World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
33549
World Ranking
1655
National Ranking
809

Norman L. Foster publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman L. Foster sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 271 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Norman L. Foster D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman L. Foster sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norman L. Foster is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and focuses on research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas with an emphasis on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, and other related subjects such as Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics, Noise Effects and Management, Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and Frailty in Older Adults.

Norman L. Foster has contributed to multiple papers published in notable venues. These include:

  • 18F-FDG PET Imaging in Neurodegenerative Dementing Disorders: Insights into Subtype Classification, Emerging Disease Categories, and Mixed Dementia with Copathologies, 2022, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Evaluating the Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Cognitive Function in Older Adults, 2021, The Laryngoscope
  • Overall and sex-specific risk factors for subjective cognitive decline: findings from the 2015-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey, 2022, Biology of Sex Differences
  • The RSNA QIBA Profile for Amyloid PET as an Imaging Biomarker for Cerebral Amyloid Quantification, 2022, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Toward a Universal Readout for18F-Labeled Amyloid Tracers: The CAPTAINs Study, 2021, Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Frequently, Norman L. Foster has collaborated with coauthors such as Richard K. Gurgel, Karen C. Schliep, Michael W. Varner, Satoshi Minoshima, and Ken R. Smith. The research contributions often appear in journals like the Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Innovation in Aging, The Laryngoscope, Biology of Sex Differences, and Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring.

Best Publications

  • Metabolic Reduction in the Posterior Cingulate Cortex in Very Early Alzheimer's Disease

    Saroshi Minoshima;Bruno Giordani;Stanley Berent;Kirk A. Frey

  • A Diagnostic Approach in Alzheimer's Disease Using Three-Dimensional Stereotactic Surface Projections of Fluorine-18-FDG PET

    Satoshi Minoshima;Kirk A. Frey;Kirk A. Frey;Robert A. Koeppe;Norman L. Foster

  • Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer's Association.

    Keith A. Johnson;Satoshi Minoshima;Nicolaas I. Bohnen;Kevin J. Donohoe

  • A 30-Week Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Dose Tacrine in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

    Margaret J. Knapp;David S. Knopman;Paul R. Solomon;William W. Pendlebury

  • Mild cognitive impairment can be distinguished from Alzheimer disease and normal aging for clinical trials.

    Michael Grundman;Ronald C. Petersen;Steven H. Ferris;Ronald G. Thomas

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • The Uniform Data Set (UDS): clinical and cognitive variables and descriptive data from Alzheimer Disease Centers.

    John C. Morris;Sandra Weintraub;Helena C. Chui;Jeffrey Cummings

  • The Alzheimer's Disease Centers' Uniform Data Set (UDS): the neuropsychologic test battery.

    Sandra Weintraub;David Salmon;Nathaniel Mercaldo;Steven Ferris

  • Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI

    Susan M. Landau;Danielle J Harvey;Cindee M. Madison;Robert A. Koeppe

  • Consensus report of the working group on: 'Molecular and biochemical markers of Alzheimer's disease'

    Peter Davies;Judith Resnick;Burton Resnick;Sid Gilman

  • Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: A consensus conference

    Norman L. Foster;Kirk C. Wilhelmsen;Anders A. F. Sima;Anders A. F. Sima;Margaret Z. Jones

  • Alzheimer's disease: Focal cortical changes shown by positron emission tomography

    Norman L. Foster;Thomas N. Chase;Paul Fedio;Nicholas J. Patronas

  • Comparing predictors of conversion and decline in mild cognitive impairment

    S. M. Landau;Danielle J Harvey;C. M. Madison;E. M. Reiman

  • FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

    Norman L. Foster;Judith L. Heidebrink;Christopher M. Clark;William J. Jagust

  • Alzheimer's disease versus Dementia with Lewy bodies : Cerebral metabolic distinction with autopsy confirmation

    Satoshi Minoshima;Norman L. Foster;Anders A. F. Sima;Kirk A. Frey

  • The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative positron emission tomography core

    William J. Jagust;William J. Jagust;Dan Bandy;Kewei Chen;Norman L. Foster

  • In vivo mapping of cholinergic terminals in normal aging, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease

    D. E. Kuhl;S. Minoshima;J. A. Fessler;K. A. Frey;K. A. Frey

  • Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia.

    William J. Jagust;S. M. Landau;L. M. Shaw;J. Q. Trojanowski

  • Cortical abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease

    N. L. Foster;T. N. Chase;L. Mansi;R. Brooks

  • Mild Cognitive Impairments Predict Dementia in Nondemented Elderly Patients With Memory Loss

    Andrea Bozoki;Bruno Giordani;Judith L. Heidebrink;Stanley Berent

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Koeppe
Robert A. Koeppe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Eric M. Reiman
Eric M. Reiman Arizona State University
Satoshi Minoshima
Satoshi Minoshima University of Utah
Michael W. Weiner
Michael W. Weiner University of California, San Francisco
Kewei Chen
Kewei Chen Arizona State University
David E. Kuhl
David E. Kuhl University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stanley Berent
Stanley Berent University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bruno Giordani
Bruno Giordani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kirk A. Frey
Kirk A. Frey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Norman L. Foster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles