World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9369 8757 88 86 89 8474

Skyler T. Hawk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Skyler T. Hawk between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Skyler T. Hawk published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2017. 12 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2017. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
2004 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Skyler T. Hawk: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 3
2010 3
2011 7
2012 3
2013 4
2014 7
2015 6
2016 9
2017 11
2018 2
2019 4
2020 9
2021 1
2022 8
2023 8
2024 4
2025 8
Total 103
Download as CSV

Skyler T. Hawk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Skyler T. Hawk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 89
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Skyler T. Hawk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Skyler T. Hawk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Skyler T. Hawk is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, education, and applied psychology.

The main topics of Hawk's work include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Hawk has authored multiple papers addressing these themes. Recent publications include:

  • "Personality Development from Age 12 to 25 and its Links with Life Transitions" (2020), published in European Journal of Personality
  • ""Me", "We", and Materialism: Associations between Contingent Self-Worth and Materialistic Values across Cultures" (2020), published in The Journal of Psychology
  • "Evaluating the Structure and Correlates of Helicopter Parenting in Mainland China" (2022), published in Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • "Emerging adults' cultural values, prosocial behaviors, and mental health in 14 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2022), published in International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • "Perceptions of Parental Privacy Invasion and Information Management among Chinese Adolescents: Comparing Between- and Within-Family Associations" (2023), published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence

The venues where Hawk frequently publishes demonstrate a consistent presence in adolescent and developmental psychology research, including:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Hawk's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Susan Branje (9 publications)
  • Yue Wang (5 publications)
  • Natalie Wong (5 publications)
  • Wenqing Zong (4 publications)
  • Jolien Van der Graaff (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database

    Oliver Langner;Ron Dotsch;Gijsbert Bijlstra;Daniel H. J. Wigboldus

  • Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes.

    Jolien Van der Graaff;Susan Branje;Minet De Wied;Skyler Hawk

  • Moving faces, looking places: validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES)

    Job Van Der Schalk;Skyler T. Hawk;Agneta H. Fischer;Bertjan Doosje

  • Convergent and divergent responses to emotional displays of ingroup and outgroup.

    Job Van Der Schalk;Agneta Fischer;Bertjan Doosje;Daniël Wigboldus

  • Examining the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) Among Early and Late Adolescents and Their Mothers

    S.T. Hawk;L. Keijsers;S.T.J. Branje;J. van der Graaff

  • Forbidden friends as forbidden fruit: parental supervision of friendships, contact with deviant peers, and adolescent delinquency.

    Loes Keijsers;Susan Branje;Skyler T. Hawk;Seth J. Schwartz

  • Self-concept clarity across adolescence : Longitudinal associations with open communication with parents and internalizing symptoms

    Marloes P. A. Van Dijk;Susan Branje;Loes Keijsers;Skyler T. Hawk

  • The Mediating Roles of Upward Social Comparison and Self-esteem and the Moderating Role of Social Comparison Orientation in the Association between Social Networking Site Usage and Subjective Well-Being.

    Jin-Liang Wang;Hai-Zhen Wang;James Gaskin;Skyler Hawk

  • Worth a Thousand Words

    Skyler T. Hawk;Gerben A. van Kleef;Agneta H. Fischer;Job Van Der Schalk

  • Adolescents’ Perceptions of Privacy Invasion in Reaction to Parental Solicitation and Control

    Skyler T. Hawk;William W. Hale;Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers;Wim Meeus

  • Mind your own business! Longitudinal relations between perceived privacy invasion and adolescent-parent conflict.

    Skyler T. Hawk;Loes Keijsers;William W. Hale Iii;Wim Meeus

  • Narcissistic adolescents' attention-seeking following social rejection: Links with social media disclosure, problematic social media use, and smartphone stress

    Skyler T. Hawk;Regina J.J.M. van den Eijnden;Caspar J. van Lissa;Tom F.M. ter Bogt

  • Can't buy me friendship? Peer rejection and adolescent materialism: Implicit self-esteem as a mediator

    Jiang Jiang;Yan Zhang;Yan Zhang;Yannan Ke;Skyler T. Hawk

  • Face the noise: Embodied responses to nonverbal vocalizations of discrete emotions

    Skyler T. Hawk;Agneta H. Fischer;Gerben A. Van Kleef

  • Taking your place or matching your face: two paths to empathic embarrassment.

    Skyler T. Hawk;Agneta H. Fischer;Gerben A. Van Kleef

  • Personal and Social Facets of Job Identity: A Person-Centered Approach

    Elisabetta Crocetti;Lorenzo Avanzi;Skyler T. Hawk;Franco Fraccaroli

  • The longitudinal interplay of affective and cognitive empathy within and between adolescents and mothers.

    Caspar J. van Lissa;Skyler T. Hawk;Minet de Wied;Hans M. Koot

  • Maternal criticism and adolescent depressive and generalized anxiety disorder symptoms: a 6-year longitudinal community study.

    Stefanie A. Nelemans;William W. Hale;Susan J. T. Branje;Skyler T. Hawk

  • The role of siblings in identity development in adolescence and emerging adulthood

    Thessa M.L. Wong;Susan J.T. Branje;Inge E. VanderValk;Skyler T. Hawk

  • "I still haven't found what I'm looking for": parental privacy invasion predicts reduced parental knowledge

    Skyler T. Hawk;Loes Keijsers;Tom Frijns;William W. Hale Iii

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University
Susan Branje
Susan Branje Utrecht University
Loes Keijsers
Loes Keijsers Erasmus University Rotterdam
William W. Hale
William W. Hale Utrecht University
Hans M. Koot
Hans M. Koot Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Pol A. C. van Lier
Pol A. C. van Lier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The growing demand for mental health professionals has made studying psychology and related fields more appealing than ever. Many students choose to pursue online degrees to gain flexibility and balance their personal commitments while building relevant skills. Online psychology programs can prepare graduates for a range of career pathways, including becoming a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT).

If you are interested in this rewarding career, it’s essential to understand state-specific licensing requirements. In-depth guides outline the mft requirements in Jersey City, as well as Kansas City mft education requirements. These often include completing a master’s degree in marriage and family therapy or related fields, supervised clinical experience, and passing professional exams.

Aspiring therapists should also review local requirements such as how to become an mft in Laredo and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Las Vegas. These resources provide tailored insights on accreditation, coursework, and practical experience, helping you begin your career with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Skyler T. Hawk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles