World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
14727
World Ranking
9664
National Ranking
4264

Forbes D. Porter publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Forbes D. Porter sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 272 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Forbes D. Porter D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Forbes D. Porter sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Forbes D. Porter is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work primarily focuses on lysosomal storage disorders, genetics, and various subfields including physiology, molecular biology, epidemiology, and hematology.

The scientist's recent publications cover diverse topics in medical and biological research. Some of the notable papers include:

  • CLN3 is required for the clearance of glycerophosphodiesters from lysosomes, published in 2022 in Nature
  • Prevalence of Diabetes and Hypertension and Their Associated Risks for Poor Outcomes in Covid-19 Patients, published in 2020 in the Journal of the Endocrine Society
  • Person Ability Scores as an Alternative to Norm-Referenced Scores as Outcome Measures in Studies of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, published in 2020 in the American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
  • Disruption of Dhcr7 and Insig1/2 in cholesterol metabolism causes defects in bone formation and homeostasis through primary cilium formation, published in 2020 in Bone Research
  • Endocrine Conditions and COVID-19, published in 2020 in Hormone and Metabolic Research

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • An Dang
  • Christopher A. Wassif
  • Simona Bianconi
  • Nicole Y. Farhat
  • Audrey Thurm

Forbes D. Porter's work appears regularly in several publication venues, notably:

  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease

The scientist's main areas of study encompass:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader fields, their focus stretches across several subfields:

  • Physiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Hematology
  • Genetics

Their research topics include, but are not limited to:

  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
  • Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus

Best Publications

  • Lhx2, a LIM homeobox gene, is required for eye, forebrain, and definitive erythrocyte development.

    Forbes D. Porter;John Drago;Yang Xu;Surindar S. Cheema

  • The LIM homeobox gene Lhx9 is essential for mouse gonad formation.

    Ohad S. Birk;Delane E. Casiano;Christopher A. Wassif;Tiziana Cogliati

  • A defective response to Hedgehog signaling in disorders of cholesterol biosynthesis

    Michael K. Cooper;Christopher A. Wassif;Patrycja A. Krakowiak;Jussi Taipale

  • Defective placental vasculogenesis causes embryonic lethality in VHL-deficient mice.

    James R. Gnarra;Jerrold M. Ward;Forbes D. Porter;Joseph R. Wagner

  • Cholesterol Oxidation Products Are Sensitive and Specific Blood-Based Biomarkers for Niemann-Pick C1 Disease

    Forbes D. Porter;David E. Scherrer;Michael H. Lanier;S. Joshua Langmade

  • Intrathecal 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin decreases neurological disease progression in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1–2 trial

    Daniel S Ory;Elizabeth A Ottinger;Nicole Yanjanin Farhat;Kelly A King

  • A sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS method for rapid diagnosis of Niemann-Pick C1 disease from human plasma

    Xuntian Jiang;Rohini Sidhu;Forbes D. Porter;Nicole M. Yanjanin

  • Behavior phenotype in the RSH/Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome.

    Elaine Tierney;Ngozi A. Nwokoro;Forbes D. Porter;Lisa S. Freund;Lisa S. Freund

  • Substrate reduction therapy

    Frances Mary Platt;Emyr Lloyd-Evans;Forbes Dennison Porter

  • LIM-homeodomain gene Lhx2 regulates the formation of the cortical hem.

    S. Bulchand;E.A. Grove;F.D. Porter;S. Tole

  • Use of the Cre/lox Recombination System to Develop a Non-lethal Knock-in Murine Model for Osteogenesis Imperfecta with an α1(I) G349C Substitution: VARIABILITY IN PHENOTYPE IN BrtlIV MICE

    Antonella Forlino;Forbes D. Porter;Eric J. Lee;Heiner Westphal

  • High incidence of unrecognized visceral/neurological late-onset Niemann-Pick disease, type C1, predicted by analysis of massively parallel sequencing data sets

    Christopher A. Wassif;Joanna L. Cross;Joanna L. Cross;James Iben;Luis Sanchez-Pulido

  • Linear Clinical Progression, Independent of Age of Onset, in Niemann-Pick Disease, type C

    Nicole M. Yanjanin;Jorge I. Vélez;Andrea Gropman;Kelly King;Kelly King

  • Biochemical, phenotypic and neurophysiological characterization of a genetic mouse model of RSH/Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome

    Christopher A. Wassif;Pinjun Zhu;Lisa Kratz;Patrycja A. Krakowiak

  • Human malformation syndromes due to inborn errors of cholesterol synthesis.

    Forbes D Porter

  • Lathosterolosis: an inborn error of human and murine cholesterol synthesis due to lathosterol 5-desaturase deficiency

    Patrycja A. Krakowiak;Christopher A. Wassif;Lisa Kratz;Diana Cozma

  • Intracellular sphingosine releases calcium from lysosomes

    Doris Höglinger;Per Haberkant;Auxiliadora Aguilera-Romero;Howard Riezman

  • δ-Tocopherol Reduces Lipid Accumulation in Niemann-Pick Type C1 and Wolman Cholesterol Storage Disorders

    Miao Xu;Miao Xu;Ke Liu;Manju Swaroop;Forbes D. Porter

  • Collaborative Development of 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin for the Treatment of Niemann-Pick Type C1 Disease

    Elizabeth A. Ottinger;Mark L. Kao;Nuria Carrillo-Carrasco;Nicole Yanjanin

  • A novel, highly sensitive and specific biomarker for Niemann-Pick type C1 disease

    Anne-Katrin Giese;Hermann Mascher;Ulrike Grittner;Sabrina Eichler

Frequent Co-Authors

Frances M. Platt
Frances M. Platt University of Oxford
Daniel S. Ory
Daniel S. Ory Washington University in St. Louis
William J. Pavan
William J. Pavan National Institutes of Health
Jean E. Schaffer
Jean E. Schaffer Harvard University
Audrey Thurm
Audrey Thurm National Institutes of Health
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis Rush University Medical Center
Heiner Westphal
Heiner Westphal National Institutes of Health
Alfred L. Yergey
Alfred L. Yergey National Institutes of Health
Steven U. Walkley
Steven U. Walkley Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Constantine A. Stratakis
Constantine A. Stratakis Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a wide range of health and science careers. Many students choose to pursue related degrees or certifications online for added flexibility and affordability. For example, those interested in diagnostic imaging may explore online radiology tech programs, which provide foundational knowledge and practical skills for a fast-growing medical field.

If you are passionate about nutrition and want to help others make healthy choices, researching the best dietitian programs can help you find accredited online options for becoming a registered dietitian or nutritionist. Additionally, moving into patient care roles can start with medical assistant programs online Michigan offers, especially with financial aid opportunities.

For those already working as certified medical assistants, there are programs designed to help you advance your career. Consider the cma to lpn pathway for a step up to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse. Exploring these options can be a strategic way to blend a background in Biology or Biochemistry with practical healthcare credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Forbes D. Porter

Trending Scientists