World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
97
Citations
51982
World Ranking
1720
National Ranking
108

Alan J. Barrett publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 238 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Alan J. Barrett D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Enzyme
  • Gene
  • Amino acid

Alan J. Barrett spends much of his time researching Biochemistry, Chromatography, Cysteine, Proteolytic enzymes and Molecular biology. All of his Biochemistry and Cathepsin B and Papain investigations are sub-components of the entire Biochemistry study. His work carried out in the field of Papain brings together such families of science as Endopeptidase, Reagent and Sulfation.

His Chromatography research incorporates themes from Glycosaminoglycan, Gel electrophoresis and Substrate. The various areas that Alan J. Barrett examines in his Proteolytic enzymes study include MEROPS, Peptide Hydrolases, A protein and Protein species. His Molecular biology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Astacin and Thimet oligopeptidase.

His most cited work include:

  • Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue (2973 citations)
  • Handbook of proteolytic enzymes (2280 citations)
  • MEROPS: the peptidase database (2154 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Biochemistry, Enzyme, Molecular biology, Cysteine and Chromatography. His work in the fields of Biochemistry, such as Peptide sequence, Papain and Cathepsin B, intersects with other areas such as Cystatin and Legumain. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Enzyme, Amino acid and Thimet oligopeptidase is strongly linked to Stereochemistry.

He has researched Molecular biology in several fields, including Proteolytic enzymes and Cathepsin D. As part of the same scientific family, Alan J. Barrett usually focuses on Proteolytic enzymes, concentrating on Computational biology and intersecting with Peptidase Inhibitors. The Chromatography study combines topics in areas such as Reagent, Affinity chromatography, Chymopapain and Sepharose.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Biochemistry (67.05%)
  • Enzyme (23.86%)
  • Molecular biology (19.32%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1999-2018)?

  • Biochemistry (67.05%)
  • Proteolytic enzymes (11.93%)
  • MEROPS (6.25%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Alan J. Barrett mainly investigates Biochemistry, Proteolytic enzymes, MEROPS, Peptide sequence and Stereochemistry. In the field of Biochemistry, his study on Cysteine, Protease and Serine overlaps with subjects such as Legumain and Clan. His Proteolytic enzymes research includes elements of Genome, Eukaryote, Computational biology and Sequence alignment.

His studies in MEROPS integrate themes in fields like Conserved sequence and Bioinformatics. His Peptide sequence research incorporates elements of Residue, Molecular biology and In vivo. His study on Stereochemistry also encompasses disciplines like

  • Chymotrypsin which intersects with area such as Cysteine protease and Cathepsin B,
  • Amino acid that connect with fields like Thimet oligopeptidase,
  • Proteases that connect with fields like Cell biology.

Between 1999 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors (1194 citations)
  • Evolutionary families of peptidase inhibitors. (486 citations)
  • The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database (482 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Enzyme
  • Gene
  • Amino acid

His scientific interests lie mostly in Biochemistry, Proteolytic enzymes, MEROPS, Peptide sequence and Cleavage. His study looks at the relationship between Biochemistry and topics such as Computational biology, which overlap with Peptidase Inhibitors. Alan J. Barrett frequently studies issues relating to Clostripain and Proteolytic enzymes.

His multidisciplinary approach integrates MEROPS and Database in his work. His studies deal with areas such as Serine, Molecular mass, Complementary DNA, Molecular biology and Alanine as well as Asparagine. His Cysteine study combines topics in areas such as Papain, PA clan and Gelatinase A.

Best Publications

  • Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue

    Richard W. Farndale;David J. Buttle;Alan J. Barrett

  • Cathepsin B, Cathepsin H, and cathepsin L.

    Alan J. Barrett;Heidrun Kirschke

  • Handbook of proteolytic enzymes

    Alan J. Barrett;Neil D. Rawlings;J. F. Woessner

  • MEROPS: the peptidase database

    Neil D. Rawlings;Dominic P. Tolle;Alan J. Barrett

  • Twenty years of the MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors

    Neil D. Rawlings;Neil D. Rawlings;Alan J. Barrett;Alan J. Barrett;Robert D. Finn

  • A direct spectrophotometric microassay for sulfated glycosaminoglycans in cartilage cultures.

    Richard W. Farndale;Christine A. Sayers;Alan J. Barrett

  • The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database

    Neil D Rawlings;Alan J Barrett;Paul D Thomas;Xiaosong Huang

  • MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors

    Neil D. Rawlings;Alan J. Barrett;Alex Bateman

  • The interaction of α2-macroglobulin with proteinases. Characteristics and specificity of the reaction, and a hypothesis concerning its molecular mechanism

    Alan J. Barrett;Phyllis M. Starkey

  • Evolutionary families of peptidases

    N D Rawlings;A J Barrett

  • L-trans-Epoxysuccinyl-leucylamido(4-guanidino)butane (E-64) and its analogues as inhibitors of cysteine proteinases including cathepsins B, H and L

    A J Barrett;A A Kembhavi;M A Brown;H Kirschke

  • Evolutionary families of metallopeptidases.

    Neil D. Rawlings;Alan J. Barrett

  • Families of serine peptidases.

    Neil D. Rawlings;Alan J. Barrett

  • Proteinases in Mammalian Cells and Tissues

    Alan J. Barrett

  • Evolutionary families of peptidase inhibitors.

    Neil D. Rawlings;Dominic P. Tolle;Alan J. Barrett

  • Isolation of six cysteine proteinase inhibitors from human urine. Their physicochemical and enzyme kinetic properties and concentrations in biological fluids

    M Abrahamson;A J Barrett;G Salvesen;A Grubb

  • A new assay for cathepsin B1 and other thiol proteinases

    A.J. Barrett

  • Cathepsin B1. A lysosomal enzyme that degrades native collagen

    Mary C. Burleigh;Alan J. Barrett;Gerald S. Lazarus

  • Fluorimetric assays for cathepsin B and cathepsin H with methylcoumarylamide substrates

    A J Barrett

  • Families of cysteine peptidases.

    Neil D. Rawlings;Alan J. Barrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil D. Rawlings
Neil D. Rawlings European Bioinformatics Institute
David J. Buttle
David J. Buttle University of Sheffield
Vito Turk
Vito Turk Jožef Stefan Institute
Magnus Abrahamson
Magnus Abrahamson Lund University
Anders Grubb
Anders Grubb Lund University
Guy S. Salvesen
Guy S. Salvesen Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
Alex Bateman
Alex Bateman European Bioinformatics Institute
Andrew D. Rowan
Andrew D. Rowan Newcastle University
Werner Machleidt
Werner Machleidt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Gerald S. Lazarus
Gerald S. Lazarus Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to numerous online academic and career opportunities in the USA. Online learning offers flexibility and accessibility—making it easier for working professionals and busy students to advance in their fields.

If you’re interested in a foundational science degree, a bs in biology online can help you prepare for careers in research, education, healthcare, and more. For those aiming to enter the medical profession quickly, asn online nursing programs offer efficient pathways into nursing and patient care roles.

Nutrition is another growing area; consider enrolling in one of the best online nutrition programs if you’re interested in food science, wellness, or public health. For those seeking leadership positions in healthcare administration, cahme-accredited online mha programs provide advanced business and management training specifically for healthcare settings.

With so many online degree and certification options available, it’s easier than ever to align your education with your chosen career pathway in the life sciences and healthcare industries.

Best Scientists Citing Alan J. Barrett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles