World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
7314
World Ranking
10587
National Ranking
89

Juha Plosila publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juha Plosila sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 352 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Juha Plosila D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juha Plosila sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Juha Plosila is affiliated with the University of Turku in Finland and has contributed extensively to the fields of computer science and engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields, notably computer vision and pattern recognition, computer networks and communications, electrical and electronic engineering, aerospace engineering, and control and systems engineering.

Their main topics of work include robotic path planning algorithms, distributed control multi-agent systems, UAV applications and optimization, robotics and sensor-based localization, advanced memory and neural computing, IoT and edge/fog computing, and modular robots and swarm intelligence.

Frequent co-authors of Juha Plosila include Mohammad-Hashem Haghbayan, Hannu Tenhunen, Jawad N. Yasin, Sherif A. S. Mohamed, and Jukka Heikkonen.

Plosila's publications commonly appear in these venues:

  • IEEE Access
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine

Recent papers by Plosila include:

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Collision Avoidance Systems and Approaches, 2020, IEEE Access
  • GeFeS: A generalized wrapper feature selection approach for optimizing classification performance, 2020, Computers in Biology and Medicine
  • Low-cost ultrasonic based object detection and collision avoidance method for autonomous robots, 2020, International Journal of Information Technology
  • Energy-Efficient Formation Morphing for Collision Avoidance in a Swarm of Drones, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Methods for Distributed Control of a Hierarchical Formation of UAVs, 2020, IEEE Access

Best Publications

  • Timepix3: a 65K channel hybrid pixel readout chip with simultaneous ToA/ToT and sparse readout

    T Poikela;J Plosila;T Westerlund;M Campbell

  • Using Ant Colony System to Consolidate VMs for Green Cloud Computing

    Fahimeh Farahnakian;Adnan Ashraf;Tapio Pahikkala;Pasi Liljeberg

  • Swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles — A survey

    Anam Tahir;Jari Böling;Mohammad Hashem Haghbayan;Hannu T. Toivonen

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) : Collision Avoidance Systems and Approaches

    Jawad Naveed Yasin;Sherif Abdelmonem Sayed Mohamed;Mohammad Hashem Haghbayan;Jukka Heikkonen

  • LiRCUP: Linear Regression Based CPU Usage Prediction Algorithm for Live Migration of Virtual Machines in Data Centers

    Fahimeh Farahnakian;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • Network on Chip Routing Algorithms

    Ville Rantala;Teijo Lehtonen;Juha Plosila

  • A Survey on Odometry for Autonomous Navigation Systems

    Sherif A. S. Mohamed;Mohammad-Hashem Haghbayan;Tomi Westerlund;Jukka Heikkonen

  • Energy-Efficient Virtual Machines Consolidation in Cloud Data Centers Using Reinforcement Learning

    Fahimeh Farahnakian;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • Energy-Aware VM Consolidation in Cloud Data Centers Using Utilization Prediction Model

    Fahimeh Farahnakian;Tapio Pahikkala;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • Online Reconfigurable Self-Timed Links for Fault Tolerant NoC

    Teijo Lehtonen;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • Utilization Prediction Aware VM Consolidation Approach for Green Cloud Computing

    Fahimeh Farahnakian;Tapio Pahikkala;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • Smart hill climbing for agile dynamic mapping in many-core systems

    Mohammad Fattah;Masoud Daneshtalab;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • Energy Aware Consolidation Algorithm Based on K-Nearest Neighbor Regression for Cloud Data Centers

    Fahimeh Farahnakian;Tapio Pahikkala;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • HARAQ: Congestion-Aware Learning Model for Highly Adaptive Routing Algorithm in On-Chip Networks

    Masoumeh Ebrahimi;Masoud Daneshtalab;Fahimeh Farahnakian;Juha Plosila

  • Self-Adaptive System for Addressing Permanent Errors in On-Chip Interconnects

    T. Lehtonen;D. Wolpert;P. Liljeberg;J. Plosila

  • Path-Based Partitioning Methods for 3D Networks-on-Chip with Minimal Adaptive Routing

    Masoumeh Ebrahimi;Masoud Daneshtalab;Pasi Liljeberg;Juha Plosila

  • Congestion aware, fault tolerant, and thermally efficient inter-layer communication scheme for hybrid NoC-bus 3D architectures

    Amir-Mohammad Rahmani;Khalid Latif;Kameswar Rao Vaddina;Pasi Liljeberg

  • Fault-tolerant routing algorithm for 3D NoC using Hamiltonian path strategy

    Masoumeh Ebrahimi;Masoud Daneshtalab;Juha Plosila

  • CoNA: Dynamic application mapping for congestion reduction in many-core systems

    Mohamamd Fattah;Marco Ramirez;Masoud Daneshtalab;Pasi Liljeberg

  • An Intrusion Detection System for Fog Computing and IoT based Logistic Systems using a Smart Data Approach

    Farhoud Hosseinpour;Payam Vahdani Amoli;Juha Plosila;Timo Hämäläinen

Frequent Co-Authors

Hannu Tenhunen
Hannu Tenhunen Royal Institute of Technology
Pasi Liljeberg
Pasi Liljeberg University of Turku
Masoud Daneshtalab
Masoud Daneshtalab Mälardalen University
Tomi Westerlund
Tomi Westerlund University of Turku
Tapio Pahikkala
Tapio Pahikkala University of Turku
Maurizio Palesi
Maurizio Palesi University of Catania
Timo Hämäläinen
Timo Hämäläinen Tampere University
Ali Afzali-Kusha
Ali Afzali-Kusha University of Tehran
Onur Mutlu
Onur Mutlu ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and flexible career pathways. Whether you are beginning your academic journey or aiming to advance your expertise, there are diverse online options to suit your goals.

If you’re looking for a faster, cost-effective route, consider starting with an associate degree. Several associates degrees online can be completed in around 6 months, providing foundational skills for entry-level roles or further study.

For those aspiring to leadership, specialized research, or academic positions, enrolling in a cheapest phd programs or pursuing the cheapest ed.d online program can offer advanced credentials without breaking the bank.

Business and tech skills are in high demand. Many institutions now provide an affordable online business degree that complements a background in computer science, enhancing career mobility and opening doors to management roles.

By exploring these flexible and budget-friendly online pathways, you can find the right program to match your career ambitions in tech and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Juha Plosila

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles