World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
19406
World Ranking
3727
National Ranking
1304

Mark E. Ritchie publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Ritchie sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark E. Ritchie D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Ritchie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Ritchie is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States and specializes in environmental science with a focus on agricultural and biological sciences. Their research spans several subfields, including ecology, global and planetary change, management, monitoring, policy and law, nature and landscape conservation, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The primary topics covered in their work include rangeland management and livestock ecology, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, wildlife ecology and conservation, fire effects on ecosystems, rangeland and wildlife management, plant and animal studies, and plant parasitism and resistance.

Mark E. Ritchie's recent publications reflect a strong engagement with these themes. Their recent papers include:

  • "Savanna fire management can generate enough carbon revenue to help restore Africa's rangelands and fill protected area funding gaps" (2021, One Earth)
  • "Savannas are vital but overlooked carbon sinks" (2022, Science)
  • "Large herbivores facilitate a dominant grassland forb via multiple indirect effects" (2022, Ecology)
  • "Grazing Management, Forage Production and Soil Carbon Dynamics" (2020, Resources)
  • "Episodic herbivory, plant density dependence, and stimulation of aboveground plant production" (2020, Ecology and Evolution)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Mark E. Ritchie include Neha Mohanbabu, Timothy H. Tear, Nicholas H. Wolff, Natasha Ribeiro, and Lisanne S. Petracca.

Their publications appear predominantly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), One Earth, Science, and Ecology. BioRxiv features the highest number of their publications.

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes

    David Tilman;Johannes Knops;David Wedin;Peter Reich

  • Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity.

    Han Olff;Mark E. Ritchie

  • Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity

    Johannes M.H. Knops;David Tilman;Nick M. Haddad;Shahid Naeem

  • Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review

    Megan E. McSherry;Mark E. Ritchie

  • Experimental Tests of the Dependence of Arthropod Diversity on Plant Diversity

    Evan Siemann;Evan Siemann;David Tilman;John Haarstad;Mark Ritchie

  • Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in oak Savanna

    Mark E. Ritchie;David Tilman;Johannes M. H. Knops

  • Contrasting Effects of Plant Richness and Composition on Insect Communities: A Field Experiment

    Nick M. Haddad;David Tilman;John Haarstad;Mark Ritchie

  • Herbivore impact on grassland plant diversity depends on habitat productivity and herbivore size.

    Elisabeth S. Bakker;Mark E. Ritchie;Han Olff;Daniel G. Milchunas

  • Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services

    Katharina A. M. Engelhardt;Katharina A. M. Engelhardt;Mark E. Ritchie

  • Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities

    James B. Grace;T. Michael Anderson;Melinda D. Smith;Eric W. Seabloom

  • Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity

    Mark E. Ritchie;Han Olff

  • Global environmental controls of diversity in large herbivores.

    Han Olff;Mark E. Ritchie;Herbert H.T. Prins

  • Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges

    John P. Haskell;Mark E. Ritchie;Han Olff

  • A Disease-Mediated Trophic Cascade in the Serengeti and its Implications for Ecosystem C

    Ricardo M. Holdo;Anthony R. E. Sinclair;Andrew P. Dobson;Kristine L. Metzger

  • On Theory in Ecology

    Pablo A. Marquet;Andrew P. Allen;James H. Brown;Jennifer A. Dunne

  • Cross-boundary human impacts compromise the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem

    Michiel P. Veldhuis;Mark E. Ritchie;Joseph O. Ogutu;Thomas A. Morrison

  • Animating the Carbon Cycle

    Oswald J. Schmitz;Peter A. Raymond;James A. Estes;Werner A. Kurz

  • NITROGEN LIMITATION AND TROPHIC VS. ABIOTIC INFLUENCES ON INSECT HERBIVORES IN A TEMPERATE GRASSLAND

    Mark E. Ritchie

  • Fragmented nature: consequences for biodiversity

    Han Olff;Mark E. Ritchie

  • Introduced grazers can restrict potential soil carbon sequestration through impacts on plant community composition.

    Sumanta Bagchi;Mark E. Ritchie

  • Evidence for shared broad-scale climatic niches of diploid and polyploid plants.

    K. L. Glennon;K. L. Glennon;M. E. Ritchie;K. A. Segraves

Frequent Co-Authors

David Tilman
David Tilman University of Minnesota
Johannes M. H. Knops
Johannes M. H. Knops Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
Han Olff
Han Olff University of Groningen
John R. Dolan
John R. Dolan Université Paris Cité
T. Michael Anderson
T. Michael Anderson Wake Forest University
Evan Siemann
Evan Siemann Rice University
Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Gary E. Belovsky
Gary E. Belovsky University of Notre Dame
John A. Bissonette
John A. Bissonette Utah State University
Nicholas H. Wolff
Nicholas H. Wolff The Nature Conservancy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to a diverse range of online degrees and fast-track career options. Many students seek flexible programs that let them balance education with other commitments, making online learning a popular choice.

For example, students looking to advance quickly may consider programs such as the rn to bsn in 6 months, designed for rapid upskilling. Those who already hold an Associate Degree in Nursing can move toward advanced clinical roles through rn to np programs online, opening opportunities in healthcare leadership and specialized practice.

Individuals without a traditional nursing background also have options, such as direct entry msn programs. These offer a pathway for those with a bachelor’s in another field to transition directly into nursing, a model that can inspire parallel routes in other scientific disciplines.

Choosing the right institution is critical for career growth. Comparing programs—like which school is better snhu vs wgu—helps ensure you select a school that matches your needs, whether your focus is on healthcare, research, or environmental policy.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Ritchie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles