World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
51
Citations
11938
World Ranking
2490
National Ranking
1231

Craig W. Beattie publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig W. Beattie sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 154 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Craig W. Beattie D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig W. Beattie sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Craig W. Beattie is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics in Medicine, with significant focus on subfields such as Surgery, Nephrology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work spans several key topics including Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy, Renal function and acid-base balance, and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms.

Recent publications attributed to Beattie include:

  • A-349 Evaluation of i-STAT® Point of Care Blood Gas Cartridges and Competitor Blood Gas Devices Against Reference Standard for PCO2 and PO2, 2024, Clinical Chemistry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Beattie are:

  • Linda Thibodeau
  • James V. Dunford
  • Isabelle Thibodeau
  • M Gonzalez Aguirre
  • P. Pozzobon

The majority of Beattie's work has been published in the journal Clinical Chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution

    Martien A. M. Groenen;Alan L. Archibald;Hirohide Uenishi;Christopher K. Tuggle

  • A genetic linkage map for cattle.

    M. D. Bishop;S. M. Kappes;J. W. Keele;R. T. Stone

  • A second-generation linkage map of the bovine genome.

    Steven M. Kappes;John W. Keele;Roger T. Stone;Royal A. McGraw

  • A comprehensive map of the porcine genome.

    Gary A. Rohrer;Leeson J. Alexander;Zhiliang Hu;Timothy P L Smith

  • Construction of a whole-genome radiation hybrid panel for high-resolution gene mapping in pigs.

    M. Yerle;P. Pinton;A. Robic;A. Alfonso

  • A microsatellite linkage map of the porcine genome.

    Gary A. Rohrer;Leeson J. Alexander;John W. Keele;Tim P. Smith

  • A first-generation porcine whole-genome radiation hybrid map.

    Rachel J. Hawken;Jeremy Murtaugh;Gail H. Flickinger;Martine Yerle

  • IMpRH Server: an RH mapping server available on the Web

    Denis Milan;Rachel Hawken;Cédric Cabau;Sophie Leroux

  • A Comprehensive Genetic Map of the Cattle Genome Based on 3802 Microsatellites

    Naoya Ihara;Akiko Takasuga;Kazunori Mizoshita;Haruko Takeda

  • A second-generation linkage map of the sheep genome.

    Maurico J. de Gortari;Brad A. Freking;Rachel P. Cuthbertson;Steven M. Kappes

  • Swine in biomedical research: creating the building blocks of animal models.

    Lawrence B. Schook;Craig W. Beattie;Jonathan Beever;Sharon M. Donovan

  • Phase I trial of p28 (NSC745104), a non-HDM2-mediated peptide inhibitor of p53 ubiquitination in pediatric patients with recurrent or progressive central nervous system tumors: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Study

    Rishi R. Lulla;Stewart Goldman;Tohru Yamada;Craig W. Beattie

  • A small-insert bovine genomic library highly enriched for microsatellite repeat sequences

    R. T. Stone;J. C. Pulido;G. M. Duyk;S. M. Kappes

  • Interval mapping of growth in divergent swine cross

    A. Albert Paszek;Patricia J. Wilkie;Gail H. Flickinger;Gary A. Rohrer

  • Evaluation of the ovine callipyge locus: I. Relative chromosomal position and gene action.

    B. A. Freking;J. W. Keele;C. W. Beattie;S. M. Kappes

  • Cloning and characterization of 414 polymorphic porcine microsatellites

    L J Alexander;G A Rohrer;C W Beattie

  • A first-generation EST RH comparative map of the porcine and human genome

    Anette Rink;Elizabeth M. Santschi;Katie M. Eyer;Benjamin Roelofs

  • A comprehensive radiation hybrid map of the bovine genome comprising 5593 loci.

    Tomohito Itoh;Toshio Watanabe;Naoya Ihara;Paola Mariani

  • Development of a bovine X chromosome linkage group and painting probes to assess cattle, sheep, and goat X chromosome segment homologies

    F. A. Ponce De Leon;Sakthikumar Ambady;G. A. Hawkins;S. M. Kappes

  • Physical assignments of 68 porcine cosmid and lambda clones containing polymorphic microsatellites

    L. J. Alexander;D. L. Troyer;G. A. Rohrer;T. P. L. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary A. Rohrer
Gary A. Rohrer Agricultural Research Service
Timothy P. L. Smith
Timothy P. L. Smith Agricultural Research Service
Tad S. Sonstegard
Tad S. Sonstegard Recombinetics (United States)
Lawrence B. Schook
Lawrence B. Schook University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John W. Keele
John W. Keele Agricultural Research Service
Michael P. Murtaugh
Michael P. Murtaugh University of Minnesota
Yoshikazu Sugimoto
Yoshikazu Sugimoto Keio University
Wei Shou Hu
Wei Shou Hu University of Minnesota
Gary L. Bennett
Gary L. Bennett Agricultural Research Service
Harris A. Lewin
Harris A. Lewin University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your studies beyond molecular biology can open up new career prospects and complement your scientific expertise. For example, if you’re passionate about healthcare and community support, a human services online program could help you build a career in counseling, outreach, or social services.

Some molecular biology graduates find opportunities in education or communication, and later decide to specialize further. Transitioning from teaching to allied healthcare roles is increasingly popular—see how educators have successfully changed paths by exploring how to go from teacher to speech language pathologist.

A strong foundation in science often overlaps with skills utilized in other fields. Those interested in design and problem-solving may benefit from a architect online degree, blending creativity with technical knowledge.

Lastly, advanced analytics and statistical abilities are valuable in both research and industry. Pursuing a bachelor in mathematics online is a great way to enhance your analytical skillset and open doors to diverse technical pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Craig W. Beattie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles