World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
10844
World Ranking
17931
National Ranking
7339

R. Scott Turner publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Scott Turner sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 90 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

R. Scott Turner D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Scott Turner sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Scott Turner is affiliated with Georgetown University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their research predominantly centers on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, with a significant focus on clinical and biomarker studies.

Their work is published mainly in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Annals of Neurology
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Turner's research covers a broad spectrum of subfields including physiology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and molecular biology.

The main topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms
  • Chronic myeloid leukemia treatments
  • Health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life
  • Health, environment, and cognitive aging

Some of their recent published papers are:

  • Two Phase 3 Trials of Gantenerumab in Early Alzheimer's Disease, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities With Anti-amyloid Antibodies for the Treatment of Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease, 2022, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Nilotinib Effects on Safety, Tolerability, and Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • Potential New Approaches for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias, 2020, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Amyloid and tau-PET in early-onset AD: Baseline data from the Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS), 2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Dustin B. Hammers
  • Alireza Atri
  • Ani Eloyan
  • Jeffrey L. Dage
  • Kelly Nudelman

Best Publications

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of resveratrol for Alzheimer disease

    R. Scott Turner;Ronald G. Thomas;Suzanne Craft;Christopher H. van Dyck

  • FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

    Norman L. Foster;Judith L. Heidebrink;Christopher M. Clark;William J. Jagust

  • Resveratrol regulates neuro-inflammation and induces adaptive immunity in Alzheimer's disease.

    Charbel Moussa;Michaeline Hebron;Xu Huang;Jaeil Ahn

  • In vivo radioligand binding to translocator protein correlates with severity of Alzheimer’s disease

    William C. Kreisl;Chul Hyoung Lyoo;Meghan McGwier;Joseph Snow

  • Phospholipid-sensitive Ca2+-dependent protein kinase from heart. II. Substrate specificity and inhibition by various agents.

    B. C. Wise;D. B. Glass;C. H. J. Chou;R. L. Raynor

  • The X11α Protein Slows Cellular Amyloid Precursor Protein Processing and Reduces Aβ40 and Aβ42 Secretion

    Jean-Paul Borg;Yunning Yang;Mylène De Taddéo-Borg;Ben Margolis

  • ApoE4 Decreases Spine Density and Dendritic Complexity in Cortical Neurons In Vivo

    Sonya B. Dumanis;Joseph A. Tesoriero;Lenard W. Babus;Madeline T. Nguyen

  • Resveratrol for Alzheimer's disease

    Christine Sawda;Charbel Moussa;R. Scott Turner

  • IDENTIFICATION OF AN EVOLUTIONARILY CONSERVED HETEROTRIMERIC PROTEIN COMPLEX INVOLVED IN PROTEIN TARGETING

    Jean Paul Borg;Samuel W. Straight;Susan M. Kaech;Mylène De Taddéo-Borg

  • The Chaperone BiP/GRP78 Binds to Amyloid Precursor Protein and Decreases Aβ40 and Aβ42 Secretion

    Yunning Yang;R. Scott Turner;James R. Gaut

  • Amyloids and Are Generated Intracellularly in Cultured Human Neurons and Their Secretion Increases with Maturation

    R. Scott Turner;Nobuhiro Suzuki;Abraham S.C. Chyung;Steven G. Younkin

  • Adaptor protein interactions: modulators of amyloid precursor protein metabolism and Alzheimer's disease risk?

    Gwendalyn D. King;R. Scott Turner;R. Scott Turner

  • Cognitive Impairment in Older Patients With Breast Cancer Before Systemic Therapy: Is There an Interaction Between Cancer and Comorbidity?

    Jeanne S. Mandelblatt;Robert A. Stern;Gheorghe Luta;Meghan McGuckin

  • X11 Interaction with β-Amyloid Precursor Protein Modulates Its Cellular Stabilization and Reduces Amyloid β-Protein Secretion

    Magdalena Sastre;R. Scott Turner;Efrat Levy

  • Overexpression of hAPPswe impairs rewarded alternation and contextual fear conditioning in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Kevin A. Corcoran;Ye Lu;R. Scott Turner;R. Scott Turner;Stephen Maren

  • Phospholipid-sensitive Ca2+-dependent protein kinase: a major protein phosphorylation system

    J.F. Kuo;Randall C. Schatzman;R.Scott Turner;Gonzalo J. Mazzei

  • (11)C-PBR28 binding to translocator protein increases with progression of Alzheimer's disease.

    William C. Kreisl;Chul Hyoung Lyoo;Jeih San Liow;Monica Wei

  • Cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition reduces amyloid pathology and improves memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Sang Ho Choi;Saba Aid;Luca Caracciolo;S. Sakura Minami

  • Mercaptoacetamide-based class II HDAC inhibitor lowers Aβ levels and improves learning and memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    You Me Sung;Taehee Lee;Hyejin Yoon;Amanda Marie DiBattista

Frequent Co-Authors

J.F. Kuo
J.F. Kuo Emory University
Christopher M. Clark
Christopher M. Clark University of Pennsylvania
Steven E. Arnold
Steven E. Arnold Harvard University
G. William Rebeck
G. William Rebeck Georgetown University Medical Center
Norman L. Foster
Norman L. Foster University of Utah
Robert A. Koeppe
Robert A. Koeppe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Robert B. Innis
Robert B. Innis National Institutes of Health
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up a range of exciting career options and online learning opportunities. Many students explore the dynamic field of health information management and medical coding, where the demand for skilled professionals is rising. If you’re interested in this path, it’s useful to explore the medical coding salary to understand earning potential and how it compares with similar roles.

The medical billing and coding outlook also highlights the pros and cons of this career, helping you decide if it’s the right fit. Those seeking flexible learning can consider health information management online programs to build expertise while balancing other commitments.

Beyond coding and information management, many Biology and Biochemistry grads pursue work in nutrition. There are accessible options to further your studies, such as online degrees in nutrition that can boost your credentials and career prospects. Each of these pathways offers diverse options for specialization in the digital age.

Best Scientists Citing R. Scott Turner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles