastructures and optimising investments

    Linda K. Nozick;Mark A. Turnquist;Dean A. Jones;Jennifer R. Davis

  • Sizing the US destroyer fleet

    Michael Crary;Linda K. Nozick;Lyn R. Whitaker

  • Strategic design of distribution systems with economies of scale in transportation

    Jenn-Rong Lin;Linda K. Nozick;Mark A. Turnquist

  • Game theory-based identification of facility use restrictions for the movement of hazardous materials under terrorist threat

    Allison Reilly;Linda Nozick;Ningxiong Xu;Dean Jones

  • Evaluation of travel demand measures and programs: a data envelopment analysis approach

    Linda K. Nozick;Hector Borderas;Arnim H. Meyburg

  • Optimization Of The Issuance Of Evacuation Orders Under Evolving Hurricane Conditions

    Wenqi Yi;Linda Nozick;Rachel Davidson;Brian Blanton

  • Investment Planning for Electric Power Systems under Terrorist Threat.

    Dean A. Jones;Linda Karen. Nozick;Natalia Romero;Ningxiong Xu

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Turnquist
Mark A. Turnquist Cornell University
Brian A. Colle
Brian A. Colle Stony Brook University
Ian Dobson
Ian Dobson Iowa State University
Thomas D. O’Rourke
Thomas D. O’Rourke Cornell University
Barry D. Davidson
Barry D. Davidson Syracuse University
Seth D. Guikema
Seth D. Guikema University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anthony R. Ingraffea
Anthony R. Ingraffea Cornell University
Alan T. Zehnder
Alan T. Zehnder Cornell University
Kate Starbird
Kate Starbird University of Washington
Yang Hong
Yang Hong University of Oklahoma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees offers flexibility and access to specialized career paths in computer science. Choosing from highly accredited online universities ensures that your education meets rigorous standards and is respected by employers.

For students interested in creative technology, a game development online degree combines programming skills with design principles to prepare graduates for the growing video game industry.

As digital threats increase, there is strong demand for cyber professionals. Pursuing a cyber security degree online equips students with essential skills to protect systems and data, leading to high-impact careers across many sectors.

Students seeking to blend technology and management might consider the best online construction management degree. This pathway prepares professionals to oversee complex projects using the latest digital tools in construction.

Best Scientists Citing Linda K. Nozick

Trending Scientists