World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
31
Citations
3515
World Ranking
8968
National Ranking
647

Joseph Doetsch publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Doetsch sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 191 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Joseph Doetsch D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Doetsch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph Doetsch is affiliated with Lufthansa Industry Solutions in Germany and conducts research primarily in Earth and Planetary Sciences, Engineering, and Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Mechanical Engineering, and Environmental Engineering.

Their research contributions focus heavily on seismic imaging and inversion techniques, seismic waves and analysis, and geophysical methods and applications. Other significant topics include earthquake and tectonic studies, hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, groundwater flow and contamination studies, as well as quantum computing algorithms and architecture.

Doetsch has authored a number of research papers published in reputable scientific venues. Notable publications include:

  • Characterizing a decametre-scale granitic reservoir using ground-penetrating radar and seismic methods, 2020, Solid Earth
  • Empirical Investigations of the Instrument Response for Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) across 17 Octaves, 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock, 2020, Solid Earth
  • Hydromechanical processes and their influence on the stimulation effected volume: observations from a decameter-scale hydraulic stimulation project, 2020, Solid Earth
  • In situ observation of helium and argon release during fluid-pressure-triggered rock deformation, 2020, Scientific Reports

Their frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborative research efforts. These include Mohammadreza Jalali, Linus Villiger, Valentin Gischig, Hannes Krietsch, and Florian Amann.

The venues where Doetsch commonly publishes are Solid Earth, arXiv (Cornell University), Geophysical Research Letters, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, and Geophysics.

Best Publications

  • The seismo-hydromechanical behavior during deep geothermal reservoir stimulations: open questions tackled in a decameter-scale in situ stimulation experiment

    Florian Amann;Florian Amann;Valentin Gischig;Keith Evans;Joseph Doetsch

  • Zonation for 3D aquifer characterization based on joint inversions of multimethod crosshole geophysical data

    Joseph Doetsch;Niklas Linde;Ilaria Coscia;Stewart A. Greenhalgh

  • Full-waveform inversion of cross-hole ground-penetrating radar data to characterize a gravel aquifer close to the Thur River, Switzerland

    Anja Klotzsche;Jan van der Kruk;Giovanni Angelo Meles;Joseph Doetsch

  • Constraining 3-D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization

    Joseph Doetsch;Niklas Linde;Mirco Pessognelli;Alan G. Green

  • Image-guided inversion of electrical resistivity data

    J. Zhou;A. Revil;A. Revil;M. Karaoulis;D. Hale

  • High-resolution characterization of a CO2 plume using crosswell seismic tomography: Cranfield, MS, USA

    J.B. Ajo-Franklin;J. Peterson;J. Doetsch;T.M. Daley

  • Imaging and quantifying salt-tracer transport in a riparian groundwater system by means of 3D ERT monitoring

    Joseph Doetsch;Niklas Linde;Tobias Vogt;Andrew Binley

  • 3D crosshole ERT for aquifer characterization and monitoring of infiltrating river water

    Ilaria Coscia;Stewart A. Greenhalgh;Niklas Linde;Joseph Doetsch

  • Empirical Investigations of the Instrument Response for Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) across 17 Octaves

    Patrick Paitz;Pascal Edme;Dominik Gräff;Fabian Walter

  • Hydraulic stimulation and fluid circulation experiments in underground laboratories: Stepping up the scale towards engineered geothermal systems

    Valentin S. Gischig;Domenico Giardini;Florian Amann;Marian Hertrich

  • 3-D characterization of high-permeability zones in a gravel aquifer using 2-D crosshole GPR full-waveform inversion and waveguide detection

    Anja Klotzsche;Jan van der Kruk;Niklas Linde;Joseph Doetsch

  • Structural joint inversion of time‐lapse crosshole ERT and GPR traveltime data

    Joseph Doetsch;Nicklas Linde;Andrew Binley

  • Fracture imaging within a granitic rock aquifer using multiple-offset single-hole and cross-hole GPR reflection data

    Caroline Dorn;Niklas Linde;Joseph Doetsch;Tanguy Le Borgne

  • Towards improved instrumentation for assessing river-groundwater interactions in a restored river corridor

    Philipp Schneider;Philipp Schneider;Tobias Vogt;Mario Schirmer;Joseph Doetsch

  • The borehole-fluid effect in electrical resistivity imaging

    Joseph A. Doetsch;Ilaria Coscia;Stewart Greenhalgh;Niklas Linde

  • Imaging subsurface migration of dissolved CO2 in a shallow aquifer using 3-D time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography

    Esben Auken;Joseph Doetsch;Gianluca Fiandaca;Anders Vest Christiansen

  • On the link between stress field and small-scale hydraulic fracture growth in anisotropic rock derived from microseismicity

    Valentin Samuel Gischig;Joseph Doetsch;Hansruedi Maurer;Hannes Krietsch

  • Direct current (DC) resistivity and induced polarization (IP) monitoring of active layer dynamics at high temporal resolution

    Joseph Doetsch;Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen;Anders V. Christiansen;Gianluca Fiandaca

  • Stress Measurements for an In Situ Stimulation Experiment in Crystalline Rock: Integration of Induced Seismicity, Stress Relief and Hydraulic Methods

    Hannes Krietsch;Valentin Gischig;Keith Evans;Joseph Doetsch

  • Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock

    Linus Villiger;Valentin Samuel Gischig;Joseph Doetsch;Hannes Krietsch

  • Transmissivity Changes and Microseismicity Induced by Small-Scale Hydraulic Fracturing Tests in Crystalline Rock

    Mohammadreza Jalali;Valentin Gischig;Joseph Doetsch;Rico Näf

Frequent Co-Authors

Florian Amann
Florian Amann RWTH Aachen University
Niklas Linde
Niklas Linde University of Lausanne
Stefan Wiemer
Stefan Wiemer Swiss Seismological Service
Alan G. Green
Alan G. Green ETH Zurich
Keith F. Evans
Keith F. Evans ETH Zurich
Thomas Günther
Thomas Günther Leibniz Association
Esben Auken
Esben Auken Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse educational and career opportunities. For those seeking flexible learning options, especially older adults, the best degrees for older adults highlight programs tailored to accommodate different life stages and schedules.

In addition to Earth Science, interdisciplinary fields like Library Science offer viable career shifts or enhancements. The ala mlis programs provide accredited online options for those interested in knowledge management and research, showing how education can complement scientific pursuits.

Many wonder whether pursuing advanced degrees is worthwhile. Insights from the is a masters in library science worth it article shed light on balancing investment with potential career benefits—a useful perspective for prospective Earth Science students weighing further specialization.

Creative pathways also intersect with scientific fields. For example, capturing the Earth's phenomena through imagery links to digital arts, with programs like the digital photography degree online offering affordable options to develop complementary skills.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph Doetsch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles