World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
28
Citations
8945
World Ranking
1313
National Ranking
653

Matthew Gabel publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Gabel sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 121 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Matthew Gabel D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Gabel sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 28 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew Gabel is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including political science, economics, public health, psychiatry, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist has contributed extensively to several topics, including:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Matthew Gabel include:

  • Clifford J. Carrubba
  • Caitlin Ainsley
  • Brian F. Crisp
  • Betul Demirkaya
  • Dino Hadzic

The main venues where this researcher has published are:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • American Political Science Review

Selected recent publications by Matthew Gabel cover topics in both political science and medical research, reflecting their interdisciplinary scope:

  • Roll-Call Vote Selection: Implications for the Study of Legislative Politics, 2020, American Political Science Review
  • Retaining Participants in Longitudinal Studies of Alzheimer's Disease, 2022, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Perceptions of Research Burden and Retention Among Participants in ADRC Cohorts, 2022, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
  • The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research, 2021, Scientific Reports

These publications highlight an ongoing interest in the mechanics of voting and legislative behavior, as well as issues surrounding retention and ethical concerns in longitudinal studies related to Alzheimer's disease.

The scientist's work incorporates analytical methods from economics and political science, applied to understanding electoral systems and legislative politics, as well as public health research focusing on dementia and Alzheimer's disease cohorts.

Best Publications

  • Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories

    Matthew Gabel

  • Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union

    Matthew Joseph Gabel

  • Understanding variation in public support for European integration

    Matthew Gabel;Harvey D. Palmer

  • Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data

    Matthew J. Gabel;John D. Huber

  • Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice

    Clifford J. Carrubba;Matthew Gabel;Charles Hankla

  • Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias and Roll-Call Vote Analysis

    Clifford J. Carrubba;Matthew Gabel;Lacey Murrah;Ryan Clough

  • Economic Conditions, Economic Perceptions, and Public Support for European Integration

    Matthew Gabel;Guy D. Whitten

  • Interests and Integration

    Unknown

  • Defining the Eu Political Space: An Empirical Study of the European Elections Manifestos, 1979-1999

    Matthew Gabel;Simon Hix

  • Economic Integration and Mass Politics: Market Liberalization and Public Attitudes in the European Union

    Matthew J. Gabel

  • Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables

    Matthew Gabel;Kenneth Scheve

  • Legislative Voting Behavior, Seen and Unseen: A Theory of Roll-Call Vote Selection

    Clifford Carrubba;Matthew Gabel;Simon Hug

  • European integration, voters and national politics

    Matthew Gabel

  • The Structure of Citizen Attitudes and the European Political Space

    Matthew J. Gabel;Christopher J. Anderson

  • Mixed Messages: Party Dissent and Mass Opinion on European Integration

    Matthew Gabel;Kenneth Scheve

  • International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements: A General Theory with Evidence from the European Union

    Clifford J. Carrubba;Matthew J. Gabel

  • The Endurance of Supranational Governance: A Consociational Interpretation of the European Union

    Matthew J. Gabel

  • Temporoparietal hypometabolism in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and associated imaging diagnostic errors.

    Kyle B. Womack;Ramon Diaz-Arrastia;Howard J. Aizenstein;Steven E. Arnold

  • Understanding the Role of the European Court of Justice in European Integration

    Clifford J. Carruba;Matthew Gabel;Charles Hankla

  • Understanding Public Support for British Membership of the Single Currency

    Matthew Gabel;Simon Hix

  • “Roll-Call Votes and Party Discipline in the European Parliament: Reconsidering MEP Voting Behavior”

    Clifford Carrubba;Matthew. Gabel

  • A social choice approach to expert consensus panels.

    Matthew J. Gabel;Charles R. Shipan

  • European Union Politics : Editorial Statement

    Gerald Schneider;Matthew Gabel;Simon Hix

  • European Integration and Political Conflict: The structure of citizen attitudes and the European political space

    Matthew J. Gabel;Christopher J. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Clifford J. Carrubba
Clifford J. Carrubba Emory University
Simon Hix
Simon Hix European University Institute
John C. Morris
John C. Morris Washington University in St. Louis
Kenneth Scheve
Kenneth Scheve University of Notre Dame
Christopher J. Anderson
Christopher J. Anderson London School of Economics and Political Science
R. Scott Turner
R. Scott Turner Georgetown University
Norman L. Foster
Norman L. Foster University of Utah
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
Elaine R. Peskind
Elaine R. Peskind University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens a variety of doors for career advancement and specialization. Many students choose to supplement their degree with certificate programs that pay well. These certificates can boost your credentials quickly, making you more competitive in government, public policy, or non-profit sectors.

If you wish to advance your education further, you might consider enrolling in one of the quickest masters degree online options available. These accelerated programs let you gain advanced skills in less time, helping you move faster into leadership and analytical roles.

Affordability is also key when planning your academic path. There are many cheap online classes that allow you to save money while meeting degree requirements or exploring new interests alongside Political Science.

Lastly, Political Science graduates often pursue careers overlapping with other fields. For example, combining political studies with education or environmental policy could lead to positions highlighted in jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree salary us. These interdisciplinary roles continue to grow as public policy evolves.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Gabel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles