World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
12649
World Ranking
3024
National Ranking
1721

William H. Redd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Redd sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William H. Redd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Redd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William H. Redd is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on various subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Public Health, Environmental, and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research themes are concentrated around Family Support in Illness, Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies, Cancer survivorship and care, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research, and Circadian rhythm and melatonin.

Recent published papers include:

  • "It Takes a Team to Make It Through: The Role of Social Support for Survival and Self-Care After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant" (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Light Therapy for Cancer-Related Fatigue in (Non-)Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial" (2021), Cancers
  • "Examining the Efficacy of Bright Light Therapy on Cognitive Function in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors" (2022), Journal of Biological Rhythms
  • "Social correlates of distress following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Exploring the role of loneliness and cognitive processing" (2020), UNC Libraries
  • "Self-Efficacy Beliefs Mediate the Relationship between Subjective Cognitive Functioning and Physical and Mental Well-Being after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant" (2020), UNC Libraries

Frequent publication venues for William H. Redd's work are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Cancers
  • Journal of Biological Rhythms
  • Cancer Medicine

Collaborations have been established with several researchers, including:

  • Heiðdís Valdimarsdóttir
  • Lisa M. Wu
  • Christine Rini
  • Gary Winkel
  • Jane E. Austin

William H. Redd's research addresses critical aspects of health and medicine, with a particular emphasis on the psychosocial and cognitive challenges faced by cancer survivors, especially those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The work includes exploring social support mechanisms, fatigue therapies, cognitive functioning, distress, and self-efficacy beliefs in patient populations.

Best Publications

  • Frequency and correlates of posttraumatic-stress-disorder-like symptoms after treatment for breast cancer.

    Matthew J. Cordova;Michael A. Andrykowski;Daniel E. Kenady;Patrick C. McGrath

  • A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: How effective is hypnosis?

    Guy H. Montgomery;Katherine N. Duhamel;William H. Redd

  • The Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale: psychometric properties and association with breast cancer screening.

    Hayley S Thompson;Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir;Gary Winkel;Lina Jandorf

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder in cancer: a review.

    Meredith Y. Smith;William H. Redd;Caroline Peyser;Dan Vogl

  • Physical, psychological, and social sequelae following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a review of the literature

    Catherine E. Mosher;William H. Redd;Christine Marie Rini;Jack E. Burkhalter

  • Assessment of acute pediatric pain : do child self-report, parent ratings, and nurse ratings measure the same phenomenon ?

    Sharon L. Manne;Paul B. Jacobsen;William H. Redd

  • Behavioral Intervention for Cancer Treatment Side Effects

    William H. Redd;Guy H. Montgomery;Katherine N. DuHamel

  • Imagery in human classical conditioning.

    Mark R. Dadds;Dana H. Bovbjerg;William H. Redd;Tim R. H. Cutmore

  • Behavioral intervention to reduce child and parent distress during venipuncture.

    Sharon L. Manne;William H. Redd;Paul B. Jacobsen;Kenneth Gorfinkle

  • Cognitive/Attentional Distraction in the Control of Conditioned Nausea in Pediatric Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy.

    William H. Redd;Paul B. Jacobsen;Maria Die-Trill;Helen Dermatis

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Mothers of Pediatric Cancer Survivors: Diagnosis, Comorbidity, and Utility of the PTSD Checklist as a Screening Instrument

    Sharon L. Manne;Katherine Du Hamel;Kim Gallelli;Karen Sorgen

  • Validation of the PTSD Checklist–Civilian Version in Survivors of Bone Marrow Transplantation

    Meredith Y. Smith;William Redd;Katherine DuHamel;Suzanne Johnson Vickberg;Suzanne Johnson Vickberg

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Patient Navigation to Increase Colonoscopy Screening among Low-Income Minorities

    Jennifer Christie;Steven Itzkowitz;Irene Lihau-Nkanza;Anabella Castillo

  • Dyadic psychosocial intervention for advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers: results of a randomized pilot trial.

    Hoda Badr;Cardinale B. Smith;Nathan E. Goldstein;Jorge E. Gomez

  • Analysis of child and parent behavior during painful medical procedures.

    Paul B. Jacobsen;Sharon L. Manne;Kenneth Gorfinkle;Ora Schorr

  • Intrusive thoughts and psychological distress among breast cancer survivors: global meaning as a possible protective factor.

    Suzanne M. Johnson Vickberg;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Katherine N. DuHamel;Violante Currie

  • Hypnotic control of anticipatory emesis in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

    William H. Redd;Graciela V. Andresen;Rahn Y. Minagawa

  • Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women

    Hayley S Thompson;Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir;Lina Jandorf;William Redd

  • Construct validity of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist in cancer survivors: analyses based on two samples.

    Katherine N. DuHamel;Jamie Ostrof;Teresa Ashman;Gary Winkel

  • Randomized Clinical Trial of Telephone-Administered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Distress Symptoms After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

    Katherine N. DuHamel;Catherine E. Mosher;Gary Winkel;Larissa E. Labay

  • Global meaning and psychological adjustment among survivors of bone marrow transplant

    Suzanne M. Johnson Vickberg;Suzanne M. Johnson Vickberg;Katherine N. Duhamel;Meredith Y. Smith;Sharon L. Manne

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine N. DuHamel
Katherine N. DuHamel Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Christine Rini
Christine Rini Northwestern University
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Paul B. Jacobsen
Paul B. Jacobsen National Institutes of Health
Sharon L. Manne
Sharon L. Manne Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jamie S. Ostroff
Jamie S. Ostroff Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Dana H. Bovbjerg
Dana H. Bovbjerg University of Pittsburgh
Michael A. Andrykowski
Michael A. Andrykowski University of Kentucky
Steven H. Itzkowitz
Steven H. Itzkowitz Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Catherine E. Mosher
Catherine E. Mosher Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially for those aspiring to become licensed therapists. Many states have unique requirements, making it essential to research the steps involved in your chosen location. For example, you can learn more about how to become a licensed therapist in Glendale or understand what is needed for becoming a licensed therapist in Greensboro.

Online psychology programs often provide flexibility and access to coursework that satisfies state licensure criteria. However, requirements such as supervised clinical hours and passing specific exams remain pivotal. For those curious about other regions, discover the Henderson licensed therapist requirements or see the steps for how to become a licensed therapist in Honolulu.

Ultimately, choosing the right online degree and understanding state guidelines are crucial first steps toward a rewarding psychology career. Research local licensing processes and prepare for both academic and professional milestones to succeed in your journey.

Best Scientists Citing William H. Redd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles